Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol
921 messages, Last post on Oct 07, 2009 at 10:53 AM
You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: kirstie_h (Jul 14, 2009 5:36 am) Your lucky, we, i.e. WA State has a 10% law. There is no pure gasoline for sale in Washington State. |
|
|
Replying to: galonga (Jun 13, 2009 4:05 am) What I keep hearing is that the reason we're using ethanol is to reduce our dependence on oil. I already KNOW it does nothing but reduce mileage performance by an amount that guarantees no reduction in our use of or need for oil. I've asked it before and I'll ask it again, what's the benefit of this nonsense? Green at ANY cost? (And it isn't even all that green) I have a solid year of experience with ethanol now and the only thing it's proved to me is that a lot of subsidy money has been wasted. But that's not a big change for the folks in DC is it? 
|
|
|
Replying to: pf_flyer (Jul 14, 2009 3:46 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: gagrice (Jul 14, 2009 4:52 pm) I am certainly pretty green by thinking and this boondoggle is about as bad as it gets from an environmental standpoint. It's corporate welfare. It has nothing to do with environmental concerns.
|
|
|
Replying to: fezo (Jul 14, 2009 6:03 pm)  The entire push seems to be part of this "green at ANY cost" attitude that's developed. Don't get me wrong, I'm NOT for wasting energy or pro-pollution, but the idea that we have to DO something immediately or we're all gonna die isn't the way to approach things. The "corporate welfare" is a political issue that I'm ignoring because it winds up distracting us from the point that the ONE thing ethanol is touted as doing, reducing dependence on oil, is the one thing I know for a fact it doesn't do. There's a lot of "bad science" out there that's accepted as general wisdom simply because it's repeated and parroted endlessly.
|
|
|
Replying to: pf_flyer (Jul 15, 2009 2:32 am) I believe the “ethanol equals green myth” is marketing that grew out of the fact that ethanol was the least of two evils that is used to replace MTBE in gasoline. (I think MTBE is correct). I assume the EPA and greenies were in favor of it only because MTBE was more harmful than ethanol and it sounded good at the time. I’m sure neither the EPA nor the greenies had any idea of the unintended consequences or the sheer volume of land, corn and resources required to meet these needs. Then you have the big AG’s and politicians promoting ethanol even farther and it has now grown closer to being an environmental disaster than the salvation it was intended to be.
|
|
|
Replying to: jkinzel (Jul 15, 2009 7:34 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: texases (Jul 15, 2009 7:38 am)
|
|
|
Wowie zowie... deformed watermelons as a source for ethanol. Just Eat It Food isn't fuel |
|
|
Replying to: pf_flyer (Jul 15, 2009 2:32 pm) Adding 10% ethanol = poorer mileage. Add in all the equipment (using energy) to produce that ethanol and the net effect could be we actually burn more dino fuel.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
