Sign In Join 



Article Comments: The World's Quickest Hatchback

48 messages,  Last post on Dec 08, 2006 at 1:53 PM

You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDASPEED MAZDA3, Hatchback

Article comments for Japanese First Drive: Mazdaspeed 3/Axela MPS - If Mazda ever needed a successful volume-selling car to ensure its survival, then the Mazda 3 is it. In just under three years, the popular hatch has sold more than 920,000 units worldwide and rates as one of the most competitive and best-handling hatches on the market. (more)


Messages Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#19 of 48
interesting article.. by kurtamaxxxguy
Sep 23, 2006 (12:22 pm)
Reply
Sounds like a nice alternative to the nice-driving but relatively unreliable Euros.
 
I wonder what the Mazdaspeed3 will actually be selling for off the dealer lots?
#20 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [kurtamaxxxguy] by bigelm
Sep 23, 2006 (8:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Sep 23, 2006 12:22 pm)

I wonder what the Mazdaspeed3 will actually be selling for off the dealer lots?
 
Getting mine at invoice
#21 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [bigelm] by fasterthanyou
Sep 24, 2006 (3:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigelm (Sep 23, 2006 8:19 pm)

Where did you find this deal?
#22 of 48
YES! by bonds77
Sep 27, 2006 (6:59 pm)
Reply
I'm about to start a new family, and this may be the answer to keeping the car I want, but with more room!
 
I have a 2003.5 MazdaSpeed Protege, and I still love it to death. This is simply a continuation, but with more space and power. I found my MS Protege by accident, and paid only 17K when they were clearing them out. I'm hoping that this car ends up being the same way- so in a year I won't have to pay 23K for it.
 
I love this line, and I am happy it's almost a "secret" with the mass-market. Go Mazda!
#23 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [bigelm] by unkownuser
Sep 28, 2006 (2:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigelm (Sep 23, 2006 8:19 pm)

Am I wrong, or is the MS3 at invoice roughly the same price (or more?) as the remaining 06 MS6's with all their rebates?
 
For that price point, isn't the Speed 6 the better value?
#24 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [unkownuser] by pepedlux
Sep 28, 2006 (6:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: unkownuser (Sep 28, 2006 2:43 pm)

Actually you're very wrong, no offense. For one, the MS3 is MUCH cheaper than the 6, and besides, it's sexier. Also, in a number of the reviews I've read, it has been mentioned that the Mazdaspeed3 handles like they wish the 6 would. Between the two, I'd most definetely have to go for the 3. Between the Civic and the MS3, though, that one I'm not so sure about.
 
 
#25 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [pepedlux] by unkownuser
Sep 29, 2006 (7:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: pepedlux (Sep 28, 2006 6:03 pm)

No offense taken!
 
The reason I ask is that I have seen that the 06 Speed 6's are being discounted way down to about 22K. This is the same price point area that the Speed 3 is now being sold at (assuming at MSRP).
 
The Speed 6 is a little bigger and more luxurious, and most importantly it has AWD- seems that would eliminate tendency toward torque steer, as well as the artifically governed 1st & 2nd gears. That's why it seems to me a better buy for the same price.
 
On the other hand, seems like the Speed 3 would be a little more fun to throw around.
 
It's that 22K price point that sticks.
 
This is also a question for the Mazda sales biped- why should I buy X when Y sells for the same price? Call it a negotiating ploy.
#26 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [unkownuser] by rorr
Sep 29, 2006 (8:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: unkownuser (Sep 29, 2006 7:28 am)

"why should I buy X when Y sells for the same price? Call it a negotiating ploy."
 
Because 'X' is a better car? Because 'X' fills your needs/wants/desires better? A Ford F350 4x4, with a MSRP of $40k+ could be HALF PRICE and I'd still prefer a Speed3 at full MSRP.
 
Regarding a Speed6 vs. a Speed3 at roughly the same price:
 
Speaking personally, I don't want AWD, therefore AWD has ZERO value....TO ME. However, I do want a hatchback (for my practical side) and the (hopefully) better gas mileage of a lighter FWD design vs. a heavier AWD design.
 
So, FOR ME even if the two vehicles were the same price, I'd prefer a Speed3. I'd prefer a Speed3 even if the Speed6 was cheaper. That is because I'm IN the Speed3 market; I'm NOT in the Speed6 market. Obviously, you may have different criteria. AWD may have value to you. A large back set may have value to you. The more luxurious interior may have value to you. IF THEY DO, then by all means a Speed6 might make a LOT more sense.
 
Regarding torque steer: from what little I know of the Speed6, it is ESSENTIALLY a FWD design until it detects imminent slippage and then it engages the rear wheels. You can have torque steer WITHOUT spinning the wheels. In other words, don't assume that any AWD design won't have torque steer, particularly if it is biased towards FWD.
 
Second, from what I've read regarding the Speed3, the torque steer (while present) is NOT what one would generally expect given the power/torque it is capable of.
 
Third, with traction control off, there is MORE THAN ENOUGH torque to spin the tires with abandon in first gear and get SOME slip going into 2nd. Given these facts, how would MORE torque in first/second be beneficial?
#27 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [rorr] by unkownuser
Sep 29, 2006 (10:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Sep 29, 2006 8:06 am)

er, my question was not an insult on your preference or capitalization ability. It's a truism that if some one wants something they want it, n'est-ce pas? Rather, I am just confirming that the manufacturer is offering two differing consumer products in segments normally differentiated by perceived value, and hence by price. I'd be curious as to the story the manufacturer, and the retailer, use to explain the phenomenon. In the end, they are just cars, and not people's mamas.
#28 of 48
Re: interesting article.. [unkownuser] by rorr
Sep 29, 2006 (11:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: unkownuser (Sep 29, 2006 10:49 am)

"er, my question was not an insult on your preference or capitalization ability."
 
 
 
It wasn't taken that way either.
 
"Rather, I am just confirming that the manufacturer is offering two differing consumer products in segments normally differentiated by perceived value, and hence by price. I'd be curious as to the story the manufacturer, and the retailer, use to explain the phenomenon."
 
Explain WHAT phenomenon? The fact that some dealer's are offering the Speed6 at essentially the same price as a Speed3?
 
Simple. Supply and demand. Why is it so complicated? They've got more than ample supply of Speed6 and low demand; hence the low-ball prices on a Speed6. They've got little (to no) supply of Speed3 and high demand; hence MSRP (or above).
 
If YOU perceive the Speed6 to have much greater value at 22k than the Speed3, why is this an issue? Buy a Speed6. For the life of me, I don't know where you're going with this.
 
Are you honestly wondering why the demand for Speed6's is much less than anticipated, leading to the low prices?

Messages Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement