Sign In Join 



Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit

389 messages,  Last post on Apr 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM

You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA3, Volkswagen Rabbit, Car Comparisons, Hatchback


Messages Page 5 of 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
40
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#36 of 389
Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [johnnyvj] by dride
Oct 04, 2006 (3:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: johnnyvj (Sep 25, 2006 4:43 pm)

Agreed, I would not drive a VW again even if I was paid to do so. After 50k miles, mine started falling apart: interior switches, water pump, cat. converter, the clutch started slipping, the temp sender went bad almost every other month... What a drag, but I still felt "connected" to the car. It was the terrible customer service that angered me the most. I could be dropping $1,600 for repairs, and they would still send me to the payphone to call for a ride! And getting a loaner during repairs, yeah right! IMHO purchasing a new VW is a mistake, but purchasing a new VW in in its first model year is a really bad idea (ask anyone who owned a 98 bug). I knew too many people who also "got bad ones". What an unreliable vehicle.
#37 of 389
mazda 3 vs vw rabbit by steven39
Oct 20, 2006 (6:03 pm)
Reply
i went to my local
vw-mazda dealership a few days ago to test drive both the 07 mazda 3 and a 07 vw rabbit.this dealership sells both brands.anyway,i test drove the mazda 3 first and while it handled pretty well it rode pretty rough and there was lots of road noise.you feel every bump with the mazda 3.next was the rabbit 4 door with auto,and what a difference the rabbit test drive was.the rabbit felt much more solid on the road,had a more comfortable ride with great handleing,and was more quiet inside than the mazda 3.a few key selling points that the rabbit has over the mazda 3 is,better ride,quieter interier,better stereo,and better bumper to bumper warranty coverage.4/50,000 compared with 3/36,000 with the mazda 3.
#38 of 389
Re: mazda 3 vs vw rabbit [steven39] by aviboy97
Oct 23, 2006 (11:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: steven39 (Oct 20, 2006 6:03 pm)

better bumper to bumper warranty coverage.4/50,000 compared with 3/36,000 with the mazda 3.
 
I hope you bought an extended warranty with that. After 50K, VW's have been known to be an electrical nightmare after 50K.
 
If you leased it, you should be OK.
 
I have driven the new Rabbit as well. It is a nice driving car, with a competitive price. I just don't trust German reliability.
#39 of 389
Re: mazda 3 vs vw rabbit [steven39] by qddave
Oct 23, 2006 (8:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steven39 (Oct 20, 2006 6:03 pm)

be sure to check the tire pressures in the 3. when I bought mine, the pressure was at 35 all around. I could feel every little crack in the road. I dropped to 32 front 30 rear and all is well. what a difference a few psi make.
 
Dave
#40 of 389
Re: mazda 3 vs vw rabbit by coloradogoose
Oct 25, 2006 (10:34 pm)
Reply
Knowing that I was going to buy one or the other, I test drove both the Mazda 3 and the VW Rabbit. I drove the 3 in both the sedan and the hatch, and I drove the rabbit in the 2 door. While the Mazda was zippier feeling and quicker around corners, the VW had a smoother quieter ride. Interiors impressed me similarly and price was close enough so I had to decide based on use. I am a product rep and spend a lot of time on the highway, as well as on icy roads. The VW had a nicer feel for long trips and the ASR does a great job at keeping the wheels from spinning on the slick spots.
   I've heard all the issues about VW reliability, however we've had several VWs in the family that all lasted far longer than they should have. As far as Mazda goes, we've had three. One made it to 200,000 with barely more then frequent oil changes. One was on its third tranny when it was dumped and the other was on its second. Both were under 100,000 miles. Everyone can make a lemon, and most everyone can build a great car. I just picked what worked best for me.
#41 of 389
Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [ninjaman] by moparbad
Oct 26, 2006 (8:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: ninjaman (Sep 21, 2006 11:16 am)

ninjamanReliability probably goes to the Mazda3, but I don't think is as scary to own a vw as people say. Anyone can have a horror story with a car.
 
06 Golf had higher quality rating (fewer problems per vehicle)than Mazda 3 as rated by JD Power. It is expected that the Rabbit will have better quality than the Golf based on actual quality improvements seen in Europe when Golf IV model switched to Golf V model (Golf V = Rabbit).
 
Bottom line, reliability goes to VW Rabbit compared to Mazda 3.
#42 of 389
Re: t is expected that the Rabbit will have better quality than the Golf by funpg
Oct 26, 2006 (8:29 am)
Reply
Maybe. It sounds like a gamble until the car's been around for a few years.
#43 of 389
Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [moparbad] by aviboy97
Oct 26, 2006 (8:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Oct 26, 2006 8:17 am)

06 Golf had higher quality rating (fewer problems per vehicle)than Mazda 3 as rated by JD Power. It is expected that the Rabbit will have better quality than the Golf based on actual quality improvements seen in Europe when Golf IV model switched to Golf V model (Golf V = Rabbit).
 
You are forgetting that JD Powers rates vehicles based on "the first 90 day's of ownership". If you buy a new vehicle every 90 days, then the VW is for you. If you plan on owning the car longer then that, perhaps 5yrs or more, like the majority of vehicle owners, then the Mazda3 rates out better.
 
CR places VW next to last in reliability, only Mercedes-Benz rates lower, and Mazda is near the top.
 
Bottom line, reliability goes to VW Rabbit compared to Mazda 3.
 
I would reverse that conclusion.
#44 of 389
Re: Mazda3 2.3 vs. '07 VW Rabbit, auto & manual [aviboy97] by bodble2
Oct 26, 2006 (10:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Oct 26, 2006 8:54 am)

90 days, or over 5 years would, for me anyway, be at either end of the spectrum. What would matter to me would be how either would fare between 90 days and 5 years, since I normally do not keep a car for longer than 4 years (or in excess of 60K miles), give or take a few months. So, if someone says most VW would fall apart after 5 years or at 100K miles, that wouldn't faze me much.

Messages Page 5 of 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
40
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement