Sign In Join 



Honda Civic 2006-2007 Issues

1193 messages,  Last post on Nov 18, 2009 at 12:13 PM

You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Brakes, Engine, Oil, Steering, Suspension, Transmission, Coupe, Sedan


Messages Page 79 of 120
1
...
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
...
120
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#777 of 1193
Vibration and Tire Wear by jcampa
Jan 31, 2008 (6:43 pm)
Reply
I am writing you about a concern and issue that I am having to endure with American Honda Motor Corporation. In August of 2006, I purchased a Honda Civic for better gas milage, safety and reliability for my wife and two kids from Bob Howard Auto-Mall in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. What my wife and me did not know at the time of purchase was that American Honda had installed bad control arms on the rear of the vehicle which caused the tires to wear out on the sidewalls more rapidly, thus causing flats and possibly blowouts on the rear wheels.
  
In September of 2007, my wife experienced a flat tire while doing errands around the City of Canyon and Amarillo, Texas, the tire was replaced and a new one was purchased from Walmart due to undue wear on the sidewalls.
  
In October of 2007, this car experienced another flat tire on the other side and this time the car was taken to Discount Tire here in Amarillo, Texas. The service manager indicated that the tires were wearing wrong on the side walls and that the car had a serious alignment problem. The dealership was contacted and James the service representative for Bob Howard Auto-Mall indicated that the control arms on the rear of the car were defective and that this flaw was causing the tires to wear out on the side walls.
  
He also indicated that there was no fix to the car at that time and that it could be as late as December 2007, before a fix is made to the car. As of the January 18, 2008, there is still no fix for this flaw. I was contacted by the dealership and Honda America still does not have a fix. Let everyone know do not buy a Honda.
  
As for the tires, James indicated that we should contact American Honda for reimbursement of the tires that were purchased at Discount Tire by American Honda in California. They were contacted and a check was reimbursed to us for approximately 375.00 dollars of the approximate 750.00 dollars that had already been spent. During both flats the car was driven over curbs to get the vehicle out of the road ways. And on either the first or second occurrences damage was done under the automobile that causes the brake light to flash while going down the highway.
  
The car was taken to Southwest Honda in Amarillo, Texas and they indicated that damage was done to the undercarriage of the automobile and that my warranty would not cover the damage that was done. It was explained to them that the damage was done due to the flats on the rear tires and that due to safety concerns of not changing the tires in the middle of the road, I had to go over the curb to get out of the traffic flow instead of changing it and causing an unsafe condition for other drives and myself. Honda America is uncooperative and unwilling to help us in resolving this issue. They implied that we should have been killed or hurt because of this flaw, before they will do anything to resolve this issue.
  
Conclusions:
 
This car has a serious flaw and American Honda knew it and deceived the American public into believing that the car is safe and free from defects, this car was represented to us as not having any problems or flaws or defects. However, Honda America sold a vehicle that has rear control arms that are defective and need to be replaced before a serious accident happens with these automobiles.
  
Customers are unaware of this flaw who bought this car believing that Honda produced a safe product, however what will happen when someone is traveling at 60 mph or even 70 mph, and a blow out occurs. Does someone have to lose their life or their family before something is done by Honda America and these companies like Honda America is held accountable.
  
Do not buy a Honda and Get the word out. Buy Toyota and call Honda and complain
#778 of 1193
Re: Vibration and Tire Wear [jcampa] by kero1
Jan 31, 2008 (6:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jcampa (Jan 31, 2008 6:43 pm)

Sorry to hear about your problems.
 
I so thankfully traded my civic with 16K miles a few months and it was the best decision I made regardless of the bath I took on the trade.
 
I can't believe all the problems people are still having with their cars.
 
I went back to subaru, the impreza is a great little car, my second one and I won't switch ever again unless subaru goes the way of honda with cars like the civic.
#779 of 1193
Re: Vibration and Tire Wear [jcampa] by drmbb
Feb 01, 2008 (7:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: jcampa (Jan 31, 2008 6:43 pm)

The rear camber issue is a known, and acknowledged problem. Honda issued a TSB about this last year, and has fixed the problem under warrenty for those who complained about it. You can read the Canadian TSB at:
 
http://showcase.netins.net/web/reptiles/stuff/Bulletin(VIII-10-07).pdf
 
and in the US the TSB number is 08-001, but I don't have a bookmark to read it online. You should be able to read it on Honda's Owner's Link web site, if you and your car is registered.
#780 of 1193
Re: Vibration and Tire Wear [drmbb] by jcampa
Feb 01, 2008 (11:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: drmbb (Feb 01, 2008 7:41 am)

The dealship has indicated that the fix did not work, they were still getting tire wear.
#781 of 1193
Driver side door trim by mrcaveman
Feb 09, 2008 (6:06 am)
Reply
Honda civic 2006 LX:
 
I had to have the driver side trim, the one that goes around the car frame at about 11,256 miles as it had the come aprarts, ( the rubber sill was deteriorating) at the center door frame. I am not sure how long it was bad as you normaly don't even look at it. For some reason it caught my eye on this day. The dealer said it looked like it was caused by me rubbing it when I get into the car. I told him to watch as I get in the car as I don't even come close to it. I felt it was a alinement problem. He said he would replace it only one time under warnanty. Well 6000 miles later I noticed it again. Totally deteriorated for about 8". Big chuck missing. Anyone else having this problem. Thanks
 
CP
#782 of 1193
Re: Driver side door trim [mrcaveman] by kathyc1
Feb 09, 2008 (6:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: mrcaveman (Feb 09, 2008 6:06 am)

Was this a sedan? Also, I think this would be a 3 times and your out situation for a lemon law wouldn't it? The dealer can't just replace it once under warranty if it's a continuing problem can he?
#783 of 1193
Re: Vibration and Tire Wear [jcampa] by kathyc1
Feb 09, 2008 (7:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: jcampa (Feb 01, 2008 11:41 am)

I have a question concerning mileages on this issue. I now have 5,000 miles on my '07 coupe and will be taking it into the dealer on the 13th for oil change and to have this problem looked at. They said they'll put it up on the hoist and take a look, but at 5,000 miles they may not be able to tell anything. Also, if they have it off the ground can they tell if the cambers were replaced by looking for the little "c" on them or will it take a major job to get to them? I haven't noticed anything when driving, but the roads in our little town are not the best and very bumpy with pot holes after a major storm. According to jcampa, replacing them may not make a difference anyway. Thank you.
#784 of 1193
Trunk gap not symmetrical by moonlily
Feb 10, 2008 (6:02 pm)
Reply
I have a 2007 Honda Civic sedan with 15,000 miles. After purchasing the car, I noticed that the gap on the driver's side of trunk is narrower than the passenger's side. The trunk does not rub up against the car body, and I haven't noticed any trunk leaks. The trunk also latches securely. The car is still under warranty, so should I see about getting it aligned properly, or would I be opening myself up to new problems by having it worked on? My main concern is if the gap increases slightly more on the right, I could possibly have a rain problem? Or if the gap narrows more on the other side, the trunk could touch the taillight housing. Opinions, please?
#785 of 1193
Re: Vibration and Tire Wear [kathyc1] by targettuning
Feb 11, 2008 (3:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: kathyc1 (Feb 09, 2008 7:08 am)

The camber is an alignment adjustment. It is not a part that is or can be replaced. If you were to look at your car head (or tail) on and imagine an imaginary line through the center of the tire vertically) the difference between the tilt of the wheel/tire assembly from top to bottom is the camber setting. This setting is made in thousands of an inch so you will not be able to eyeball the tire and see anything. If you are concerned about tire wear your car needs to be placed on an alignment machine with a competent operator to be checked for both camber and toe-in.
#786 of 1193
Re: Vibration and Tire Wear [targettuning] by cz75
Feb 11, 2008 (7:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: targettuning (Feb 11, 2008 3:59 am)

SPC makes adjustable rear control arms (~$300/set) that allow camber adjustment, as well as front camber bolts (~$25/set). All are good quality parts.

Messages Page 79 of 120
1
...
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
...
120
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement