- #305 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [shirotori]
by bodble2
-
Jun 08, 2007 (10:16 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: shirotori (Jun 08, 2007 6:03 pm)
Hatchbacks are definitely more versatile. However, most of the time you can't really load a hatch up to the max because then you won't be able to see out the back!
|
- #306 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [socal2006]
by eldaino
-
Jun 11, 2007 (7:04 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: socal2006 (Jun 08, 2007 1:05 pm)
well, lightness is pretty much out the window, as the rabbit is just as heavy or if not heavier than other c class cars. While it may not have the cargo capacity of the fit or mazda 3, it does have better leg room than the 3 and has nicer materials inside than either.
Still a great buy.
|
- #307 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [eldaino]
by pianomanum
-
Jun 25, 2007 (7:14 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: eldaino (Jun 11, 2007 7:04 am)
I just test drove those two cars because I was on the fence. There was no comparison, the Rabbit won hands down. For starters, the VW was MUCH quieter while driving. I felt like I could hear everything on the road in the Mazda, and I had to raise my voice to talk to my wife. The Rabbit also felt much better on the road, including some acceleration superiority over the Mazda. All in all, the only thing I really liked about the Mazda in the end was the price including the options I wanted. I ended up paying just over $20k for the 4-door VW with a sunroof and 17" wheels (among other things), which was below invoice for the car itself.
|
- #308 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [pianomanum]
by eldaino
-
Jun 25, 2007 (7:28 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: pianomanum (Jun 25, 2007 7:14 am)
Awesome! great to have another 'dubber' on board! what kind of 17's did you get? and what color is your bunny?
|
- #309 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [pianomanum]
by aviboy97
-
Jun 26, 2007 (12:34 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: pianomanum (Jun 25, 2007 7:14 am)
There was no comparison, the Rabbit won hands down. For starters, the VW was MUCH quieter while driving. I felt like I could hear everything on the road in the Mazda, and I had to raise my voice to talk to my wife. The Rabbit also felt much better on the road, including some acceleration superiority over the Mazdajust test drove those two cars because I was on the fence.
Thats odd, in a recent test between the two, the Mazda won in every performance catagory, fuel economy, handling, breaking,0-60 and 1/4 mile. You name it, the Rabbit got beat. The only reason the Rabbit won was because of the "Gotta have it" factor. Which is totally subjective.
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/11873/2007-toyota-corolla-le-vs-2006-honda-civic-lx-vs-2007-hyundai-elantra-se-vs-2007-mazda-3s-touring-vs-2007-volkswagen-rabbit-vs-2007-nissan-sentra-20s.html
|
- #310 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [aviboy97]
by eldaino
-
Jun 27, 2007 (8:02 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 26, 2007 12:34 pm)
real world fuel economy actually only shows a very slight advantage in the mazda, surprising considering the vw's extra cylinder and bigger displacement.
the rabbit is a quieter more comfortable riding car, but it still has some sporting pretensions and its balanced perfectly in that sense. It does feel more solid on the road as well, at least when i compared the two on the highway.
looking at the spec sheet on the comparo you posted shows that while the mazda did excel in these fields, it is proven that rabbit was quieter and has a bigger top speed and better top gear acceleration than the 3. So they both have their strengths and weaknesses.
your car does not have to have the best 1/4 mile or 0-60 time to make it win ' hands down' in your book.
|
- #311 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [eldaino]
by aviboy97
-
Jun 27, 2007 (8:16 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: eldaino (Jun 27, 2007 8:02 am)
your car does not have to have the best 1/4 mile or 0-60 time to make it win ' hands down' in your book.
First, it's not my car Second, I was replying about how he said the Rabbit was a better performer. Actually, he said it was "superior", especialy in acceleration. I pointed out that a comparo was done that showed the Mazda won in those categories.
|
- #312 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [aviboy97]
by eldaino
-
Jun 27, 2007 (8:24 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 27, 2007 8:16 am)
First, it's not my car Second, I was replying about how he said the Rabbit was a better performer. Actually, he said it was "superior", especialy in acceleration. I pointed out that a comparo was done that showed the Mazda won in those categories.
come on avi how old are you? obviously you knew what i meant; when i said 'your' car, i mean 'ones' car, not that YOU have a mazda 3.
He wasn't going on and on about the superior performance in the rabbit; he said he noticed 'some superiority in acceleration' and in acceleration only. even this could mean the generous feeling of torque and not so much 'its quicker to 60!'.
The other ways he felt the rabbit exceled were with regards to the feel on the road, and the quiet cabin.
|
- #313 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [eldaino]
by aviboy97
-
Jun 27, 2007 (8:34 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: eldaino (Jun 27, 2007 8:24 am)
come on avi how old are you?
I'm a rebel teenager who has nothing better to do with my day then play on the internet!
I'm just havin' fun with you, eldaino!!
|
- #314 of 389
-
Re: Recent comparison [aviboy97]
by eldaino
-
Jun 27, 2007 (9:56 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Jun 27, 2007 8:34 am)
I'm a rebel teenager who has nothing better to do with my day then play on the internet!
I'm just havin' fun with you, eldaino!!
i know i know, its so easy to get me started!
its cool bro.
|