Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord

630 messages,  Last post on Jul 19, 2009 at 5:49 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry, Chevrolet Malibu, Honda Accord, Car Comparisons, Sedan


Messages Page 52 of 64
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
...
64
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#504 of 630
Re: Driving an Accord Rental--and I think I like it. [bwia] by vanman1
Oct 27, 2008 (6:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bwia (Oct 25, 2008 11:53 am)

Not sure which Malibu you have and which Accord you drove but my 3.6L looks amazing under the hood and the power / engine note is sweet.
#505 of 630
Re: After 3 months of shopping.. [vanman1] by bvdj84
Oct 27, 2008 (6:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vanman1 (Oct 27, 2008 6:36 pm)

I am not sure if GM can make an engine like the Accord. I have driven both the 2006 Accord 4cyl, and an 08 G6 4cyl, which is the same engine as the 4cyl Malibu, it is not as smooth, jumpy. If the GM 4cyl engine had a 5spd transmission, it would make a world of difference. Then, it could be claimed smooth. The 4cyl, almost jumps to rev up high, when sometimes you want to let it accelerate more slowly up to speed. So compared to the power the 2006 4cyl Accord I had, no way, does it compare. That engine was strong. But, now I am finding the GM engine to be better as I put more miles on it, but its that darn stubborn transmission that just really bugs me! It can't make up its mind, it'll a change a gear when I least expect it, I am like "wow, okay"Its weird. Other than its querky engine, I find the G6 appealing in its features, but the engine lowers its score big time. I could only imagine this same engine in the Malibu, which is bigger, with a 4spd transmission, boy wouldn't that be a fun ride. It would really throw the transmission for a loop. I am not just making all of this up, because I have driven both. Its how I feel about them. Its too bad, GM cars depreciate so badly, might as well put your money in a sink hole.
 
But, now days, yes, you can be pretty safe with about any car,
#506 of 630
Re: After 3 months of shopping.. [bvdj84] by vanman1
Oct 28, 2008 (3:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bvdj84 (Oct 27, 2008 6:52 pm)

6-speed now available on G6, Aura and Malibu on the 2.4L. Apparently it makes a big difference on smoothness and fuel economy which is now best in class on these models. Refinement is a step above in Malibus. the G6 is pretty old now and a bit dated.
 
That said, the Accord 4 banger is a nice one, probably about the best. I went for a V6 Malibu though, I will never be happy with 170 hp.
 
#507 of 630
Accord vs a Camry by djm2
Nov 11, 2008 (5:20 am)
Reply
Good morning all:
      Prior to owning my 2007 V6 XLE Camry, I owned a 2003 Honda 4 cylinder Accord, which I purchase from an estate sale with a full 100,000 mile Honda extended warranty! --------- I drove that vehicle till it reached about 90,000 miles, and I traded it for the 2007 Camry. I enjoyed the vehicle, but I had problems with the comfort of the front driver's seat. The wings on the back rest of the seat would catch my shoulders before my spine touched the back seat. On a long highway trip, I needed a Chiropractor to get out of the seat. The Toyota Camry has a wider backrest, and I no longer have this problem. I love the Camry, but I miss the four cylinder Honda Accord! The performance was GREAT!
  
     Yesterday, I had an occasion to visit a Honda dealership, and while I was there, I made it a point to sit in the front seat of a 2008 four door Honda Accord. The back rest of the driver's seat is wider than the 2003 Accord, and it is much more comfortable, but the bottom of the seat is STILL very hard! --- It is much harder than my Camry, and both vehicles have leather. When the 2009 Accords come into the dealership, I will try the driver's seat again as I really like the 4 cylinder Accord!
(I will be in the market for a new car next year! I will also look at an Impala and a 4 & 6 cylinder Camry.)
  
      The 2003 Accord was trouble free till it reached 50,000 miles. Thank God for the extended warranty. Honda put in about $3,300.00 dollars worth of repairs from 50,000 miles to 90,000 miles! I believe in extended warranties! The warranty cost the original owner $895.00!
 
     Best regards to all! ------------ Dwayne
#508 of 630
Re: Accord vs a Camry [djm2] by dmathews3
Nov 11, 2008 (6:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Nov 11, 2008 5:20 am)

What, I have been led on all these forums that Honda's and Toyota's were perfect and GM vehilces were the pits. Finally an honest person.
#509 of 630
Re: Accord vs a Camry [djm2] by vanman1
Nov 11, 2008 (5:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Nov 11, 2008 5:20 am)

Try out a Malibu also, the seats are very comfortable and the lumbar is perfect for me anyway. I drove 5 hours straight on Sunday and I felt great on arrival!
 
Nice change from my wife's van.
#510 of 630
Re: Accord vs a Camry [vanman1] by djm2
Nov 12, 2008 (1:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: vanman1 (Nov 11, 2008 5:31 pm)

Good Morning!
 
     You make an excellent point! ---- I will put the Malibu on my short list. ---- I think the Chevrolet Malibu now has a 6 speed automatic transmission on both the 4 & 6 cylinder engines. If this is correct, I would like to drive both vehicles. If the mileage is very similiar, I would pick the 6 cylinder, because the American manufacturer has never made a four cylinder engine that I liked! ------ My family once had a Ford, (fix or repair daily), Tempo that was complete garbage. Ford replaced the engine once under an extended warranty, and the second engine was on its way out when they traded it for a GM vehicle. (Yes, they did all the oil and filter changes at the dealer!)
 
     Best regards. ------------- Dwayne
#511 of 630
Re: Accord vs a Camry [djm2] by bvdj84
Nov 12, 2008 (6:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Nov 12, 2008 1:29 am)

I think with the new 6spd transmission, it will run much smoother. The 4spd literally suffocates the engine of its true power. It is like night and day difference between the GM 4spd 4cyl engine and the Accord 5spd 4cyl engine. The Accord is much more refined, you can get by more in the Accord 4cyl. I think if GM tuned the engine right with the 6spd, than you got a better fit. The 4spd 4cyl is so jumpy, and it changes gears when you least expect it. I am like, "uh, what are you doing?". It has decent power, but all in the upper range, and with limited gears, it wants to rev. That extra gear makes a difference. Because I have driven both.
#512 of 630
Re: Accord vs a Camry [djm2] by imidazol97
Nov 12, 2008 (12:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Nov 12, 2008 1:29 am)

>because the American manufacturer has never made a four cylinder engine that I liked!
 
There people go again, stereotyping current cars based on past experiences or talk. Go drive a Malibu. See what you think NOW.
 
Isn't the Honda a 5-speed automatic? You'd want the 6-speed from Malibu!
#513 of 630
by vanman1
Nov 12, 2008 (6:40 pm)
Reply
I drove both a 4 and a 6 cyl Malibu with the 6-speed. The 4 is just fine but the 6 made me smile and I like to smile. I went with the 6. More gas sure but I don't drive much so even when gas prices go back up (and I think they will in a year or two when this mess passes) it will be fine.
 
Nice thing with the Malibu is you can buy a top of the line LTZ with a I-4 which is not possible with most mid-size cars.

Messages Page 52 of 64
1
...
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
...
64
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement