You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Toyota 4Runner
Subaru Outback vs. Toyota 4Runner

20 messages, Last post on Nov 19, 2006 at 12:29 AM
You are in the Toyota 4Runner Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: rsholland (Nov 18, 2006 6:48 am) -mike
|
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Nov 18, 2006 10:30 am) Just by doing that allows for engineers to package items differently. That in turn may open up more space for relocating (or re-designing) other items such as the fuel tank, exhaust, etc. Now I may not be 100% accurate with specifics here, but I think you see my point. The fact of the matter is that all the SUVs and crossovers with IRS seem to have more 3rd-row seating room than those with solid rear axle setups. Now, having said that the Dodge Durango/Chrysler Aspen (not Jeep!) SUVs do pretty well with rear seating and legroom space, with a fold-into-the-floor rear seat, despite having a solid rear axle. If Dodge and Chrysler can do it, I don't understand why GM couldn't do it? I sat in the rear of a new Tahoe yesterday, and because the rear floor (for my feet) was so high my knees were close to my chin. I doubt that's the case with your Armada. The Armada's rear footwell is lower because there is no room needed for vertical travel of the driveshaft, therefore the footwell can be deeper. That in turn benefits the 3rd-row passengers. Bob |
|
|
on the Armada is actually usable by full size paisan adults (2 of em) for up to 1-1.5hr trips. I'm not sure if that's because the roof is so high or the floor is low though. -mike |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Toyota 4Runner
Subaru Outback vs. Toyota 4Runner
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
1991 Subaru XT
2010 Toyota 4Runner



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats