Ask the Car People.SM


Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit - READ ONLY

389 messages,  Last post on Apr 17, 2009 at 1:40 PM

You are in the Hatchbacks - Archived Discussions Forum.

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hatchbacks Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA3, Volkswagen Rabbit, Car Comparisons, Hatchback

Messages Page 37 of 39

#360 of 389 CR by hpowders

May 29, 2008 (9:49 am)

Consumer Reports recently published a hatchback comparo (as linked in a previous post) and the VW Rabbit S automatic 4 door won. They listed this vehicle as having better than average reliability and is their top pick of the small hatchbacks.
 
Because of the CR recommendation, I placed an order for one. What I have found is you can wait forever to get this car if you order it the way you want it. VW really must improve their distribution system.
 
THIRTEEN WEEKS??

#361 of 389 Re: CR [hpowders] by aviboy97

May 29, 2008 (10:34 am)

Replying to: hpowders (May 29, 2008 9:49 am)
That's nothing compared to Mazda. To get a Mazda3 from the factory, you are looking at about 16 weeks.

#362 of 389 Re: CR [aviboy97] by hpowders

May 29, 2008 (10:46 am)

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 29, 2008 10:34 am)
That's pretty bad.
  
I have a leased vehicle due back July 31st. I e-mailed my VW sales guy this morning to give me a definite commitment on an ordered Rabbit by June 5th, or I have to walk. The guy didn't ask me for a deposit yet and he took my order two weeks ago. He won't ask me for a deposit until he knows for sure he can get me the vehicle. I hear VW isn't building any more 2008's, so there is a real possibility he won't be able to get it for me.

#363 of 389 Re: CR [hpowders] by roadburner

May 29, 2008 (12:43 pm)

Replying to: hpowders (May 29, 2008 10:46 am)
Well, you are still better off than me. The VW dealers in the Louisville area aren't the least bit interested in ordering cars for customers. That's one of the reasons I wound up with a Mazdaspeed3.

#364 of 389 Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [dougjp] by myershift

Oct 14, 2008 (10:24 pm)

Replying to: dougjp (Jul 08, 2006 12:29 pm)
Having driven both of these vehicle types (Mazda3 and Volkswagen Rabbit (Golf)) back to back, I can give a educated opinion on both and why I chose the VW.
 
I first drove the Mazda. It featured the 5-speed manual and 2.3L I-4. It was a fun car to drive, well equipped, and nicely peppy. The styling inside and out is sharp, sexy (for a compact) and modern. Materials used in the cabin were nice enough but the LED strip in the stereo head unit was gimmicky.
 
Then I drove the Volkswagen. It felt more solid and substantial as well as feeling of a more mature car. Its manual transmission also had a more connected and mechanical feel. Styling is subdued but pleasing, with easy entry seats into the rear of the 3-door model.
 
I did return to drive the Mazda, and that sealed the deal for me to get the VW.
The Mazda is a noisy little bastard of a fun car but has far too much commotion for my tastes and felt like a cheap tin can compared to the Volkswagen Rabbit.
 
Also, in my 2008 VW Rabbit witht he 170hp 2.5L 5-cylinder engine, I average at least 26 mpg and have seen up to 31 mpg on the Interstate.

#365 of 389 Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [myershift] by autonomous

Oct 16, 2008 (3:01 pm)

Replying to: myershift (Oct 14, 2008 10:24 pm)
my 2008 VW Rabbit witht he 170hp 2.5L 5-cylinder engine, I average at least 26 mpg and have seen up to 31 mpg on the Interstate.
 
These are unimpressive numbers for a small car using a manual transmission.
 
The Mazda is a noisy little bastard of a fun car but has far too much commotion for my tastes and felt like a cheap tin can compared to the Volkswagen Rabbit
Bizarre, this description of the Mazda3 seems to defy all previous evaluations of the car.

#366 of 389 Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [autonomous] by bodble2

Oct 16, 2008 (5:00 pm)

Replying to: autonomous (Oct 16, 2008 3:01 pm)
"These are unimpressive numbers for a small car using a manual transmission."
 
Borrowing football parlance, I actually think the Rabbit is a bit of a tweener --- even though in exterior dimensions it seems to compete with cars such as the Mazda3 and Civic, in terms of engine size & output, and interior room and amenities, and overall refinement, it almost can be compared to the next size segment, the 4 cyl versions of the Legacy, Accord, Mazda6, etc. If view in that vein, then its mpg is not too disappointing. Just like the Mini, even though it is a small car, I don't think fuel economy has ever been its top priority.

#367 of 389 Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [autonomous] by jeffyscott

Oct 17, 2008 (6:29 am)

Replying to: autonomous (Oct 16, 2008 3:01 pm)
These are unimpressive numbers for a small car using a manual transmission.
 
Rabbit 2.5 is rated at 21/30 and the Mazda3 2.3 at 22/29 mpg (both w/manual trans) by EPA. Based on this a driver of either car should be expected to get about the same mpg.

#368 of 389 Beautiful = over 30 and under 3000 pounds [jeffyscott] by autonomous

Oct 17, 2008 (2:08 pm)

Replying to: jeffyscott (Oct 17, 2008 6:29 am)
Rabbit 2.5 is rated at 21/30 and the Mazda3 2.3 at 22/29 mpg (both w/manual trans) by EPA. Based on this a driver of either car should be expected to get about the same mpg.
 
Agreed. But since the average fuel economy of both cars with manual transmissions is in the mid to high 20's it remains unimpressive and needs improvement. A small car with a manual transmission should be averaging in the 30's not the 20's in my opinion. One way of achieving this is by shaving weight off the car; both cars should be aiming for 2500 pounds rather than the nearly 3000 pounds they cart around.

#369 of 389 Re: Beautiful = over 30 and under 3000 pounds [autonomous] by backy

Oct 17, 2008 (2:37 pm)

Replying to: autonomous (Oct 17, 2008 2:08 pm)
So I am wondering, why can a 3200 pound BMW with a 193 hp I6 and a stick shift get mid-30s on the highway and mid-20s in town, while these newer, lighter cars with much smaller engines can't make those numbers? Or why does a 3200 pound mid-sized sedan with a 175 hp I4 get better fuel economy than these smaller, lighter, less powerful cars?

Messages Page 37 of 39

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement