Sign In Join 



Fit vs. Rabbit

167 messages,  Last post on Feb 27, 2007 at 10:31 AM

You are in the Volkswagen Rabbit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Honda Fit, Volkswagen Rabbit, Hatchback


Messages Page 15 of 17
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#138 of 167
Re: moparbad [nippononly] by grumpyoldman1
Feb 15, 2007 (6:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jun 11, 2006 4:29 pm)

Local honda dealer had a fully loaded fit in stock.
Took a test drive and was about ready to write a check.
Just wanted to drive a rabbit first just to be sure. Needless to say I know own a rabbit.
 
I dearly miss my old civic hatchbacks and would have bought a civic hatch if they let the U.S have one. But the fit is not a civic hatch.
REALLY happy with the rabbit.
#139 of 167
Re: moparbad [grumpyoldman1] by thegraduate
Feb 20, 2007 (9:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: grumpyoldman1 (Feb 15, 2007 6:49 pm)

Glad you like your Rabbit, although it is a very different vehicle from the Civic Hatch (which was very light and economical). As a matter of fact, the Rabbit weighs more than my Accord, and gets worse mileage to boot. It has lots of great features, but it isn't an economy car. That's probably both a good thing, and a bad thing.
#140 of 167
Re: moparbad [thegraduate] by chrono
Feb 22, 2007 (2:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 20, 2007 9:48 am)

Economical is such a relative word. I would definately agree that the Rabbit is heavy but it's more competative in mpg then you present it to be. If you look at the new 2008 EPA ratings the Rabbit is getting 19/28 while the Accord gets 21/31. Not too big a difference. Factor in the Rabbit has one more cylinder and more torque to boot. Check out ratings for other compact cars with similiar displacement such as the Cobalt, Mazda3 S or Impreza the mpg ratings are pretty close. Seriously, the Rabbit is just as economical to equivalent cars of size and displacement. Back to the discussion, the Fit is definately more economical then the Rabbit. The two cars are related only in shape and starting price point.
#141 of 167
Re: moparbad [chrono] by thegraduate
Feb 22, 2007 (2:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chrono (Feb 22, 2007 2:24 pm)

Where'd you find the 2008 ratings? I'd love to see.
 
Also, you mention the Accord only gets 3MPG better. Remember, you are comparing a compact hatch to a midsize sedan, and the midsize sedan is STILL getting better mileage!
 
The EPA link would be MUCH appreciated on these boards, Puh-leeeeeease?
#142 of 167
2008 TDI Rabbit by moparbad
Feb 22, 2007 (8:45 pm)
Reply
The new diesel engine is expected to provide 60 mpg highway and significantly higher HP than the previous TDI with the new one at 140HP.
#143 of 167
link by dudleyr
Feb 23, 2007 (9:48 am)
Reply
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
#144 of 167
Re: link [dudleyr] by thegraduate
Feb 23, 2007 (8:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dudleyr (Feb 23, 2007 9:48 am)

Thanks.
 
That info is surprising. I thought the highway numbers would go up, and the city numbers go down, considering i get upper 30s pretty regularly on pure highway trips, and have topped 40 MPG twice. This, in my 34 MPG Hwy rated Accord I-4.
#145 of 167
Re: 2008 TDI Rabbit [moparbad] by shirotori
Feb 25, 2007 (10:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: moparbad (Feb 22, 2007 8:45 pm)

and when may we be expecting this vehicle to be available for purchase?
#146 of 167
Re: funny [nippononly] by eldaino
Feb 26, 2007 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Aug 24, 2006 6:09 am)

and then we can go on to say that car and driver put the rabbit on the top of their list, bouncing right past several very strong contenders including the civic and 3.
 
A civic hatch a slam dunk? Yeah honda gave us one and everyone (not me) hated it. It seems that when we get what we ask for we flame it anyway. and the only problem with the last civic hatch was that it had si on the front an back when it should have just said 'ex'. (or ex se or something to point out that the engine was different and not just another body style.)
 
The current civic hatches in europe in my opinoin look amazing. But the styling is way too, how should i put this...un-american honda for it to be welcomed with open arms. Again i think it looks great, but i can imagine all the 'new civic hatch is horrendous' threads on this forum.
 
I personally am on the 'other' side of the spectrum, i would have loved a four door rabbit but ended up with a two door. I think its a little silly to say that the rabbit is a dealbreaker in four door guise when compared to the fit, of course it costs more, its not really a b list car; its a compact that starts out life in the b list price wise. Thats all. Ever see how no one gripes about how the mazda 3 hatch is so much more expensive over the fit? Its because they play in different playgrounds. Any non b list 4 door hatch will be cheaper than a mazda 3 or a rabbit 4 door. Its just nice knowing that the rabbit is attainable for that little.
#147 of 167
Re: moparbad [chrono] by eldaino
Feb 26, 2007 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: chrono (Feb 22, 2007 2:24 pm)

whole heartedly agreed.

Messages Page 15 of 17
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement