You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit

389 messages, Last post on Apr 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: steven39 (Nov 10, 2006 1:34 pm) Some of the cars that still use a prop rod totally floors me, given their prices -- Nissan Z, Infiniti G, Mustang Selby, Pathfinder, Honda Pilot, to name a few. I wouldn't go so far as to say a prop rod, alone, is a deal-breaker for me, but it definitely has been a contributing factor in my eliminating some cars from my shopping list. |
|
|
Replying to: steven39 (Nov 10, 2006 1:34 pm) Don't sweat it, buy exactly what you want and like...I'm just poking a little fun.
|
|
| just for the record here folks,the rabbit's hood is opened with a gas strut, not a prop rod.i just feel that prop rods belong on under $10,000 kia's and hyundai's not on 20,000.00+ cars.it's tasteless as far as iam concerned. | |
|
Replying to: audia8q (Nov 10, 2006 2:16 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: steven39 (Nov 10, 2006 1:34 pm) Gas struts and coil springs on hoods have both caused me a problem or two on cars over that past 30 years. I prefer a prop rod. Redline Tuning offers gas strut kits for many makes and models of vehicles for those who prefer gas struts on their hoods.
|
|
|
Replying to: moparbad (Nov 10, 2006 3:46 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: johnnyvj (Sep 25, 2006 4:43 pm) Back in the 60s, VW had almost 50% of US import car market share, by far the largest. Right now? They barely exist. I guess most VW owners never returned, indeed. Back in the 90s, VW had almost 50% of Chinese car market share, by far the largest. Right now? They are down to 20%. Coincidence? History repeating itself? IMO, a car is "cheap" if it fails to deliver the service expected. VW's have been "cheap" for quite some time.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: moparbad (Oct 26, 2006 8:17 am) Bottom line, reliability goes to VW Rabbit compared to Mazda 3. Do you know what is quality and what is reliability? If it's 2006 data and from JD Power, then it must be the IQS (initial quality study). It's about whether the buyer likes the car or not for the first 90 days of ownership. In case you don't know, JD Power also conduct a relaibility study that documents the ownership experience for a period of time at 3 years or longer. Better yet, Consumer Report has typically 10 years of study for reliability. And if can guess right, according to both JDP and CR, VW Golfs/Beetles are about THE least reliable cars in this segment.
|
|
|
Replying to: killerbunny (Nov 10, 2006 9:02 pm) Diminished market share in the scenario you described did not necessarily mean diminished product quality. In both cases, it was simply the result of gradual infusion of other import brands. Especially with the Chinese market. One cannot simply walk into the Chinese market. The government there can and will make you go through all kinds of hoops. And you have to know that, until relatively recently, the Chinese was not friendly to Japanese products, cars included. Even if VW had improved quality, more competition would have resulted in reduced market share. "...a car is "cheap" if it fails to deliver the service expected" I also don't agree with that statement. Cheap and reliability, or lack of, are 2 distinctly different issues. Jags and MB do not particularly have good reliability records. But I doubt you would hear anyone refer to them as cheap. And for the record, I know plenty of repeat, in some cases, life-long, VW customers. |
|
|
Replying to: steven39 (Nov 10, 2006 1:00 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
2009 Volkswagen Rabbit



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats