Sign In Join 



What Will Be a Future Classic?

588 messages,  Last post on Sep 06, 2009 at 3:54 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Future Vehicle, Coupe, Convertible, Sedan


Messages Page 56 of 60
1
...
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#544 of 588
Re: Shifty: [Mr_Shiftright] by fezo
Jan 25, 2009 (6:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 25, 2009 5:56 pm)

Let's see... some of these you can figure out.....
 
Bot the Contours and the Thunderbird had a couple of fatal flaws in them. The Contour has early bugs (SURPRISE! Can you say Focus?) and the Thunderbird was pretty enough but built to drive on a highway which really wasn't supposed to be the idea.
 
The Vega and Citation both got sent out with fatal flaws. The Vega had that godawful aluminum block that let you join the head gasket of the month club, The Citation was supposed to replace the Malibu and wasn't at all ready for something like that. It had too much that was brand new to GM and just had too much of a task staying in one piece. In both cases a nice thought combined with awful execution.
 
The Malibu and Town Car were just forgettable vehicles.
 
This of course brings us back to the Alliance and the Mustang II. What on earth were these people thinking? I mean both the manufacturers and even more so the folks that said this is the car of the year!??!? Were there no other nominees in those years? Surely SOMETHING had to be out there! Didn't even have to be good - just not awful. Heck, they somehow managed to never name the Pacer as car of the year.
 
Speaking of that I actually had a friend who ahd a Pacer and replaced it when it dies with an Alliance. Needles to say he didn't ask me about buying cars...
#545 of 588
Re: Shifty: [berri] by corvette
Jan 25, 2009 (7:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Jan 25, 2009 5:52 pm)

Typical Detroit, shove it out before its ready, over due the cost cutting, and then act dumbfounded at the consequences.
 
Yep. I remember when Dodge introduced the Charger. It was highly touted that they all came standard with a 3.5 liter V6, ABS, stability control, and side airbags. Then, the next year, Dodge introduced a version with a woefully inadequate 2.7 liter V6, no ABS, no stability control, no side airbags (and goodness knows what else they deleted). This is progress? This new, fleet-friendly model still had the triple-flashing turn signals, which were probably pulled from the Mercedes parts bin.
#546 of 588
Re: Shifty: [fezo] by xrunner2
Jan 26, 2009 (6:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Jan 25, 2009 5:27 pm)

Because of Car and Driver accolades, I too test drove a Contour and did like its handling. But, that was all. The interior looked cheap and was tight. Took a pass on it and bought a new Honda.
 
Owning 2 Hondas for 11 years at time of driving Contour, my standards were higher. Other downsides to a possible Contour purchase were some negative experiences with previous Fords.
#547 of 588
Re: Shifty: [corvette] by boomchek
Jan 26, 2009 (10:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: corvette (Jan 25, 2009 7:42 pm)

still had the triple-flashing turn signals, which were probably pulled from the Mercedes parts bin.
 
Many parts on the LX platform cars (Magnum, Charger, and 300) are from the Mercedes Parts bin. There's more parts shared in other cars too.
 
You're correct the turn signals, cruise control, and wiper stalks are straight out of a Benz. The EVIC (electronic vehicle info centre) on those cars and the Grand Cherokees that scrolls through fuel economy, programmable door locks, etc are also from Mercedes.
 
Not to mention a whole car was pillaged from the Mercedes Benz obsolete parts bin and rebadged a Chrysler.
 
Anyone care to remember the Crossfire? It will probably have the same "classic" status as the modern T Bird.
#548 of 588
Re: Shifty: [boomchek] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 26, 2009 (10:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: boomchek (Jan 26, 2009 10:12 am)

I knew immediately that the Crossfire was doomed. WAY too expensive for a Chrysler coupe of modest power and questionable styling. You are right, they made the same *exact* errors as Ford did with the new T-Bird.
#549 of 588
Re: Shifty: [boomchek] by fintail
Jan 26, 2009 (10:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: boomchek (Jan 26, 2009 10:12 am)

I remember when the Crossfire first came out, I went down the local dealer to look at it. It had a $10K ADM... I am pretty sure I laughed out loud.
#550 of 588
Re: Shifty: [fintail] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 26, 2009 (10:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Jan 26, 2009 10:24 am)

Consider the grim reality that someone probably paid it.
#551 of 588
Re: Shifty: [Mr_Shiftright] by fintail
Jan 26, 2009 (10:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 26, 2009 10:27 am)

I remember they were doing the same for the PT Cruiser too...in 2000 a loaded one would bring nearly 30K!
#552 of 588
Re: Shifty: [Mr_Shiftright] by kyfdx HOST
Jan 26, 2009 (12:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 26, 2009 10:27 am)

Couple of member recently report paying $17K-$18K for new '08 Crossfires... with $38K MSRPs...
#553 of 588
Re: Shifty: [kyfdx] by fezo
Jan 26, 2009 (3:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kyfdx (Jan 26, 2009 12:56 pm)

The bonus version of the Worst cars of the year list. Same cars but in the Car and Driver version you get all the reader comments. Some are great! Heck, there's even a guy in there claiming that the Mustang II wasn't bad. Yes it was. Monstrously so.

Messages Page 56 of 60
1
...
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement