Sign In Join 



The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol

921 messages,  Last post on Oct 07, 2009 at 10:53 AM

You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels


Messages Page 56 of 93
1
...
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
...
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#546 of 921
Actually it's by duke23
Jun 14, 2008 (5:53 pm)
Reply
A 51 cent tax credit per gallon not .45 paid directly by the good ol taxpayer in addition to the tariff on Brazilian ethanol and it's still not an economically viable substitute.
 
"It may sound green, Patzek says, but that's because many scientists are not looking at the whole picture. According to his research, more fossil energy is used to produce ethanol than the energy contained within it.
 
Patzek's ethanol critique began during a freshman seminar he taught in which he and his students calculated the energy balance of the biofuel. Taking into account the energy required to grow the corn and convert it into ethanol, they determined that burning the biofuel as a gasoline additive actually results in a net energy loss of 65 percent. Later, Patzek says he realized the loss is much more than that even. "
 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050329132436.htm
 
Drop the tariff immediately, it's poor economics and costing the consumer. Better yet, drop the tariff and the .51/gal tax credit and let the market mandate the solution while giving the government one less bill to pay. With 10% of all tax revenues going to simply paying the interest on our 9 trillion dollar national debt. We can't afford no stinkin' subsidies.
#547 of 921
A little math by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (7:38 pm)
Reply
Oh the Mexicans are starving! Oh the Americans cant afford food! All because of ethanol. Here is the math. There is 56 lbs of corn in a bushel and lets say corn is $5.60 per bushel. Thats $0.10 per lb. If a box of cereal is 1 lb and the main ingredient is corn (lets say 60%) then there is only $0.06 of corn in a box. So what if corn $7+. Then there is $0.065 of corn in a box of cereal. Yep everyone is starving and cant afford food. Subway has $5 footlongs and McD's has an dollar menu but we cant afford to eat.
#548 of 921
Re: Actually it's [duke23] by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (7:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: duke23 (Jun 14, 2008 5:53 pm)

Look the $0.51/gal goes where? What? Did you say it goes to the gasoline refiners? Not the ethanol producers! This is blasphemy. Those refiners shouldn't be getting the credit, the ethanol producers should. Lets fix this. What the credit goes away in a couple of years. Cant be!
#549 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [gagrice] by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (7:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 14, 2008 11:16 am)

Well you have a choice of 2 oxygenates to reduce emissions. Its MTBE or Ethanol. Wait a minute, MTBE is a carcinigen and has been found in California ground water. If ethanol was used then it would have just decomposed. Why are there hardly any stations in CA with E85? I dont know. There are 5 ethanol plants in CA. I believe Pacific Ethanol has 5 of them.
 
If you lose 2 mpg I dont know what to say. I only lose 20% with E85 in an F150. My buddy has a GM and only loses 20% also. Maybe you should check with the dealer for calibration updates.
#550 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [tfb27] by texases
Jun 14, 2008 (7:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tfb27 (Jun 14, 2008 7:50 pm)

"Well you have a choice of 2 oxygenates to reduce emissions."
 
Thanks for pointing out another government screw-up - mandating oxygenate content because of the very slight, and debateable, pollution impact. A recent study by Stanford, I think, found that overall, emissions are higher with E10. So first we poison some groundwater with MTBE, then wast billions and drive up food prices with ethanol, all for naught.
#551 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [texases] by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (7:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: texases (Jun 14, 2008 1:43 pm)

Soon there will be E85 across the country. Then you can use. Did you know the state of CA has a fleet of Ford Escape Hybrids that are designed for E85 use only for them to study. Then you dont need reg gas. Just like when the country switched to no lead gas. We did it before.
#552 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [texases] by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (8:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: texases (Jun 14, 2008 7:54 pm)

I know you. A complaint for everything and a solution for nothing. Nag. Nag. Nag. You must be a an older guy. What do you think should be done? Everyone is bitchin here and I havent seen any potential fixes.
#553 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [avalon02wh] by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (8:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: avalon02wh (Jun 14, 2008 7:43 am)

How does ethanol help diesel? First the more gas we displace wth ethanol then the more refining capacity is open for diesel. Gas and diesel are made by the same refining plant. The reason its so expensive is that diesel is in high demand and there is only limited refining capacity in the US. Diesel is actually cheaper to make than gasoline. The Europeans cant understand why it more expensive in America only.
 
Here is the problem with diesel. The cost of the engine is still higher than a gas version and the emissions requirements make the after treatment of the exhaust even more expensive. This doesnt happen in FFV's
#554 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [tfb27] by texases
Jun 14, 2008 (8:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tfb27 (Jun 14, 2008 8:00 pm)

I am someone concerned that we are squandering money and food to line the pockets of agribusiness. A bad idea is a bad idea, even if it makes a small group of people very wealthy. A good friend is a chemical engineer that works for a company that designs ethanol plants, and he is constantly amazed that we're wasting our money on this. If turning corn inefficiently into ethanol is a bad idea, doing more of it solves nothing. The only current method to make ethanol that makes any sense is from sugar, and we're taxing imports to limit that. Even with cane-based ethanol, there are major impacts to the Amazon Basin in Brazil. My solutions? Put E85 mandates (and the whole biofuels movement) on hold until new technology (cellulosic or algae, maybe) is shown to actually make sense, and not result in major ecologic and economic damage, as the current programs do.
#555 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [texases] by tfb27
Jun 14, 2008 (8:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: texases (Jun 14, 2008 8:12 pm)

Field corn used in ethanol cant be eaten by people. So it is not a food source. Second corn based ethanol can happen now and it gets the ball rolling in this country for other things like cellulosic. Having fuel isnt enough. Getting the ball rolling means updating the infrastructure and producing vehicles to run it. These thoings need to be done before cellulosic comes online or the producers cant make money at it if it cant be distributed or consumed. Thats why we are starting with corn based ethanol. Besides, only the corn kernel is used for fuel. The cob and stalk are put back into the field. When cellulosic techs are developed these parts can be utilized to produce fuel. With no more acres consumed or people going hungry.
 
Do you have #'s on how good sugar cane ethanol is compared to corn?
 
The real solution is for consumption to reduce by 80%. Maybe a plague or nuclear war will make that happen. I cant think of another way. So we therefore need to produce more fuel in the world.

Messages Page 56 of 93
1
...
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
...
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement