Sign In Join 



Traffic Laws & Enforcement Tactics

540 messages,  Last post on Sep 21, 2009 at 12:22 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires


Messages Page 32 of 55
1
...
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#304 of 540
Re: Traffic ticket system [scape2] by avs007
Mar 09, 2007 (3:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: scape2 (Mar 01, 2007 9:12 pm)

As she was exiting she noticed an officer with his lights on and he was after her! She was surprised and pulled over. The officer told her he clocked her doing 70MPH!!?? She asked the officer how could I be doing 70 in an exit lane with cars all around me doing 40-50 and slowing down??
 
Similar thing happened to my wife a year or two ago... She was going down the hill by our house in 2nd gear. She was doing about 34 in a 35 in 2nd gear.
 
There is one of those electronic signs, that shows your speed on the way down... Officer was hiding behind some bushes, facing the sign... He whipped out, and ticket my wife for doing 50 in a 35, when she was doing 34, because he said the sign said 50.
 
Wife tried to explain she was doing 34, but cop said she was lying...
 
So I took out the video camera, and made a video... I drove 35 during the entire video... First I had my wife come down the hill about 20 seconds behind me, doing 50... Then I drove back up the hill, and went down again, and had my wife come from the opposite direction doing 35, and then accelerate to 50 after she passed me.
 
(As a precaution, I removed the front plates of my wife's car when making this video...)
 
Anyways, in the video, I showed that the whole time I was going 35, but the electronic sign showed 35, but then started racing up to 50, even though there were no cars between me and the sign, and even though there was still a good deal of distance between me and the sign...
 
Judge threw out the ticket, but than harassed us about the video, saying it's unsafe to be driving and fiddling with a camera at the same time.
 
I made sure not to say anything in the video, and just show the speedo and the view out front, without revealing any identifying information about who was driving, or what we were driving. With how irritated the judge got, I'm sure he would've tried to ticket us for making this video...
 
But this is one of the main reasons I hate photo radar...
#305 of 540
Re: Lemko out there? [stickguy] by imidazol97
Mar 09, 2007 (3:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Mar 08, 2007 9:07 pm)

In Dayton the politicians bought the idea that they could make money under the pretense of making all intersections safer by putting cameras at a few. Oddly the cameras only are set up for the main thoroughfare which out-of-towners may travel who don't know there are cameras there; they do not watch the cross street traffic. The ones I see are in drug, drinking, dangerous areas where I'm more worried about being hit by cross street traffic that doesn't stop than I am worried about someone on the main road running the light immediately after it turns as it turns red.
 
The other intersections around those have MORE people running the red lights because they know there is no camera. And of course there're no policemen watching action at those other intersections. Guess they're at the donut-coffee shops or talking to their girls in the alleys because there's a camera making the city safe.
 
The Scottsdale AZ company is just raking in the money. They get $60 and the city gets $15. Guess which policitians are bad negotiators. They don't even negotiate away driver's rights well.
#306 of 540
Re: Traffic ticket system [avs007] by pf_flyer HOST
Mar 09, 2007 (4:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: avs007 (Mar 09, 2007 3:01 am)

That IS the weak spot in radar, target tracking. It's not that the radar isn't accurate in reading speeds, but if multiple targets are in range, you have to be sure of which one it's reading.
#307 of 540
Re: Traffic ticket system [pf_flyer] by 210delray
Mar 09, 2007 (5:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (Mar 09, 2007 4:40 am)

Agree, I've have some experience using a radar gun, not as a cop, but as a researcher.
 
Radar is indiscriminate -- if you aim the gun at a pack of vehicles, it tends to pick out the fastest and/or largest one, like a tractor-trailer. The problem is you can't be certain WHICH vehicle's speed is being displayed.
 
OTOH, if say there are only 3 or 4 cars near each other, and one is clearly going faster than the others (by visual observation), the radar gun will almost always show the highest speed, corresponding to the car going the fastest.
 
The key point is that using the radar gun has to be coupled with visual observation.
#308 of 540
targets by stickguy
Mar 09, 2007 (4:22 pm)
Reply
I remember an article from a few years (maybe a lot of years!) in C&D IIRC where they tested radar detectors. They also did some tests on radar guns.
 
Well, one of the tests was to clock a car failrly close (couple of hundred yards?) The trick was, there was a tractor trailer way back, where it really wasn't in sight yet. So common sense would tell the cop he was clocking the car, right?
 
Well, the truck had such a big radar signature, that the radar was clocking the truck, not the car. Tought me to never trust radar guns. That, and to always take the truck lanes on the turnpike, to use them as cover!
#309 of 540
Re: Lemko out there? [imidazol97] by rockylee
Mar 10, 2007 (1:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Mar 09, 2007 3:41 am)

Well you could always buy that spray in the can that claims to make it next to impossible for those radar camera's to read your plates. I always wondered if that stuff really works ?
 
Rocky
#310 of 540
cameras by stickguy
Mar 11, 2007 (9:59 am)
Reply
saw an episode of mythbusters the other day that dealt with speed cameras. They tried everything, and the only trick they found that beat them was the old rotating license plate trick that James Bond had on his AM!
 
Even had no problem getting a clear shot at a Lambo that was doing ~140. Sprays, covers, nada.
 
I think not washing your car and keeping mud strategically placed is a good idea..
#311 of 540
Re: cameras [stickguy] by imidazol97
Mar 11, 2007 (11:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Mar 11, 2007 9:59 am)

I saw that too. They didn't use the high-powered strobes like in some of the traffic company cameras. And they used what looked like a 35 mm. camera with a regular add on flash.
 
The license plate cover and sprays are supposed to react to the high strobe power and turn opaque.
#312 of 540
Re: cameras [stickguy] by andre1969
Mar 12, 2007 (8:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Mar 11, 2007 9:59 am)

I think not washing your car and keeping mud strategically placed is a good idea..
 
With the cameras they use in Maryland, at least, I know two tricks that will beat the camera. One is to drive a pickup truck, and leave the tailgate down. That'll block the view of the plate from the camera. Or, so I've been told. I've never tried it with my truck, but I've heard that it works, and it seems it would make sense.
 
Another is to drive a tractor trailer. The cameras in MD are set up to take pictures of the tags on something roughly car-sized. Something overly long, like a tractor trailer, will get its pictures taken at times when the license plate won't be in range. A cop told me that one.
 
Of course, neither of these strategies is the most practical in the world, for most people!
 
Oh, and while mud or something else on your license plate would be good for confusing the cameras, if a cop happens to notice it, he can pull you over and give you a ticket. Or at least a warning. And sometimes if they get a partial license plate match, they're still going to send out a ticket to whomever they think it is, whether it's the guilty party or not. I remember hearing about some old lady who had an 80's Celebrity that was still tagged, but hadn't moved under its own power in years. They got a partial match on a license plate, and her plate was the closest match they could come up with, so they mailed her a ticket!
 
I dunno the outcome of it, though.
#313 of 540
Re: cameras [andre1969] by imidazol97
Mar 12, 2007 (9:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Mar 12, 2007 8:40 am)

Do any of you know if the spray on coatings or the license plastic covers actually do work with real cameras and real flash units?

Messages Page 32 of 55
1
...
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement