Sign In Join 



What Will Be a Future Classic?

588 messages,  Last post on Sep 06, 2009 at 3:54 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Future Vehicle, Coupe, Convertible, Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 59
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
59
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 588
I'm cheap... by turboshadow
Jul 27, 2006 (3:39 am)
Reply
I would like the following cars, which I think might become collectible, but would really want one just to drive. Problem is, in my ornery middle age (just tuned 40 ) I can't see paying more than 10K for a plaything. Y'all speculate when I'll be able to purchase the following for under 10K:
 
SSR, stick shift
Crossfire coupe, stick
GTO, stick
 
TIA!
 
Turboshadow
#52 of 588
What about keeping them running years from now? by rowlandj
Jul 27, 2006 (5:01 am)
Reply
In the 'older classics' with pure mechanical components like points and condensers etc... it is relatively easy to keep the older cars running. What happens to these computer and sensor driven classics years from now when these components have issues? Not to mention the future potential lack of suitable fuel to work with these very emission driven systems.
 
It has been something I have been considering for a while and I wonder what other folks think about this?
 
JR
#53 of 588
Re: What about keeping them running years from now? [rowlandj] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 27, 2006 (6:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: rowlandj (Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am)

I think hobbyists will be force to make modifications to keep the cars of today running. I suppose some folks are already hoarding ECMs, etc, but some cars have over 75 computers in them of various types and over 5 million lines of computer code, so...er...lotsa luck.....
 
Possibly on the really prolific cars, like Mustangs, aftermarket vendors might try to repo new or repair old circuit boards, etc. but with some of these very high powered chips, I dunno.....
 
Ditto on all the plastic panels and interior vacuum molded stuff---this stuff is going to be really expensive to re-make.
#54 of 588
That's something... by andre1969
Jul 27, 2006 (7:32 am)
Reply
I've wondered about too. I mean, at least with some of the earlier attempts at complexity, when things failed you could often just disable them or swap an older, more reliable component in. I'm thinking stuff here like Chrysler's Lean Burn, the Caddy V-8-6-4, etc. Or if a catalytic converter rusts out and you can't find a replacement, just run a straight pipe.
 
Nowadays though, the electronics and emissions are much more complicated. And if someone wants to try keeping an old PT Cruiser or Focus running decades down the road, it won't be quite so simple. Although I have seen 426 Hemis in PT's and Ford 351W's in Focuses, so maybe there is some hope.
#55 of 588
Re: I'm cheap... [turboshadow] by lemmer
Jul 27, 2006 (7:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: turboshadow (Jul 27, 2006 3:39 am)

Couldn't be too long. Almost nobody wants any of those cars new.
#56 of 588
Re: I'm cheap... [turboshadow] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 27, 2006 (8:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: turboshadow (Jul 27, 2006 3:39 am)

SSR and Crossfire will soon be in the value basement and they will probably stay there. You won't have long to wait.
 
 The GTO might take a bit longer, since it has decent and serious horsepower and is fun to drive.
#57 of 588
Too bad... by lemko
Jul 27, 2006 (11:33 am)
Reply
...Chrysler didn't put a 5.7 Hemi in the Plymouth Prowler instead of a V-6. It would then be a sure-fire collectible. I wonder if the Stealth has a chance at collectibility despite its Mitsubishi origins?
#58 of 588
Re: What about keeping them running years from now? [Mr_Shiftright] by au1994
Jul 27, 2006 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jul 27, 2006 6:55 am)

Ditto on all the plastic panels and interior vacuum molded stuff---this stuff is going to be really expensive to re-make
 
hmmm...I smell a business opportunity.
#59 of 588
Re: Too bad... [lemko] by lemmer
Jul 27, 2006 (1:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jul 27, 2006 11:33 am)

Stealth has no chance - it was always a last place car behind the Supra, 300ZX, RX-7, Corvette, and anything else that happened to be in any given comparison.
 
Come to think of it, I suspect most people even preferred the virtually identical Mitsu 3000.
#60 of 588
Re: Too bad... [lemko] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 27, 2006 (5:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jul 27, 2006 11:33 am)

I agree, Stealth is totally dead and forgotten. Whoever designed the interior on that car should be put up against a wall and shot. .

Messages Page 6 of 59
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
59
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement