You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit

389 messages, Last post on Apr 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: johnnyvj (Sep 25, 2006 4:43 pm) |
|
|
i went to my local vw-mazda dealership a few days ago to test drive both the 07 mazda 3 and a 07 vw rabbit.this dealership sells both brands.anyway,i test drove the mazda 3 first and while it handled pretty well it rode pretty rough and there was lots of road noise.you feel every bump with the mazda 3.next was the rabbit 4 door with auto,and what a difference the rabbit test drive was.the rabbit felt much more solid on the road,had a more comfortable ride with great handleing,and was more quiet inside than the mazda 3.a few key selling points that the rabbit has over the mazda 3 is,better ride,quieter interier,better stereo,and better bumper to bumper warranty coverage.4/50,000 compared with 3/36,000 with the mazda 3.
|
|
|
Replying to: steven39 (Oct 20, 2006 6:03 pm) I hope you bought an extended warranty with that. After 50K, VW's have been known to be an electrical nightmare after 50K. If you leased it, you should be OK. I have driven the new Rabbit as well. It is a nice driving car, with a competitive price. I just don't trust German reliability. |
|
|
Replying to: steven39 (Oct 20, 2006 6:03 pm) Dave |
|
|
|
|
Knowing that I was going to buy one or the other, I test drove both the Mazda 3 and the VW Rabbit. I drove the 3 in both the sedan and the hatch, and I drove the rabbit in the 2 door. While the Mazda was zippier feeling and quicker around corners, the VW had a smoother quieter ride. Interiors impressed me similarly and price was close enough so I had to decide based on use. I am a product rep and spend a lot of time on the highway, as well as on icy roads. The VW had a nicer feel for long trips and the ASR does a great job at keeping the wheels from spinning on the slick spots. I've heard all the issues about VW reliability, however we've had several VWs in the family that all lasted far longer than they should have. As far as Mazda goes, we've had three. One made it to 200,000 with barely more then frequent oil changes. One was on its third tranny when it was dumped and the other was on its second. Both were under 100,000 miles. Everyone can make a lemon, and most everyone can build a great car. I just picked what worked best for me. |
|
|
Replying to: ninjaman (Sep 21, 2006 11:16 am) 06 Golf had higher quality rating (fewer problems per vehicle)than Mazda 3 as rated by JD Power. It is expected that the Rabbit will have better quality than the Golf based on actual quality improvements seen in Europe when Golf IV model switched to Golf V model (Golf V = Rabbit). Bottom line, reliability goes to VW Rabbit compared to Mazda 3.
|
|
|
Maybe. It sounds like a gamble until the car's been around for a few years. |
|
|
Replying to: moparbad (Oct 26, 2006 8:17 am) You are forgetting that JD Powers rates vehicles based on "the first 90 day's of ownership". If you buy a new vehicle every 90 days, then the VW is for you. If you plan on owning the car longer then that, perhaps 5yrs or more, like the majority of vehicle owners, then the Mazda3 rates out better. CR places VW next to last in reliability, only Mercedes-Benz rates lower, and Mazda is near the top. Bottom line, reliability goes to VW Rabbit compared to Mazda 3. I would reverse that conclusion.
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Oct 26, 2006 8:54 am)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
2009 Volkswagen Rabbit



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats