Sign In Join 



Mazda CX-7 Test Drives - what did you think?

101 messages,  Last post on Feb 10, 2007 at 10:06 AM

You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mazda CX-7, SUV


Messages Page 8 of 11
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#62 of 101
MPG [fonefixer] by astegman
Oct 11, 2006 (10:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: fonefixer (Oct 11, 2006 9:15 am)

I think this is the third or fourth time you've asked about the mileage in every thread BUT the MPG thread!!
#63 of 101
Re: Rear view camera , parking and safety [fonefixer] by tidester HOST
Oct 11, 2006 (1:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fonefixer (Oct 11, 2006 9:15 am)

How has the gas mileage been?
 
This is where you want to be: Mazda CX-7: MPG-Real World Numbers
 
tidester, host
#64 of 101
Re: MPG [astegman] by fonefixer
Oct 11, 2006 (2:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: astegman (Oct 11, 2006 10:41 am)

Not every CX-7 owner reads every sub-section of the forum. The more responses received about this issue will help determine a buying decision concerning the CX-7. But really, as another poster stated, "if you can't afford the gas, you can't afford the car," so that should put this matter to rest!
#65 of 101
Re: MPG [fonefixer] by vbbuilt
Oct 11, 2006 (2:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fonefixer (Oct 11, 2006 2:20 pm)

"Not every CX-7 owner reads every sub-section of the forum"
 
That may be true, most people will quickly scan the index of Mazda discussion forums to determine where best to post their questions/comments, instead of throwing a dart to determine where to post.
 
Vince.
#66 of 101
CX-7 vs 6Wagon test drive by autohound1
Nov 25, 2006 (5:28 pm)
Reply
Wasn't sure if anyone in this forum would be interested, but I have test driven both the CX-7 and the 6wagon to compare/contrast and decide between the two. I don't want to double-post, so if you want to see my thoughts on how the two compare, you can find it on the Mazda6 Wagons forum. See posts 1267 and 1268. The first post was from a night-time drive. The second post was after driving both vehicles back to back, during daylight. Both cars are great, but the CX-7 really speaks to your "emotional" side, while the wagon seems perhaps a bit more "practical" overall.
#67 of 101
Re: CX-7 vs 6Wagon test drive [autohound1] by steve_ HOST
Nov 25, 2006 (5:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: autohound1 (Nov 25, 2006 5:28 pm)

Thanks, Autohound.
 
Here's the link:
 
autohound1, "Mazda6 Wagon" #1268, 25 Nov 2006 5:13 pm
 
(It says #1268, but the link should dump you at #1267)
#68 of 101
CX-7 GT vs. Murano SL by pvsurfer
Nov 28, 2006 (11:32 am)
Reply
I just test-drove a CX-7 GT after test-driving a Murano SL (with SL Touring Pkg) and here are my impressions. Btw, both were FWD.
 
Overall looks: I find both CUV's attractive, but I give a slight edge to the CX-7.
 
Seat Comfort: The Murano SL-Touring driver-seat lumbar was more comfortable for me (I have a bad back, so I'm sensitive to that). The back seats are a toss-up.
 
Interior Space: Murano, it's simply larger in every area.
 
Instrumentation: Murano's was very easy to view and was illuminated (orange) all the time without turning the headlights on. On the other hand, I found the 2 instruments on the right-side of the CX-7's cluster (fuel + ?) almost impossible to see clearly in bright daylight!!!
 
Performance: The CX-7 with it's Turbo-4 was faster off the line than the the Murano with its V-6. I think that's due to the Murano's Continuous Variable Transmission (even though I had it in Sport's mode). The CX-7 also cornered better. On the highway however, the Murano was the quieter of the two.
 
Question: One thing I forgot to check-out. Does the CX-7 GT have seat and steering wheel position memories? My wife is 5'2" and I'm 6'0, so it's a drag always having to readjust the seat and steering wheel. The Murano SL did have this nicety (which worked when unlocking the door with the remote).
#69 of 101
Re: CX-7 GT vs. Murano SL [pvsurfer] by fonefixer
Nov 28, 2006 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pvsurfer (Nov 28, 2006 11:32 am)

Driven both cars extensively, decided on the Cx-7. No question, the Murano is more luxurious and roomier, by far. It should be at 3 or 4 thousand dollars more!
 
The Cx-7 is like driving a sports car! The handling, cornering, braking, and acceleration are much more responsive. Didn't like the feel of the CVT transmission, I'm sure it is fine for those that have a "moderate" driving style.
 
Cx-7 does not feature seat memory of any type. I like the roominess of the Murano, but the enjoyed the driving characteristics of the Cx-7 more.
#70 of 101
Re: CX-7 GT vs. Murano SL [fonefixer] by pvsurfer
Nov 28, 2006 (1:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fonefixer (Nov 28, 2006 12:09 pm)

I think you summed it up prety well... I would agree - the Murano SL is more luxurious and spacious, but the CX-7 GT is definitely more fun to drive (if only I could see those 2 gauges)!!!
 
Based on the prices I'm getting, a Murano SL can actually be had for about $2K more than a CX-7 GT (comparably equipped).
#71 of 101
Re: CX-7 GT vs. Murano SL [pvsurfer] by fonefixer
Nov 28, 2006 (2:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pvsurfer (Nov 28, 2006 1:11 pm)

I paid $28,350.00 plus TT+L for the CX-7 GT AWD w/ compass mirror, rear bumper guard,trailer hitch hook up, and rear floor tray w/ no navigation.
 
 Believe a similar equipped AWD Murano w/ no navi runs about $34,000?

Messages Page 8 of 11
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement