Sign In Join 



The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol

921 messages,  Last post on Oct 07, 2009 at 10:53 AM

You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels


Messages Page 89 of 93
1
...
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#872 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [setamericafree] by texases
Jul 11, 2009 (1:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: setamericafree (Jul 11, 2009 12:28 pm)

Why even bring up methanol? There is no consideration being given to methanol by anyone related to transportation. It is extremely reactive, and would be incompatible for our current liquid fuel infrastructure. A red herring.
#873 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [setamericafree] by jkinzel
Jul 12, 2009 (12:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: setamericafree (Jul 11, 2009 12:28 pm)

America imports 70% of it's oil.
 
It's 60% and our biggest imports come from Canada and Mexico.
http://www.quoteoil.com/oil-imports.html
 
If you truly want energy independence, why are you not promoting diesel and bio-diesel a fuel that has 40% more energy than gasoline?
 
My concerns are that your motivation is not solely based on energy independence.
 
In my opinion, FLEX Fuel is a sham and one of the reasons GM got in trouble. I will never buy a FF car.
#874 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [jkinzel] by galonga
Jul 12, 2009 (1:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: jkinzel (Jul 12, 2009 12:18 am)

"If you truly want energy independence, why are you not promoting diesel and bio-diesel a fuel that has 40% more energy than gasoline?"
 
Where did you EVER get this number from my friend? Diesel engines are not even EXPLOSION, but COMBUSTION engines, and that's because oil-based fuels do not even explode, so low is their energy content!
  
"In my opinion, FLEX Fuel is a sham and one of the reasons GM got in trouble. I will never buy a FF car."
 
It is so much a sham than an ENTIRE COUNTRY has MORE cars running on ethanol than gasoline (Brazil). And that's been going on for over 30 years! Hard to say anything to that huh?
#875 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [galonga] by gagrice
Jul 12, 2009 (5:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: galonga (Jul 12, 2009 1:14 am)

It is so much a sham than an ENTIRE COUNTRY has MORE cars running on ethanol than gasoline (Brazil). And that's been going on for over 30 years! Hard to say anything to that huh?
 
It looks to me from your misinformation you are drinking the Corn squeezin' rather than running it in your car. Better check your facts on Brazil. I have already posted the facts on the subject for you several times. You just refuse to see the truth. And yes diesel has a lot more BTUs of energy per gallon than Gasoline. And as my friend has posted the FFVs sold in the USA are a joke. I know as I have one. Of course in all of So CA there is only one station selling E85 for about a buck a gallon more than RUG. Kind of a novelty fuel for the totally uninformed wannabe enviro wacko crowd.
 
I have no problem with people in the midwest running ethanol in their vehicles. I don't like it forced onto the rest of the country with the loss in mileage that is well documented. !0% ethanol equals 10% loss of mileage. Add to that the huge subsidies and it becomes apparent to an educated individual that we are getting screwed as a payoff to the Congress people in the Midwest.
#876 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [galonga] by jkinzel
Jul 12, 2009 (1:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: galonga (Jul 12, 2009 1:14 am)

Where did you EVER get this number from my friend? Diesel engines are not even EXPLOSION, but COMBUSTION engines, and that's because oil-based fuels do not even explode, so low is their energy content!
 
?
#877 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [gagrice] by kipk
Jul 13, 2009 (3:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 12, 2009 5:30 am)

>"I don't like it forced onto the rest of the country with the loss in mileage that is well documented. !0% ethanol equals 10% loss of mileage."
 
Yep!
 
And amazing to me how the Ethanol crowd can't seem to understand that, with a 10% drop in mileage, we are forced to buy 10% more fuel to go the same distance.
 
So we are burning the same amount of Dino PLUS the Ethanol.
 
Does 11 gallons of 10% Ethanol produce less emissions than 10 gallons of pure Dino ?
 
Kip
#878 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [kipk] by pf_flyer HOST
Jul 13, 2009 (3:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Jul 13, 2009 3:02 am)

Does 11 gallons of 10% Ethanol produce less emissions than 10 gallons of pure Dino ?
 
See? Now THAT is an interesting question that we'll probably never get a straight answer to because an ethanol proponent's answer would likely be, "You can't compare emissions from different amounts of fuel". But I'm like you. I understand that I'm not burning any less gasoline or doing anything to decrease demand on gasoline production because ethanol has been added to the mix.
#879 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [pf_flyer] by kipk
Jul 13, 2009 (3:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (Jul 13, 2009 3:08 am)

Seems to me that even if Ethanol required absolutely ZERO energy and emissions to produce, we would still be polluting more with the 10% increase in fuel volume to go the same distance.
 
Add in the emissions to produce the stuff and we are paying more to pollute more. Somewhat of a Loose-Loose situation for the masses and a Win-Win for the corn producers.
 
Kip
#880 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [kipk] by morin2
Jul 13, 2009 (3:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Jul 13, 2009 3:29 am)

Even if we assume that the emissions are the same, that ignores the problem of the pollution that results from the production of the corn. Where corn is replacing soybeans, the increased nitrogen runoff is polluting the water that receive it. Here in the Chesapeake Bay region, the state and fed govts are spending millions to attempt to remove a tiny fraction of the pollution from nitrogen runoff. A classic case of unintended consequences that should be taught in every environmental biology class in the country.
#881 of 921
Re: American Ingenuity beats a disaster! Keep America moving! [morin2] by pafromfl
Jul 13, 2009 (7:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morin2 (Jul 13, 2009 3:30 pm)

In addition, the corn-derived ethanol depletes the Midwest aquifer and drives up the worldwide price of food. If ethanol actually reduced oil consumption, some of the side effects might be tolerable. However E10 actually increases net oil consumption. Word is spreading. The Greenies should quickly admit E10 was a mistake or they will lose all credibility with the public.

Messages Page 89 of 93
1
...
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement