You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Chevrolet Malibu
Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord

655 messages, Last post on Dec 07, 2009 at 8:11 AM
You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: anon3 (Jul 11, 2009 8:24 am) |
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Jul 11, 2009 8:46 am) I feel sorry for the Chevy salesman, but who created this "perception"? The "perception" I think is based on facts (cars that simply didn't measure up to the competition). Market perception has nothing to do with my opinion. The reality of owning and driving Accords and Malibus myself, has created my "perception" of them. As far as Consumer Reports and JD Powers in concerned, they had the 2001 Malibu as a "Recommended" car. I would not recommend that car to anyone. It seems "average" reliability, poor quality, and cheap materials, is good enough for CR. Not good enough for me.
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jul 11, 2009 10:54 am) So, considering the new Malibu is night and day different in terms of build and quality compared to the previous model would be too quick to say. It could go both ways. I am not sure. Time will only tell. It is a very sharp looking car with a great offering for the money. I can see why people like them. I am certainly not going to bash anyone for driving one either. I will most definitely be impressed by the car if you drive by. I like a lot of cars, but which ones I would drive is my opinion. Heck, I think this Saturn Aura that drives locally here is one sharp looking car. Would I ever get one? No. That is just me. So, I guess at this point it could go both ways. Perhaps GM will prove to do some great things! But, ask yourself this.....would GM be trying to change or doing the improvements now if they weren't forced to do so? Will they uphold these goals when no one is looking? |
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 04, 2009 11:03 am) |
|
|
Replying to: butch100 (Jul 12, 2009 5:52 am) The engine is still not running right. The transmission is a bit off. The gas mileage has improved since the new converter. Perhaps a bit more power, but still acts weird. Its intermittently happening. GM stated they'll back their warranty, well, I will use it. I think I have ran up about $1,500 or so in warranty bills. Over silly stuff. Never had that with my Accord or my other 2 VW leases. I do not have time to play games. I work to hard and pay too much to be messed around with. But, no car is perfect. But, this is my first GM car too. With great deals out, you really don't have to pay $30k for a Honda. I lease, so soon I will have a new car. I will look closely at the new Accord, Acura TSX, VW, or even a new camry. |
|
|
Replying to: butch100 (Jul 12, 2009 5:52 am) It will still be relevant. A 10 year old Accord will still be worth a couple thousand more than a 10 year old Malibu.
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jul 18, 2007 4:41 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: dmathews3 (Jul 12, 2009 8:06 am) |
|
Just checking the Kelly Blue Book value on 10 year old cars (99 models), on MSN Autos. The price range for a 99 Malibu was between $3000 and $3800, and the price range for a 99 Accord was from $5700 to $7500. It's actually more than I thought it would be.
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jul 12, 2009 10:20 am) Now, if you are going to keep it for many years, than its a decent move. But, GM still needs to convince us that is will hold up to time. You certainly don't see many GM cars around that are year 91 or so that start up each and everyday in the winter like our honda. Just because I won't drive another GM car and desperately want out, doesn't make it a bad choice for someone else. I am very much pampered with my car now, its just the engine that leaves me with a sour taste in my mouth.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Chevrolet Malibu
Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Toyota Camry
2010 Chevrolet Malibu
2010 Honda Accord



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats