Sign In Join 



Honda Fit v. Nissan Versa

228 messages,  Last post on Nov 17, 2009 at 7:19 AM

You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Nissan Versa, Car Comparisons, Hatchback


Messages Page 19 of 24
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#176 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by kipk [bikedorian] by jacksan1
Jul 21, 2007 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: bikedorian (Jul 21, 2007 6:39 am)

Piece of cake. I have ample room to store my risers. They're not only portable but light as well.
 
I've noticed that, whenever David comes in here and talks about the cargo space, this thread turns into Honda Fit vs. David's Versa. The Versa does not come with David's riser. David's Versa comes with David's riser. As such, am I the only one here who feels that the comparison is not particularly useful?
#177 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by jacksan1 by bikedorian
Jul 21, 2007 (10:31 am)
Reply
How dare I come in here with a simple, extremely low cost and easy as it can get solution to putting a flat floor in the Versa. Shame on me. What am I thinking?
Nissan has an optional riser if that make ya feel better. Mine's just much less expensive and a heck of lot more portable. Maybe you should contact a moderator and express your concerns. I find it humorous.
  
David
#178 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by jacksan1 [bikedorian] by jacksan1
Jul 21, 2007 (10:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: bikedorian (Jul 21, 2007 10:31 am)

More power to you David.
 
Anything is possible if you make a modification. The bottom line is no one can buy a Versa with David's riser in it. As much as I admire your ingenuity, just because this solution works for you, David, it does not necessarily mean this solution is helpful for others who may lack your creativity, skill and/or time. I am merely proposing that perhaps a more useful approach is to compare an unmodified Fit with an unmodified Versa to everyone's benefit. Just an idea. I am sure you and I disagree there.
 
Nissan has an optional riser for the JDM Tiida. I had one. It forces you to lose a LOT of height when you put it in. And you cannot put it away easily, either. And even with the luggage underboard in place, the cargo area still didn't become completely flat. It was expensive - cost me 25,000 yen plus 5% tax. Not a good solution.
#179 of 228
Re: Honda Fit v. Nissan Versa [ttexastommy] by jacksan1
Jul 21, 2007 (11:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: ttexastommy (Jul 20, 2007 7:26 pm)

I saved $2500 on the purchase price and about $1500 on financing charges over the cost of the fit. The fit would have given me better gas mileage, a flat cargo area, and cruise control that I do not have on the versa. I did not think it was worth $4000 for those features. My choice!
 
I would have done exactly what you have done. A good move. As good a car as Fit may be, I'd rather much keep 4 grand in my bank account. And the Versa IS a great car. You have done well.
#180 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by jacksan1 by bikedorian
Jul 21, 2007 (11:51 am)
Reply
"Anything is possible if you make a modification."
 
I didn't modify the Versa in the least. The Versa remains exactly like it was.
  
"The bottom line is no one can buy a Versa with David's riser in it."
 
That is no one's bottom line but yours. Anyone can purchase my riser for peanuts and a few minutes of their time. If you can't deal with that, so be it. Your artificial restriction won't handicap anyone who reads this thread.
If you want to put imaginary barriers up to make you feel better about your Fit, go for it. The Fit's good enough all on it's own not to need such shinanigans.
 
David
#181 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by jacksan1 [bikedorian] by jacksan1
Jul 21, 2007 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: bikedorian (Jul 21, 2007 11:51 am)

If you want to put imaginary barriers up to make you feel better about your Fit, go for it.
 
That's only in your head David. We are only talking about the method of comparison.
#182 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by jacksan1 [bikedorian] by jd10013
Jul 21, 2007 (12:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bikedorian (Jul 21, 2007 11:51 am)

I realy don't see the argument. The Fit has better cargo area due to the way the seat folds. The versa beats the fit when it comes to options, passenger room, and interior quality. which vehicle your choose would depend on what you needed for. although, I don't realy see why, if looking for cargo carrying capacity, you'd be shopping the subcompact segment anyway.
#183 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space by jd10 by bikedorian
Jul 21, 2007 (1:32 pm)
Reply
"if looking for cargo carrying capacity, you'd be shopping the subcompact segment anyway."
 
I made a similar comment earlier in this thread but it's been ignored.
 
"The Fit has better cargo area due to the way the seat folds."
 
The Fit has a better cargo area but it's also smaller. And smaller by a decent amount. So it would depend on what being transported. That's why I've stated that if the design of the Fit is very important but the capacity of the Versa is also very important, buy a Matrix. You can have your cake and eat it too. The drawbacks of the Matrix are more money and less driver satisfaction. It's not a fun vehicle to drive. The Fit and the Versa are fun to drive.
 
David
#184 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space by jd10 [bikedorian] by jd10013
Jul 21, 2007 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bikedorian (Jul 21, 2007 1:32 pm)

yep, just a matter of what you want.
#185 of 228
Re: Reliability, Driving, Cargo Space, MPG by jacksan1 [jacksan1] by jacksan1
Jul 21, 2007 (1:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jacksan1 (Jul 21, 2007 11:57 am)

David, I want to clear the air because I have a sense that you are starting to misunderstand me. I am not here to attack the Versa and praise the Fit. I am only interested in the debate of how to gauge the usability of the cargo space of each of these excellent vehicles. To me, this is all about how to make a useful assessment, not about deciding which car is better or worse in an absolute sense. The latter is not possible, in my opinion.
 
I love the Versa, or rather, I loved the Tiida. My wife and I have a place both in Japan and the U.S., and while we owned a Toyota Premio the last time, we also had use of a Tiida. We were so impressed with the Tiida that when the Versa was released in the U.S., we were going to buy one here. Turned out that it was impossible to find one with ABS at that time. Also, my wife, whose car the Fit in our household is, had certain cargo needs which were better served by the Fit's luggage area. So we bought a Fit. But we loved our Tiida, so we should have been able to be happy with a Versa as well.
 
I drive a Subaru Forester, but for the third car, I am thinking about getting myself a Versa. I don't haul stuff like my wife, so the Versa would be great for me.
 
As a matter of disclosing my background, between the mid- 1980s and 1990s, I worked for a certain Japanese automobile manufacturer whose name shall remain anonymous (otherwise I would have to stop posting here!). I noticed, David, that you believe in the numbers. That is fine, because the numbers are indeed numbers. But numbers can and do often lie. Why? Because you can manipulate the data points.
 
When I worked for this auto manufacturer, we knew how the data points were placed both by JIS (my area) and EPA. It was very important for the marketing purposes to place the maximum measurement data points at those places where JIS and EPA would take the numbers. By doing so, in some cases, usability was sacrificed because of the shape of the interior which was demanded for this manipulation. We knew as auto insiders that there were cars whose official measurements showed lesser numbers and yet whose design was such that the passenger space/cargo area was much more usable than some other cars whose numbers were ostensibly more impressive. Numbers are numbers, but how the numbers were produced does also matter. This is why I have been rather stubbornly adamant about discussing the actual usability of the cargo area of both the Versa and the Fit in this recent exchange, rather than simply pointing out the figures and saying which one is larger or smaller.
 
And to discuss the usability, one of the best ways is to have actually used the space at issue.
 
And I felt that for the sake of keeping the discussion to apples to apples, comparsion of vehicles as being delivered by the factory would be a controlled way of doing so. I see that we see this point differently, and I accept that.
 
In any case, none of what I have said above has anything to do with how I feel about the Versa or the Fit in terms of which is better. I like both cars, and for my own use, I would in fact prefer the Versa to the Fit. I have no interest whatsoever in feeling better about the Fit, which, after all, is my wife's car.
 
I hope this background talk can do some good in our discussion.

Messages Page 19 of 24
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
24
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement