Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Wagons Chevrolet HHR Chevy HHR Test Drive - What Did You Think?
39 messages, Last post on Sep 20, 2008 at 1:42 PM
You are in the Chevrolet HHR Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: allfiredup (Dec 28, 2005 10:08 pm) Indeed. In fact, for the time I spent living up in the Fargo/Moorhead "metropolitan area" back in 1994, I never saw another one. And other than that d*** unpleasant stick, I loved the car (great "handling by Lotus" suspension and razor sharp steering). I think you might have hit the nail on the head when you mentioned your being "spoiled" by certain sticks. For whatever reason, the feel of many domestic manuals leaves me cold. It's like the manufacturer is going out of its way to even offer it, so you'll take what they give you or you'll shop over at the import stores. Mazda's are ok by me as are Honda's, but the I prefer the feel of VW's and Hyundai's manuals. It's odd. But it's a personal thing and the difference in feel between two manuals can be - and often is - night and day. That's why I have never and will never order a manual-equipped model of which I've only test-driven the slushbox version. I've never driven a "nightmare" automatic (they all seem about the same to me: you shift the car from park to drive and then to park again). I have driven nightmare sticks though. |
|
|
Replying to: smogdung (Dec 28, 2005 6:51 pm) 
|
|
|
A bit of a slug, in the acceleration department (well, what do I expect - 2.2 liters in 3100 pounds, vs. 2.0 in my stick shift Focus ZX3 weighing about 2600 pounds - even a stick shift can't make up for that). Handled much better than the automatic I drove a few weeks ago (why? probably a difference in subjective impressions - the automatic test drive was mostly straightline, the stick shift test drive today had some curves, and once the car hunkered down it gripped well). Nice interior. I can see why it is popular, but I am migrating more towards a Malibu with the 2.2 (even more of a slug, but not unexpected!). |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: micweb (Nov 16, 2005 5:04 pm) Oh, and btw, you don't have to get all the other extras (I consider 'em goodies, but I understand lots of people don't care to pay for the frills). The 3500 is available in base model sedans. In fact, a coworker bought one that was practically a stripper except for the 6 cylinder about 3 months ago. |
|
|
Replying to: jerrywimer (Nov 18, 2005 4:33 am) This is so that people who now want the 4 can upgrade it from an LS to a 1LT and still keep the 4. I kind of like 4's too...call me crazy, it dates back to Fiat 128 days when a DOHC engine was really cool....
|
|
|
Replying to: micweb (Nov 18, 2005 10:57 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: jerrywimer (Nov 18, 2005 4:33 am) I would rather have the 2.2 L engine in the HHR and put the extra money into something else. I wouldn't be drag racing this vehicle, and I have been driving for mileage for over 10-years-now. |
|
|
Replying to: geemac (Nov 19, 2005 6:02 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: micweb (Nov 16, 2005 5:04 pm) The 2.2 does have decent torque and at half throttle it seems to pull quite well from a stop. It's only when/if you floor it does it seem weak. Most drivers won't ever do that. The 2.4 auto I drove had a lot more kick than the 2.2 manual. Too bad the 2.4 is so hard to find with manual, but the majority of buyers probably wouldn't be interested.
|
|
|
Replying to: allfiredup (Nov 20, 2005 9:46 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons Chevrolet HHR Chevy HHR Test Drive - What Did You Think?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chevrolet HHR
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
