You are here: Forums Sedans Chevrolet Malibu Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord

Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord

643 messages,  Last post on Nov 29, 2009 at 6:32 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry, Chevrolet Malibu, Honda Accord, Car Comparisons, Sedan

Messages Page 50 of 65 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 65 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#485 of 643 Re: My take. [personatech] by ctl Aug 29, 2008 (3:40 pm)
Replying to: personatech (Jul 29, 2008 11:48 am) Another funny thing. I agree with the comment below. But if you read consumer report, that great 2008 Accord I-4 engine drives slower (0-60) than both Altima and Camry (yes, that slow camry) and has worse average MPG (-3, -2) too. I guess a sporty handling together with louder road/engine noise make it feel faster? I was just surprised when I read that, from other sources too.   Most everyone's comments on the Camry are spot-on: looks a bit like a manatee, drives like a sofa, its 4-cylinder engine was anemic compared to the Accord, and it had less interior space than the Accord
#486 of 643 Accord vs. Malibu by csr67 Aug 29, 2008 (6:47 pm)
Being a frequent business traveler, I've had multiple opportunities to drive the new Malibu from rental fleets. All the Malibu's I've driven are the v6 LTZ trim. At first I was quite impressed on the overall car, being that it is made by GM. After driving a few, I started seeing the same old GM pattern, especially on rentals that had over 10k miles... Worn interior plastics, squeeks, rattles emerged on several of them. Overall, the Malibu did not hold up well and quickly lost its' luster in my eyes.   I took delivery of a new 2008 Accord v6 EXL Sedan last week. Loaded with everything but Nav., it was actually a little cheaper than I could have bought a Malibu LTZ using my GM vendor pricing and incentives. Hands down, the Accord beats the Malibu at everything. Much better interior quality, ride, and power delivery. Replies to this message: bvdj84 (Aug 30, 2008 6:49 am)
#487 of 643 Re: Accord vs. Malibu [csr67] by bvdj84 Aug 30, 2008 (6:49 am)
Replying to: csr67 (Aug 29, 2008 6:47 pm) Yes, though the new Malibu is a good step in the right direction, I really like it! But, the Accord takes all of that a step further. The engine in the Accord is much better as well. Though you see they have recycled many parts from other models in there line up. Just look and you will see them, but that is not saying that is bad, it is just showing nothing new. Just look at the interior of the Malibu and you will see it took many parts from the Pontiac G6, like seating, switches. That is okay, but I feel when I look at GM across the board, you have all these cars that are all basically the same, but with a different name. Its almost getting way out of hand with their duplicate cars. GM is making a better, quality products now, but when compared head to head with Accord, the Accord seems to offer a well rounded product, that simply takes it much further than the Malibu. And, the Accord cannot be found on some rental lot.   IF GM downsizes to smaller line up, and ditch the duplicate named cars, than perhaps money could be used to create a better product. Creating a better 4cyl engine!! Using better parts within the car.   With this said, the Malibu is nice, I really like it! The Accord Wins with its overall value and attention to detail.
#488 of 643 Re: None of the above [jerrywimer] by butch100 Aug 30, 2008 (8:30 am)
Replying to: jerrywimer (Feb 11, 2008 7:03 am) I own an '05 'Bu w/3.5 and it gets awesome gas mileage but you can't realistically expect the newer 3.6 to come close to the older 3.5's. The reason is the newer 3.6 is a multi-valve dual OHC design, so it breathes better and generates more HP. Chevy did this to make the new 'Bu competitive with the Accord/Altima/Camry and succeeded as the new 'Bu is more than a match for all, but you can't get extra power without burning more fuel so there is somewhat of a trade off involved. The 3.5 pushrod is not offered in the newer (08 and up) 'Bu's.. Replies to this message: bvdj84 (Sep 08, 2008 12:31 pm) vanman1 (Sep 25, 2008 6:33 pm)
#489 of 643 malibu vs accord 4cyl engines. by bvdj84 Sep 08, 2008 (12:31 pm)
Replying to: butch100 (Aug 30, 2008 8:30 am) I would like anyone to share, the differences in the new malibu 4cyl engine, and the Accord 4cyl engine. For those that have driven both. I would like to hear what people feel the differences are, including power, refinement, quality.   Thanks. Replies to this message: vanman1 (Sep 25, 2008 6:33 pm)
#490 of 643 After 3 months of shopping.. by vanman1 Sep 25, 2008 (6:28 pm)
I ended up with a 2008 Malibu 2LT with performance package that includes the 3.6L and 6-speed auto. I never had any intention of buying a Malibu but I was shocked after 2 tests as to how much I liked it. The interior is beautiful and unique features like XM Radio, OnStar and remote start made it stand out even more. I also couldn't believe how fast it was and how smooth the transmission shifts, smoother than any other car I drove.   There are a lot of good midsize sedans out there but no one shopping should skip over the new Malibu. The other great thing at least around my area, there aren't many around yet so I actually get some stares. Nice! Replies to this message: bibo2 (Oct 14, 2008 6:00 pm) beach15 (Oct 15, 2008 6:49 pm) bvdj84 (Oct 16, 2008 7:34 am) and 7 more...
#491 of 643 Re: malibu vs accord 4cyl engines. [bvdj84] by vanman1 Sep 25, 2008 (6:33 pm)
Replying to: bvdj84 (Sep 08, 2008 12:31 pm) I have only tried an 09 Malibu with a 6-speed auto. The Malibu is very quiet and the engine is quite isolated so I am not sure if it's worse than a Honda like some people have mentioned. I found it to be comparable and the transmission to be smooth.   Try them yourself back to back if you can. I don't think you will go wrong with either.
#492 of 643 Accord EX Vs Camry SE 2009 4 cylinder by ashwinkumar96 Oct 14, 2008 (7:11 am)
I am planning to purchase a new car and I am sort of confused either to choose camry or accord. Both have got the same features , price etc. I am looking at Accord EX Vs Camry SE. I have heard that seats in Accord are very uncomfortable, how far is it true? Is it very very uncomfortable. Also comapring the HP, its 155 for camry Vs 192 for Accord. I am planning to add in the package which includes moonroof etc in camry and inspite of that the price comes almost the same. Kindly help me in arriving at a decision. Replies to this message: lucky_777 (Oct 14, 2008 9:05 am)
#493 of 643 Re: Accord EX Vs Camry SE 2009 4 cylinder [ashwinkumar96] by lucky_777 Oct 14, 2008 (9:05 am)
Replying to: ashwinkumar96 (Oct 14, 2008 7:11 am) I'd say it is not entirely correct to say that Accord's seats very uncomfortable although it proved to be the case with my wife's 99 Accord. 09 Camry LE seats made a huge difference for her back. Everybody's body shape is different and what's comfortable for one person is a back killer for another. Worst part, that it is really hard to judge on seat comfort from the short test drive. If seat's comfort is very important for you then either arrange full day test drive with a dealer or rent same car and take it for a trip. From what I was reading I4 Camry with 155 HP is quicker then Accord 2008 LX (0-60). I don't believe that EX is much quicker then LX given that both have same basic torque and peak at same rpm (LX/EX, 1614300/1624400 ).
#494 of 643 Re: After 3 months of shopping.. [vanman1] by bibo2 Oct 14, 2008 (6:00 pm)
Replying to: vanman1 (Sep 25, 2008 6:28 pm) I totally agree. I was looking for buying Camry or Accord but ended up buying Malibu 08 2LT. The drive is so comfortable and smooth. With acoustic windows and soundproofed body panels, the bu is almost mute on the drive! I like its exterior better than Camry and Accord. Transmission is very smooth. First time drove it, I had to keep watching the speedometer to avoid police tickets as you will not notice its acceleration. The exterior is Europe style and really stand out from the crowds! The interior is very nice and luxury with the suede leather. I bought it from carmax for 19,6K + TTL. Can beat this price for such many nice features. BTW, I have been owner of Camries, Accords for 13 years. But I am sold to Chevrolet on this Bu! Replies to this message: beach15 (Oct 15, 2008 6:49 pm) bvdj84 (Oct 16, 2008 7:34 am) vanman1 (Oct 21, 2008 5:27 pm) and 6 more...

Messages Page 50 of 65 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 65 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Chevrolet Malibu Chevrolet Malibu vs. Toyota Camry vs. Honda Accord