Sign In Join 



Honda Fit v. Nissan Versa

228 messages,  Last post on Nov 17, 2009 at 7:19 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Nissan Versa, Car Comparisons, Hatchback


Messages Page 22 of 24
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#206 of 228
Re: JD Powers [kipk] by bobw3
Oct 15, 2007 (9:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Oct 15, 2007 6:47 am)

It's still better then the straight 2s received by the Versa.
#207 of 228
Re: JD Powers [bobw3] by jd10013
Oct 15, 2007 (10:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Oct 15, 2007 9:05 am)

"components that stop working or trim pieces that break or come loose"
 
a little misleading to include that under the category of mechanical reliabilty.
 
build quality would be better. when I hear mechanical qualitly I tend to think powertrain, not a loose trim piece.
#208 of 228
Re: JD Powers [jd10013] by bobw3
Oct 15, 2007 (10:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Oct 15, 2007 10:06 am)

True enough, but I imagine that folks that are this picky aren't restricted to any one vehicle, so these types of picky issues will be spread across all vehicles, thus not affecting the overall score of any one vehicle.
#209 of 228
Re: JD Powers [bobw3] by jd10013
Oct 15, 2007 (10:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Oct 15, 2007 10:10 am)

thats not what I'm saying. I'm saying loose trim pieces shouldn't be included in a category rating mechanical reliability. they way JD power does that doesn't really give you a good indication of how the powertrain on the versa is.
#210 of 228
Re: JD Powers [jd10013] by bobw3
Oct 15, 2007 (3:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jd10013 (Oct 15, 2007 10:27 am)

True...these types of ratings are at a very high level for general comparisons only...unless there's a way of getting more detailed results?
#211 of 228
Re: JD Powers [bobw3] by kipk
Oct 16, 2007 (3:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Oct 15, 2007 9:05 am)

True!
 
Problem I'm having is that the Catagories of Overall Quality Design and Performance Design seem to suggest Design being the factor.
 
Seems to me the DESIGN, function and performance of the area behind the front seats is worthy of a lot more than a 3. Actually the function of the entire car is!
 
One exception would be the drivers seat would benefit with a way to raise it.
 
Keeping in mind some of their "Best Initial Quality" vehicles!
 
Kip
#212 of 228
Edmunds long-term test blog by bobw3
Oct 23, 2007 (11:55 am)
Reply
If you want more opinions on the Versa vs Fit, scroll through some of the blogs on the two cars. It's apparent that one is liked a lot more than the other.
 
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests
#213 of 228
Re: Versa Is the Best [cloned] by macsan
Nov 15, 2007 (12:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: cloned (Apr 17, 2007 4:01 am)

Well I went to test drive the Versa and the Fit and I have concluded that the Fit is the better choice for me for the following reasons:
1.
I preferred the smooth running engine of the Vtec engine to the Versa's 4 banger . While accelerating in the Versa's 1.8sl CVT, i noticed an annoying howl from about 3800rpms up that I didn't like. 2.The steering felt detached from the road as compared to the Fit's excellent and precise feel. The Versa was a little more "comfy" on the road
but not enough to sway my decision.( I wanted to test a six speed but they had none on the lot.) 3. The interior cargo configurations on the Fit wins hands down.
4. The engine on the Fit had plenty of power as long as you weren't afraid to be liberal with the free revving Vtec. (I drove a MT) If you did not know the size of the engine on the Fit and was asked to guess , how many people would say a 1.5 liter?
At highway speeds above 65 the engine was surprisingly smooth even above 3500 rpms. I was concerned about people saying it was too "buzzy". 4. I plan on getting the Fit Sport MT and it comes with a good deal of features that you would have to shell out $ with other cars as option packages. Yes, the Versa has an armrest and foot rest-still not swayed. I heard you can get an armrest on E Bay. Overall I think the Fit is more "sporty" and fun to drive vs. the Versa which is more for sedate cruising and errand running. 5. Its an Honda, I 've owned five of them and all were reliable. I hope this helps....
#214 of 228
Highway cruising:Fit vs. Versa by upstatedoc
May 14, 2008 (11:47 am)
Reply
Currently in the market for a daily commuter, mostly highway (70-75 mph) that not only gets good highway mileage but will pull utility duty on the weekends. I have heard that the Versa may be a more comfortable ride on the highway than the Fit but that the Fit gets better mileage. I would appreciate any Fit or Versa owners with an opinion on this matter!
#215 of 228
Happy with choice by bobw3
Jul 21, 2008 (8:21 am)
Reply
After reading all of the posts on the Versa and Fit forums, I'm glad I bought my Fit nearly 2 years ago. Better MPG, better interior versatility, better quality, etc.

Messages Page 22 of 24
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement