Sign In Join 



Traffic Laws & Enforcement Tactics

540 messages,  Last post on Sep 21, 2009 at 12:22 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires


Messages Page 54 of 55
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#523 of 540
in case you missed it in Bring Back 55 by steve_ HOST
Feb 11, 2008 (6:46 pm)
Reply
Canada looking at ways to cut down on speeding
 
Transport Canada is testing a speed limiting device on cars owned by habitual speeders. It's basically a gizmo that combines a GPS, speed-limit map, and an undisclosed way to manually override a car’s controls.
#524 of 540
. by fintail
May 05, 2008 (10:06 am)
Reply
Another brilliant idea from the WSDOT, with enforcement by the WSP - partners in crime - bound to go over like their previous lead-balloon of big dots on the road to aid in vehicle spacing. More money flushed away.
#525 of 540
Re: . [fintail] by oregonboy
May 05, 2008 (12:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (May 05, 2008 10:06 am)

This, I predict, will turn into a horrible mess. I drove through that section on Saturday, and the signage was confusing at best. The rates change moment to moment and are posted every mile or two AND THEY ARE CUMULATIVE. It is possible to rack up over $9.00 in tolls in just a few miles if you remain in the toll lane during HOV hours.
 
And when are HOV hours? During designated rush hours Monday through Friday and anytime the "average speed" on the highway drops below 45MPH. In other words... you never know for certain.
 
Also, "The lane continues to remain free to cars with two or more passengers". So how do they know whether or not to charge your transponder account for the toll, unless they have someone looking at each vehicle as it passes each toll section???
 
 
Of course, if you are inadvertently charged in error, I'm sure that it will be a simple matter to have the overcharges reversed.
 
james (happy that he rarely drives that route)
#526 of 540
Re: . [fintail] by euphonium
May 05, 2008 (3:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (May 05, 2008 10:06 am)

We can kick the idiots out of office come November including all members of the Legislature who voted for this plus the Governess who signed the authorization.
 
Why does one political party strive to increase or have more taxes?
#527 of 540
Re: . [euphonium] by fintail
May 05, 2008 (4:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (May 05, 2008 3:31 pm)

The entire system needs an overhaul...choosing the identical clown in a different suit won't help much. Rossi or Gregoire (or weasely crony capitalist McGavick) - what would really change? I haven't seen any viable transportation infrastructure plans from either side of the aisle.
 
One side does like to talk of cutting taxes...but they never have the guts to cut spending in the long run...and spending is the problem
#528 of 540
Re: . [oregonboy] by fintail
May 05, 2008 (4:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oregonboy (May 05, 2008 12:49 pm)

I want to know how much the signage cost, along with the road modifications, and how long those costs will take to be recouped from the tolls (not from our badge-wearing revenue collectors cherry picking along the route). Tens of thousands were burned on the road dots project...this little idiot festival cost seven figures I have no doubt.
 
I heard on the radio by using these lanes one could have saved up to 10 minutes at the height of the morning rush. Wow!
 
405 and 167 are some of the most ridiculous roads in the northwest - barely updated while population has tripled, and a paradise for LLCs and those without situational awareness.
#529 of 540
Reaportion the gas tax so more $ is applied to roads by euphonium
May 06, 2008 (8:38 am)
Reply
& expect the ferry system to be more self supporting. Riding the Bremerton Ferry is the most bang for the buck as far as subsidizing rural living is concerned. WSP patroling the ferries? What's the speed limit on the car deck to be enforced?
 
The gas tax is to be applied to where the gasoline is used, there would be a lot of $ available to build more highways, lay more concrete, and cross more streams without raising the gas tax any more. The EV and GW nuts need to understand they too are to honor the automobile and as such promote and provide for it.
#530 of 540
Re: Reaportion the gas tax so more $ is applied to roads [euphonium] by fintail
May 06, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (May 06, 2008 8:38 am)

It'd be cool to see 5M not blown on consultants every time a transportation development is planned, too. They spend money like it's monopoly money.
 
Pretty soon WA will have both the highest gas taxes in the country, and toll roads.
#531 of 540
Re: Reaportion the gas tax so more $ is applied to roads [fintail] by paisan
May 06, 2008 (4:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (May 06, 2008 9:32 am)

Cry me a river. The bridges in NY/NJ cost anywhere from $4.50 to $9 to cross over. The NJTP and GSP Tolls are nothing to slack at either.
 
-mike
#532 of 540
Re: Reaportion the gas tax so more $ is applied to roads [paisan] by fintail
May 06, 2008 (5:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (May 06, 2008 4:46 pm)

What's the gas tax there? That was always the WA state excuse to not have tolls - the taxes are the highest in the US, so it makes up for it. Not anymore.
 
When the new bridges across Lake Washington are built, they will carry similar tolls.

Messages Page 54 of 55
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement