Sign In Join 



The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol

921 messages,  Last post on Oct 07, 2009 at 10:53 AM

You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels


Messages Page 54 of 93
1
...
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
...
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#522 of 921
Re: $1.34/Gallon for Ethanol [bpizzuti] by jkinzel
Jun 03, 2008 (6:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (Jun 03, 2008 5:29 am)

Remember Congress is looking at lowering subsidies for corn ethanol.
Well that should only take another 5 to 10 years to pass. Remember that when you are talking about Government and time you have to think in geological speeds.
#523 of 921
Re: $1.34/Gallon for Ethanol [jkinzel] by fezo
Jun 03, 2008 (9:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: jkinzel (Jun 03, 2008 6:25 am)

True enough. Heck, they didn't technically end WWII with all the paperwork and such until 1952!
#524 of 921
Corn going for $7.25 a bushel by avalon02wh
Jun 12, 2008 (6:23 pm)
Reply
One bushel of corn can make 2.7 gallons of ethanol. That works out to a cost of $2.68 per gallon of ethanol just for the corn feedstock. At those prices the ethanol plants are going to need to charge $4 a gallon just to break even. And since ethanol will only get you 70% as far, the adjusted price for E85 could be over $5 a gallon.
#525 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [avalon02wh] by gagrice
Jun 12, 2008 (8:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: avalon02wh (Jun 12, 2008 6:23 pm)

There are ethanol plants going broke because corn is so high. I personally think Ethanol is responsible for the current high price of gas. It is responsible for the high price of corn for sure. Congress has created a HUGE mess with their ethanol mandate.
 
AAA says that E85 adjusted for mileage is about 36 cents per gallon more expensive than Regular unleaded Nation wide.
 
http://www.fuelgaugereport.com/
#526 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [avalon02wh] by jkinzel
Jun 12, 2008 (8:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: avalon02wh (Jun 12, 2008 6:23 pm)

With all the flooding in the mid-west I wonder if there will be enough corn planted to cover the mandate let alone provide food just for the US.
 
There is a lot of land under water that will take weeks if not months to dry to the point that any crops can be planted.
#527 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [jkinzel] by gagrice
Jun 12, 2008 (8:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jkinzel (Jun 12, 2008 8:11 pm)

They got a mess back there. Of course it is all caused by GW or was that AG?
 
#528 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [gagrice] by tfb27
Jun 13, 2008 (3:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 12, 2008 8:05 pm)

Ethanol is keeping gas prices and food prices lower. It is the global boom that is driving up the price of oil and food.
#529 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [avalon02wh] by tfb27
Jun 13, 2008 (3:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: avalon02wh (Jun 12, 2008 6:23 pm)

Start doing some research . In 1 bushel of corn you get 2.8 gals of ethanol and 18 lbs of high protein distillers grains used to feed animals like cattle and chickens. And E85 gets you about 80% of the mileage. This is only because engines are not optimized to run on ethanol. There is a ton of potential with the power of E85
#530 of 921
Re: Corn going for $7.25 a bushel [tfb27] by gagrice
Jun 13, 2008 (3:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tfb27 (Jun 13, 2008 3:27 pm)

Welcome to the forum.
 
And how do you think that ethanol, that has done nothing to cut importation of foreign oil, is helping reduce food and gas prices? Don't you find it odd that as soon as the ethanol mandate was passed by Congress that gas prices started going up along with oil prices? Or the price of corn has risen dramatically since the mandate. That Wheat and Soy crops were not planted to make room for the boom in corn? Or was that just all coincidence?
 
If you are one of the beneficiaries of the ethanol boondoggle, I fully understand your position. If you are just wanting an alternative no matter what the cost in human suffering I do not understand.
 
I will not argue that ethanol is not a viable alternative fuel. It is the use of food for bio fuels I find ridiculous. If it was just about ethanol, we would remove the tariff from Brazilian ethanol and get them to produce it with sugar cane. That makes more sense.
#531 of 921
More inconvenient facts about Ethanol by gagrice
Jun 13, 2008 (3:48 pm)
Reply
Well now I have to worry about my beef fed with the ethanol by-product "Distillers Grain"
 
Distillers' Grain In Cattle Feed May Contribute To E. Coli Infection
 
ScienceDaily (Jan. 22, 2008) — A new study suggests that the addition of dried distillers’ grain, an ethanol by-product, to cattle feed may contribute to the prevalence of E. coli O157 infection in cattle. The researchers from Kansas State University, Manhattan report their findings in the January 2008 issue of the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
 
Escherichia coli O157 is a significant food-borne pathogen of which cattle are major reservoirs. Colonization by E. coli O157 in cattle occurs in the gut and is shed in the feces. Diet is considered to be one of the factors influencing the prevalence and shedding of E. coli O157, emphasizing the need to examine dietary components and their impact on the physiological environment of the gut and the survival of E. coli O157.
 
Distillers’ grain is the coproduct that remains following the distillation of ethanol. It may be dehydrated to produce dried distillers’ grain (DDG) which is then commonly used as livestock feed. In the study cattle were administered one of three diets including: no dried distillers’ grain, steam-flaked corn and 15% corn silage with 0 to 25% dried distillers’ grains, or steam-flaked corn with 5% corn silage and 25% dried distillers’ grains, after which fecal samples were collected and tested for E. coli O157. Results showed that cattle fed with 25% dried distillers’ grains and 5% or 15% silage had higher prevalence of E. coli O157 than cattle fed a diet without dried distillers’ grains.
 
“The results indicate that there is a positive association between dried distillers’ grain and E. coli O157 in cattle, and the findings should have important ramifications for food safety,” say the researchers.

 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080122102428.htm
 
In reality cattle should never be fed CORN. It is bad for them. Looks like the ethanol boondoggle is making it worse.

Messages Page 54 of 93
1
...
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
...
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement