Sign In Join 



All About PHILL

255 messages,  Last post on May 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM

You are in the Honda Civic GX (natural gas) Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Alternative Fuels, Hybrid Cars, Hatchback


Messages Page 23 of 27
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#214 of 255
Re: FMQ2 vs. PHILL [kermit4] by biggjohn
May 24, 2007 (4:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kermit4 (Apr 11, 2007 8:11 am)

If you fuel 2 1/2 GGEs per day, the Phill has a life expectancy of just over 2 1/2 years (2,520 GGE Compressor Service Life). The $2,000 cost of a remanufactured unit doesn't include the costs associated with de-installation and re-installation (approx. $750) or shipping ($300 - $500).
 
The same scenario using an FMQ2-36 has a compressor service life of over 4 1/2 years (4,000 hours). The cost of rebuilding the compressor (in the field) is about $700 + the cost of the service call.
 
While the AQMD does not offer it's buydown on the FMQ2-36, both units are eligible for the $1,000 Federal tax credit. (Give the AQMD a call and ask why they're supporting a specific unit instead of the best technology.)
 
The Phill also uses more than twice as much energy to operate because it runs over twice as long (per GGE).
 
When you consider that the Phill:
1) Can only be rebuilt a maximum of 3 times (vs. unlimited compressor rebuilds for the FMQ2-36).
2) A fill rate of .42 GGE (vs. 1.0 - 1.2 GGE for the FMQ2-36)
3) Fills only one vehicle at a time (vs. up to two vehicles with the FMQ2-36)
4) A remanufactured unit adds over $1.00/GGE to your fueling costs!
the Phill has a catchy name, but doesn't make good economic sense.
 
John
#215 of 255
Re: FMQ2 vs. PHILL [biggjohn] by kermit4
May 25, 2007 (8:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: biggjohn (May 24, 2007 4:45 pm)

The outdoor installation of the FMQ kills it off as a possibility for many people, including yours truly. Our garage is in front of the house. Even with the remote panel installation, we would have still needed to install anything other than the Phill out in the open, in public view (and within earshot of our neighbors). That makes me very, very nervous! I'm not even sure if we could have gotten permitted for such an installation. If our garage was at the back of our property, behind high, locked gates, that might be a different story.
 
Guessing that's why AQMD offers rebates only on the Phill.
#216 of 255
Re: FMQ2 vs. PHILL [kermit4] by biggjohn
May 25, 2007 (5:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kermit4 (May 25, 2007 8:17 am)

The FMQ is quieter than an air conditioner package unit. The FMQ has a locking cover protecting it's control panel and hose. My local Building & Safety Department says that either the FMQ2-36 or the Phill would be permitted, but not in the line of sight of the street. A remote panel can be installed either indoors or out with the FMQ installed in a secure location. Building & Safety will allow a remote panel and hose to located in the line of sight of the street.
 
If central air is generally permitted in your community, the FMQ is probably a viable option.
#218 of 255
Gas Company Approval Denied for PHILL by chileflyer
Jun 16, 2007 (9:44 pm)
Reply
I live in Ventura county and was just denied the Gas Company approval to install a Home Refueling Appliance.
 
I was denied to my area NOT MEETING CARB requirements.
  
The Gas company was not very helpful explaining why in all LA county these units are acceptable and only said "The engineers have determined CARB limits can't be meet in Ventura County". I live in a new area of Camarillo in Mission oaks and still shocked with this notice. They said to call CARB as they are the ones who are causing the issue.
  
I then called and spoke to the CARB regulations office for a lengthy conversation with the main person which is involved with regs. Since I'm an engineer , it was very enlightening to understand the issue. It appears there are 2 issues. 1) CARB requirements are GENERAL and lump Light duty cars and commercial vehicles into one category and 2) The Gas company's ability to control HOT gas in our area.
  
I approached this GREEN car purchase to help my county after reading the LA times articles promoting CNG cars and the Ventura Clean Air Quality Improvement.
 
Does anyone have advice to getting PHILL approved in Ventura county?
 
CARB really explained the Gas Company owns the problem to work on Natural gas delivery in my area but also explained the light duty vehicles are not what CARB regulations were initially written for .. They expect improved categories to avoid these issues in 1-2 years.
  
Is there any assistance anyone can offer?
  
ChileFlyer
#219 of 255
Re: Gas Company Approval Denied for PHILL [chileflyer] by hondagxsales
Jun 16, 2007 (11:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chileflyer (Jun 16, 2007 9:44 pm)

Ihad this discussion with SoCal Gas last year. The way the Alt Fuels division explained it was that there are several sources of gas supplying different communities. Some of those sources pump well grade (hot) gas that has not had the Butane, Ethane and other trace gas' deperated out. One such line comes from Bakersfield and feeds several communities in the Valencia area, as well as others. Several of the beach communities receive the same, unrefined, gas from one, or more, offshore rigs. This includes such areas as Santa Barbara and points south along the coast.
The newer, computer controlled cars can handle it fine, and the law has been removed from the books in every state except Ca. There was an attempt to do away with it in January of this year but either was unsuccessful or was unable to get to this item on the agenda before the session ended. The situation is not dead and it is hopeful that the ruling will be changed (hopefully in Jan. '08) to reflect more current technologies, thereby allowing home refueling for those of you currently being denied.
Curtis
#220 of 255
Re: Gas Company Approval Denied for PHILL [hondagxsales] by bank1avp
Jun 17, 2007 (8:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hondagxsales (Jun 16, 2007 11:10 pm)

Who you would want to get involved because the have the political power as well as a vested interest to get this overturned is Fuelmaker. We all know Fuelmaker is backed by Honda. If all fails gets a used one and do it yourself.
 
Murph
#221 of 255
Re: Gas Company Approval Denied for PHILL by jetboatjohnny
Jun 18, 2007 (1:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bank1avp (Jun 17, 2007 8:41 pm)

I suggest sending a letter, email, and call your local congressman and Arnold the Governator.
#222 of 255
Re: Gas Company Approval Denied for PHILL [jetboatjohnny] by bank1avp
Jun 18, 2007 (7:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jetboatjohnny (Jun 18, 2007 1:17 pm)

Even better get with the Governators office and tell him to stop being a "girly man" and step up.
#223 of 255
Re: Gas Company Approval Denied for PHILL [chileflyer] by grngurl
Jun 23, 2007 (8:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: chileflyer (Jun 16, 2007 9:44 pm)

I purchased a Honda Civic GX last November with the intention of installing a home fueler as well. I live in San Luis Obispo County and am facing the same denials you are.
 
I have been working with our local Air Pollution Control Board representative who is collecting information from American Honda to certify that the 'hot gas' will not damage the vehichle. (This is one of the arguments used by the CARB) He is preparing to submit a request for a waiver of the regulations for San Luis Obispo County.
 
My understanding is that the natural gas for Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, and Monterey Counties does not comply with the CARB regulations as they stand. We need to get these regulations updated to allow installation of home fueling!
 
Contact your local APCB and find out who can help to pursue this matter. From what I got it sounds like we need someone who knows how to navigate red tape in order to get the request for a waiver to the right people.
 
I have the only CNG Honda in this county right now, and have only met one other person with an CNG passenger vehicle. I would be happy to join up with anyone out there who wants to pursue this more assertively with CARB. I find it obscene that the organization that is supposed to be helping to keep our air clean is creating this barrier to cleaner air!

Messages Page 23 of 27
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement