Sign In Join 



Honda Element Real World MPG

117 messages,  Last post on Aug 10, 2009 at 4:17 PM

You are in the Honda Element Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda Element, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV


Messages Page 11 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#96 of 117
Re: Anyone know why the lighter Element gets same hiway MPG [coldcranker] by ccirelli
Aug 06, 2008 (7:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 06, 2008 2:58 pm)

Well - I think we're pretty close. Regardless of what the EPA numbers are, again - I am getting between high 26 and low 28 - with less than 10% highway travel.
 
I am reasonably certain that I could hit 30 on a long flat trip as well, based on what I've seen in my first three tanks.
 
At 60 mph the element (awd ex auto) hovers just under 2K rpm, if I recall correctly (sorry - I've only had it for 10 days..). At 70, 2.25K rpm. Not bad at all, and right inline with my Civic.
 
A lot of factors could go into why these two cars get about the same mileage, despite the weight and hp difference - the short answer is, that's just how they're engineered. Specifically, the CVT and general aerodynamics could be a big part of it as well.
#97 of 117
Re: 28 mpg is tops [ccirelli] by dslightam
Aug 07, 2008 (10:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: ccirelli (Aug 05, 2008 9:33 am)

We have a dog too. We call the car a rolling dog crate. It is the most versitle vehicle I've ever interacted with and I have a hard time thinking of a more versitle one. I'm a little worried about the future child seat and increasing mileage crunch though.
#98 of 117
Re: 28 mpg is tops [dslightam] by ccirelli
Aug 07, 2008 (10:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: dslightam (Aug 07, 2008 10:36 am)

Hahaha - "rolling dog crate" - perfect!
 
Ya between my dogs and my photo gear, it so versatile. Coming from a 36+ mpg Civic, it is still worth the difference in mpg.
 
I think the car will work well with your child seat, with the way the doors are designed. And it's an added safety that kids can't open the back doors without the front doors being opened first (although, to some, this is not a plus...).
#99 of 117
Re: Anyone know why the lighter Element gets same hiway MPG [ccirelli] by coldcranker
Aug 07, 2008 (4:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ccirelli (Aug 06, 2008 7:20 pm)

The Freestyle should have horrible aerodynamics, just as the Element is not that good either. They are blunt boxes with only a little curviness here and there in the corners. Therefore, I don't know that aero has much to do with the fact that a heavier, faster Freestyle has about the same MPG as a lighter Element. Without other ideas about where the extra gasoline is going in the Element, I'd have to say that it must be the effects of gear ratios accounting for it. With a higher top gear, the Element should be able to reach better highway MPG.
#100 of 117
Re: Anyone know why the lighter Element gets same hiway MPG [coldcranker] by stevedebi
Aug 13, 2008 (3:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 07, 2008 4:29 pm)

"The Freestyle should have horrible aerodynamics, just as the Element is not that good either. They are blunt boxes with only a little curviness here and there in the corners. "
 
I owned a 206 FS, and I don't think the aerodynamics are nearly as bad as the Element. The Element is boxy; the Freestyle (while is has a pretty large frontal area) is much "smoother". It is based on the Ford 500.
 
I think the difference between the two is the CVT in the FS. When coupled with the 3.0 engine, the computer can use the lowest possible RPM.
#101 of 117
2007 Element EX AUTO 4WD MPG by ragets
Aug 13, 2008 (5:17 pm)
Reply
I cannot believe I did this great with my car. I've been averaging 23-25MPG. But on my last tank I put 300 miles on and only filled up 9.78 gallons. That means I got 30.67MPG!!!! I couldn't believe it!
I use Shell Gas because it seems to run better and get better MPG's.
I go about 75% highway, 20% dirt/gravel roads, 5%city.
I ease off the gas pedal, brake easy, only use the A/C in spurts on the highway, use windows in town.
I wish I would have gotten the manual transmission though. I hate how long this auto takes to shift up and down. I wish I could do it myself!
#102 of 117
Re: 2007 Element EX AUTO 4WD MPG [ragets] by ccirelli
Aug 13, 2008 (7:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ragets (Aug 13, 2008 5:17 pm)

30.67? Wow, I thought my record of 28.01 (non-highway) was good. Nice job!
 
Sounds like that automatic transmission is doing just fine for you!
#103 of 117
Re: 2007 Element EX AUTO 4WD MPG [ragets] by micweb
Aug 17, 2008 (3:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ragets (Aug 13, 2008 5:17 pm)

Individual tank measurements are unreliable. There is too much fill variation. You have to average tanks for reliability. At least measure mileage the tank before and the tank after. You may discover that one of them is abnormally low, indicating that you had a fill variation not a
#104 of 117
Re: 2007 Element EX AUTO 4WD MPG [micweb] by ccirelli
Aug 17, 2008 (6:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: micweb (Aug 17, 2008 3:59 pm)

I think the end of your message was cut off somehow.
 
Fill variation - well, for me, I fill up at the same Sunoco (and usually the same pump) and I will go $.75 to $1.00 over the first "click". Trying to be as consistent as possible. Under my conditions, would I really see significant fill variation, to the point where that would effect mpg more so than everyday driving variations and conditions?
 
Not arguing - just curious.
 
craig
#105 of 117
Re: 2007 Element EX AUTO 4WD MPG [ccirelli] by micweb
Aug 20, 2008 (8:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: ccirelli (Aug 17, 2008 6:25 pm)

Same pump with "one click over" is pretty reliable. I've found there is quite a variation at SOME stations in the amount of "fill" you get. You have to watch for level ground. But using the same pump at the same station with your vehicle oriented the same way is pretty reliable.
 
Part of the fill variation comes from the air bubble that fuel tanks are supposed to preserve to allow for gas expansion and vapor recovery system operation.
 
Let us know if you get some repetition of that high mileage number - try to trace it to driving conditions, driving style (lighter throttle?). That type of mileage on the 3400 pound, big square box, AWD Element is phenomenal.
 
In my own case, after 4,500 miles of driving my Nissan Versa (2008, 6 speed manual) I finally got a single high mileage tank - 35 mpg vs. the more usual 32 mpg. I am trying to figure out if that is a false reading due to fill variation, of if I did less weekend and after work surface street driving, and more of the freeway commuting.
 
BTW I write down the mileage on the receipt and use a calculator to figure the mileage.
 
The thing about mileage reports is that people often due the math "in their head" or round up or down on the miles or gallons to make it simpler. So anecdotal reports from the general public who winced at math and science classes is often suspect, particularly when the numbers are unusually high or low. Although given the prevalence of "lead foot-itis" in modern America, unusually low numbers don't seem that unusual anymore.

Messages Page 11 of 13
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement