Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord

643 messages,  Last post on Nov 29, 2009 at 6:32 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry, Chevrolet Malibu, Honda Accord, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 58 of 65
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
65
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#565 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [butch100] by bvdj84
Jul 04, 2009 (7:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: butch100 (Jul 03, 2009 9:22 am)

Honestly, I would not feel safe in a cobalt. It would simply crumble in an accident.
People looking for an Accord, are less likely to be looking at a Cobalt. Though, you may have more power in the Cobalt, the Accord and Cobalt are 2 different cars all together. Differences are greatly noted.
 
I have to agree, the 06 Accord 4cyl is a great engine, no race car, but had confidence, quality, power. You have to understand I came from this engine, to the GM 4cyl, and it is simply NIGHT and DAY difference. My 06 Accord would blow the my 4cyl GM engine away. Got better mileage too. But, then again people getting an Accord are not out looking to race a Cobalt either. I would never dream of racing my 06 Accord 4cyl. I truly babied that car. Atleast, if I did push my Accord to feel it pull a bit on the interstate, it didn't feel, sound like it was straining as the GM car does.
#566 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [bvdj84] by butch100
Jul 04, 2009 (8:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 04, 2009 7:30 am)

All cars are designed with "crumple zones" that will help dissipate energy in a crash. It's tough to compare Cobolt/Accord as they are totally different classes of car. Cobolt is an A to B basic transpo. where the accord is gotten to damm near the size of an Impala. It's a much nicer car than the Cobolt but for a lot more $$$ too..
#567 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [butch100] by thegraduate
Jul 04, 2009 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: butch100 (Jul 04, 2009 8:10 am)

The Cobalt gets a 4-star rating for the driver from the NTHSA, 3-stars on the side impact, with Side Airbags.
 
How about we talk about the Malibu instead of the Cobalt?
#568 of 643
Re: 4-bangers [vanman1] by tlong
Jul 04, 2009 (9:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: vanman1 (Jun 23, 2009 6:37 pm)

No fun if it has no power. They are fine for compacts but in a mid-size loaded up, forget it!
 
Disagree. I have a 2007 Mazda 5 (a micro-minivan, same platform as a Mazda 3). I also have a 2005 Acura TL, which is a 6 cyl. Guess what - the Mazda is more FUN to drive, as it is agile and has very tight steering. The Acura is a powerful highway cruiser and accelerates great (if you like that automatic lag when you punch it). But the Mazda is FUN.
#569 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [dmathews3] by elroy5
Jul 04, 2009 (9:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: dmathews3 (Jul 03, 2009 9:46 am)

If all you want from an engine is horsepower, you can get that at a low price. If you want refinement, power, smoothness, reliability, and efficiency, you will have to look a lot harder, and probably pay a little more. Fun is defined differently also. Some see light weight, tight steering, firm suspension, and a responsive gearbox as the attributes they require for "Fun". Some are even more demanding, and want power to go along with all the rest. The 7th gen Accord V6 is a great package that has all these qualities. I know past Malibu models have not been refined, agile, or very powerful. I find it hard to believe GM has suddenly learned how to get all these things right with one model. Maybe they have, but I seriously doubt it. Previous Malibus were good, when new. They aged quickly however, and the lack of refinement, and quality showed up in short order.
#570 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [elroy5] by bvdj84
Jul 04, 2009 (11:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: elroy5 (Jul 04, 2009 9:50 am)

Nice response! I agree! Exactly, that puts the fact on whether or not the New Malibu's guts are any different than the previous Malibu model? Is it magically better? Only time will tell. You can put on a pretty face, but when the soul is lacking, well it'll surely uncover itself later on.
 
There are many new models arriving, look appealing. But, all lead to that very same question. I am not convinced the whole package is there yet.
 
 I would love to compare these cars in say 5 years from now, see all their records, how their holding up. I would actually say, during the 5yrs, push a them a bit.
It would be an interesting look on how they stand up to time.
 
That would be a test for GM, to design a car that doesn't have silly parts going bad early in the game. I have already had a new catalytic converter replaced at 15,000miles, on my 08 GM. Oh, ya, and a window switch because I could not roll my windows down... Twice! I have had about 3 rentals, kept one for a week, others for 2 days or so.
#571 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [bvdj84] by cooterbfd
Jul 04, 2009 (5:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 04, 2009 11:03 am)

".....Nice response! I agree! Exactly, that puts the fact on whether or not the New Malibu's guts are any different than the previous Malibu model? Is it magically better? Only time will tell."
 
If what you mean by "guts" is the platform, the previous 2 Malibu's were W bodies, whereas the new Malibu is an epsilon platform. I believe the MAXX version was an epsilon as well.
#572 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [cooterbfd] by bvdj84
Jul 05, 2009 (7:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jul 04, 2009 5:13 pm)

Yes, but I was referring to its overall parts used. Which are probably all the same. Nothing too new. That will only shown in time.
#573 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [bvdj84] by cooterbfd
Jul 05, 2009 (8:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 05, 2009 7:15 am)

Oh, no. While the 2.4L is a carryover, the 6 sp auto and 3.6L v6 are new to the model. The V6 generally gets good reviews for an engine.
 
Where I think GM is missing it is the fact that while Toyota and Honda use 1 car for the $20-30K midsize price range (MSRP) Chevy uses 2. You can find a $30K Camry or Accord, but not a Malibu. That price range is left to the Impala, and that car sits on an antiquated platform. So, the Camcord can outclass it's GM competition on the high end with features, AND lay claim to the best selling models each year, because they use one model. I don't know about the last couple of years, but up to a couple years ago, Chevy was selling more cars in that category, just spread over 2 models (Malibu and Impala) instead of 1 (Camry or Accord).
 
So, the imports score on 2 fronts; Better equiping the high end ($24K and up) versions, plus having a more refined driveline on the lower end, AND the perception that they "must be better because they sell more" which they didn't, because it was spread over 2 models.
#574 of 643
Re: bvdj84 [cooterbfd] by elroy5
Jul 05, 2009 (12:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Jul 05, 2009 8:15 am)

I think, if you subtracted the fleet sales of the Impala, and Malibu (which are considerable), I they would still come up short, as far as consumer sales, compared to the Accord. It would probably be pretty close. I don't think sales numbers mean much in the "which car is better" debate any way. The fact is people will pay more for an Accord, because they think it's a better built car. I agree with this perception, but I know some people don't. They only way I will really be convinced the Malibu is much improved, is if I bought one myself. I'm not willing to take that chance right now.

Messages Page 58 of 65
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
65
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement