Sign In Join 



C6 Corvette vs 987 Boxster

34 messages,  Last post on Mar 28, 2009 at 9:12 PM

You are in the Porsche Boxster & Boxster-S Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Corvette, Porsche Boxster, Coupe


Messages Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1 of 34
C6 Corvette vs 987 Boxster (base) by blacktalon
Nov 13, 2005 (7:53 pm)
Reply
Yeah, I know. Very different cars.
 
Still, since they're both purpose-built sports cars at a similar price point, I'm curious whether anyone has driven and/or cross-shopped both.
 
Of course, the Corvette is much, much faster and the Boxster is much more refined. I'm not asking about 0-60 times or the quality of interior materials, but more the subjective "fun-to-drive" factor.
 
Both cars are built to be fun and exciting. Which put more of a smile on your face?
#2 of 34
Re: C6 Corvette vs 987 Boxster (base) [blacktalon] by starrow68
Nov 16, 2005 (11:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: blacktalon (Nov 13, 2005 7:53 pm)

My drive in the Boxster was admittedly only about 20 minutes and I've now had the '02 Vette Coupe for 4 years but the smile question is a function of what you want to get out of it. To be harsh, I didn't think the Boxster was all that great and too tight for me anyway. I read about how great a handling car it is but I'm becomming convinced that those comments come from tests on autocross or cart tracks that are very tight. Even the Boxster S is not going to touch a stock engine C5 Corvette, much less a C6, when on a road course or for that matter a back country road that has some room to run between corners. The tenths you make up at the corner is not going to add up to much compared to the seconds you lose between the corners. I'm sure both put a smile on many people, I'd say get out and drive used ones and see what gets your smile going!
 
My smile is pretty wide today, just into the 2:00.8 range at Sears Point main road course with a stock engine C5 coupe on street tires. I did have fun dicing with a track prep coil over Boxster S on race tires but after he let me by I was able to pull about a second per lap faster and we were both passing 911's by the boat load. He was surprised when we connected in the paddock that I was on 220 wear rating street tires but that should have been noticable since at that pace they scream a lot.
Randy
#3 of 34
Re: C6 Corvette vs 987 Boxster (base) [starrow68] by blacktalon
Nov 20, 2005 (8:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: starrow68 (Nov 16, 2005 11:32 am)

"I read about how great a handling car it is but I'm becoming convinced that those comments come from tests on autocross or cart tracks that are very tight"
 
Actually, my one experience driving a Boxster was on a tight autocross track. Handling through the slalom was amazing -- but that's probably not representative of the daily driving experience...
#4 of 34
I chose a Boxster by wild1poet2
Dec 28, 2005 (11:55 am)
Reply
I shopped a Boxster versus the Vette and chose the Boxster. Its a subjective decision at these levels unless you are going racing. I wanted the tighter, more intimate cockpit and shorter wheelbase for car jammin while commuting. Plus I like the styling in the Boxster versus the convertible Corvette. I love V8 torque and it just gets me into trouble.
#5 of 34
Re: I chose a Boxster [wild1poet2] by starrow68
Dec 28, 2005 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wild1poet2 (Dec 28, 2005 11:55 am)

"I love V8 torque and it just gets me into trouble."
 
You have no idea how much trouble it's gotten me into!
 
Enjoy the Boxster and if you are ever on track, enjoy the handling!
#6 of 34
Re: I chose a Boxster [wild1poet2] by designman
Dec 29, 2005 (6:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: wild1poet2 (Dec 28, 2005 11:55 am)

Yes, and if you don’t make it to the track but have the rare occasion to lope along on a winding road or jughandle, enjoy the handling there too. The Boxster can only do 159 mph… this combined with its renowned handling presents absolutely no temptation at all.
 

#7 of 34
by starrow68
Dec 29, 2005 (5:43 pm)
Reply
"The Boxster can only do 159 mph…"
  
But, how long would it take to get there? That is the
part of the equation that many former Boxster owners
have come to realize. Having never exceeded 165 mph,
I can say it got there pretty quick, and it wasn't a
Boxster!
#8 of 34
vetteman by vettewman
Jan 01, 2006 (7:15 pm)
Reply
the boxter and the vetter are two very different machinnes this is the perverbial comparrison of appes and oranges
the boxter is most of all a roadster whci classes with the bmw roadster the miatta and such cars the vette is an american classic muscle car one gets two very different experices from these cars which is meant vette class in porsche models would be 928 gts or gt carrera now you are comparing apples to apples
 
82 928 5sp
99 carrera 5sp
96 vette auto
#9 of 34
Re: vetteman [vettewman] by habitat1
Jan 02, 2006 (6:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vettewman (Jan 01, 2006 7:15 pm)

"99 carrera 5sp"
 
No such thing. 911 went to 6-speed transmission 4 years earlier in 1995.
#10 of 34
Not sure I'd want to compare the C4 to anything ... by starrow68
Jan 03, 2006 (12:13 pm)
Reply
in today's world. When it came out it had great performance but still was a tough ride and even worse for entry and exit. The C5 is a much more comfortable car and can be set up for reasonable track performance without much in the way of adders. It does pass most 911's and all but occasional Boxster with a really talented driver. Then both cars can be improved from stock, many do.
Randy

Messages Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement