- #780 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [bvdj84]
by dpmeersman
-
Apr 29, 2009 (8:35 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Apr 29, 2009 8:01 am)
A DSG type transmission would be what I would choose. VW designed that as a manual transmission with automatic capabilities. Shifting exclusively with the paddle shifters would not be a strain on that transmission as this was the intent from the ground up. Most vehicles today offering paddle shifters have taken traditional automatic transmissions and provided the driver with the option of shifting using the paddles. As this was not their original mission, consistent use may cause problems with these transmissions. I'm only speculating here and can offer no hard facts. But I have test driven a recent VW GTI with the DSG and was very impressed with the vehicle overall and in particular the DSG/4 cyl turbo combo. The new model hitting show rooms this fall looks to be an improvement over an already very capable vehicle.
|
- #781 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [bvdj84]
by ezshift5
-
Apr 29, 2009 (10:06 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Apr 29, 2009 5:29 am)
......I am ready for some power!! While still being efficient.
.........the numbers inherent to my 6M underscore your words above.....................
To 60 <6.0 seconds; 1/4-mile circa 14.5 on an abusive (to the clutch) launch....... In the flat AZ desert - 2200 rpm/cruise/no ac/87 octane/6th gear overdrive - i have broken the 40 MPG barrier............ best, ez.........
|
- #782 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [ezshift5]
by gyusher
-
Apr 29, 2009 (11:25 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: ezshift5 (Apr 29, 2009 10:06 am)
I still like my 08 4 cyl EX-L coupe especially now after my first oil change. The car feels like she has 20 more HP at least. . . Why I know not unless that 'break-in' oil was just too heavy and the 5-20 M1 I use is much thinner. Anyway she's much perker now.
I just about traded her for a V6 Rav 4. . . The V6 Rav 4 will smoke the V6 Accord. Biggest sleeper going. . . . Toyota says the V6 Rav 4 is their fastest accelerating vehicle. Faster than a Mustang GT. . .
Anyway I decided to keep my Honda. . . I know the V6 is sexier, faster and better equipped but my little 4 banger grows on you. . .
|
- #783 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [gyusher]
by stephen987
-
Apr 29, 2009 (12:31 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: gyusher (Apr 29, 2009 11:25 am)
Faster than a Mustang GT
I know this particular forum isn't where this challenge belongs, but I have to say that seems like a stretch. The numbers I've seen for the Mustang are 0-60 in the low fives. I would expect the V6 RAV4 to be around six seconds flat, since it weighs about the same as a V6 Camry (2wd RAV=3560 lbs, Camry V6 SE=3483 lbs per Toyota website).
|
- #784 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [gyusher]
by blufz1
-
Apr 29, 2009 (8:13 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: gyusher (Apr 29, 2009 11:25 am)
Why would you trade an 08 car in? The fewer cars you own in your life the more $ you will have.
|
- #785 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [stephen987]
by thegraduate
-
Apr 29, 2009 (8:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: stephen987 (Apr 29, 2009 12:31 pm)
RAV4 = 6.9 sec
Mustang V8 = 5.2 sec
|
- #786 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [gyusher]
by bvdj84
-
Apr 30, 2009 (3:46 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gyusher (Apr 29, 2009 11:25 am)
Yes, but keep the Accord! It definitely grows on you, and Honda makes an awesome 4cyl. GM cannot keep throwing Honda in their commercials and remotely compare the differences in their 4cyl engines. NO WAY!! Their cars could get better mileage, but the Accord is rated usually for better mileage than what it is posted, and will most definitely be more consistent over time. My 08 G6 4cyl engine is a piece of crap! Either something is wrong with my transmission/engine or that is honestly the way it is supposed to be. I am having the service center look at it.
I truly miss the Honda 4cyl I had on the 06 Accord. Be glad you have a nice Honda!
keep it! I would trade out for my Honda back in a heart beat. I am brain storming of ways to get out of my G6 now. I want out now!
|
- #787 of 819
-
Re: LX vs EX L4 Engine Differences [bvdj84]
by dpmeersman
-
Apr 30, 2009 (4:30 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Apr 30, 2009 3:46 am)
In considering your next purchase/lease the type of terrain you usually drive in should be factored in when deciding on the 4 or 6 cyl. If you decide to go with the Accord it's larger size & weight require more torque to climb steep inclines. So your going to find yourself getting more aggressive with the throttle. If you visit the real world mpg in this forum a lot of 4 cyl owners under these conditions are reporting less than expected mpg's. The 6 cyl will return equal or slightly better fuel economy in hilly terrain. If your driving is mostly level terrain the excellent Honda 4 cyl will be more than adequate.
|
- #788 of 819
-
4 cyl mileage
by gyusher
-
Apr 30, 2009 (11:17 am)
-
|
|
I just now have 8K on my 08 4cyl Coupe. My average mpg is right at 23. . . I would think it could be better but I'm not complaining. on the big road she will get 30 at 70+ but my route to work and back although about 80/20 hwy/city the traffic level makes it more like 100 city. . .
|
- #789 of 819
-
Re: 4 cyl mileage [gyusher]
by acar1
-
May 02, 2009 (8:46 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: gyusher (Apr 30, 2009 11:17 am)
My commute is also about 80/20 highway city; about 30 miles each way. Plenty of traffic here in the DC metro area. My 350 HP, 6 speed Corvette delivers 25-26 mpg on average. True, I short shift to save fuel but even at 1500 RPM (about 70 mpg in 6 gear) my 'Vette still can move better than your I4 Accord. Honda's I4 engine is not well matched to the new, corpulent Accord. Platform sharing with the TL makes the Accord a V6 car.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans 
