- #542 of 547
-
Re: Finally Test drove the Ridgeline [felixdacat13]
by beanctr
-
Nov 04, 2007 (7:51 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: felixdacat13 (Nov 02, 2007 11:42 am)
felixdacat13, I purchased a Ridgeline back in December 2005 after test driving the Tacoma and Frontier. The Tacoma and Frontier were both nice vehicles and I actually preferred the styling and horsepower of both to the Ridgeline; however, when it came down to functionality, the Ridgeline I felt won hands down. If you shop around, you should be able to get a good deal on any one of these trucks right now. When I purchased my Ridgeline (RTL) back in 2005, I got nearly $5,000 off MSRP. Also, like you, I felt the engine noise of the Tacoma was louder than I thought it should be (mostly when accelerating). I had owned a 2001 Tacoma and thought they could have improved more in this area when they did their redesign. Good luck with your shopping.
|
- #543 of 547
-
HELLO? Hello? hello?
by thegraduate
-
Apr 24, 2008 (9:49 am)
-
|
Wow, it's empty in here... I thnk I hear an echo!
Anybody still cross-shopping these?
|
- #544 of 547
-
Re: One reporter commented... [rsholland]
by sparkland
-
May 10, 2008 (7:14 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rsholland (Feb 06, 2005 6:29 am)
Here is why the Ridgeline should be considered by all those thinking about purchasing a pickup. These two people in the Ridgeline survived this crash because of the safety features included in the Honda. Scroll down to the bottom of the page in the link.
http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/forums/miscellaneous-general-honda-ridgeline-- discussions/21863-my-ridgeline-saved-my-life-2.html
Brad
|
- #545 of 547
-
roadranger
by roadranger
-
Dec 19, 2008 (8:37 pm)
-
|
|
I recently bought a 09 Jetta TDI for my wife.I drive a 95 Silverado Stepside.I need a new truck and I don't want an ethenol burner.I like the Ram with the Cummins,but it seems like an overkill for my purpose.I've looked at the Ridgeline and I like what I see.If it came with a good diesel setup,I'd probably buy it. PS:The 09 Jetta TDI is Awesome!
|
- #546 of 547
-
Re: roadranger [roadranger]
by thegraduate
-
Jan 20, 2009 (9:23 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: roadranger (Dec 19, 2008 8:37 pm)
What do you mean "Ethanol Burner?" A Flexible-Fuel vehicle?
May I ask why you don't want one?
|
- #547 of 547
-
Re: roadranger [thegraduate]
by roadranger
-
Jan 20, 2009 (1:43 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Jan 20, 2009 9:23 am)
No,not exactly.I mean anything that burns gasoline and whatever else our congress decides we should put into it,whether or not it makes economic sense.The diesel engine has always been a flex-fuel engine.Old Rudolf Diesel's first one ran on peanut oil.Diesel engines have long been more efficient,and longer lasting than gas engines,and now modern diesel technology has made them cleaner than gas engines.Our options are broader with diesels.We now run mostly on kerosene,but coal-to-liquid is another option.(check out Sasol in South Africa,and Rentech in the United States).Synthetic Diesel from natural gas is also feasable,as is Bio-Diesel from a variety of plants.Jatropha probably holds the most promise there,but soy,canola,and palm oil work too.All of these forms of fuel can be blended and substituted without any changes in the engines, and can be shipped through conventional pipelines.Ethanol can't,and makes no sense.
|