Sign In Join 



The Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol

921 messages,  Last post on Oct 07, 2009 at 10:53 AM

You are in the Ethanol - E85 FlexFuel Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels


Messages Page 50 of 93
1
...
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
...
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#486 of 921
Re: Rethinking things? [pf_flyer] by jkinzel
May 08, 2008 (7:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (May 08, 2008 4:55 am)

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, one of the Senate's two working farmers and a longtime ethanol booster, said he finds it hard to believe that ethanol could be "clobbered the way it's being clobbered right now" over the issue of food costs. What does the cost of corn have to do with the price of wheat or rice, he is telling people.
 
This statement alone should be grounds for impeachment or dismissal. No one displaying this type of ignorance should be entrusted with a public position.
#487 of 921
Re: Rethinking things? [jkinzel] by bpizzuti
May 08, 2008 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: jkinzel (May 08, 2008 7:05 am)

. No one displaying this type of ignorance should be entrusted with a public position.
 
Wouldn't that leave us with a grand total of about 3 people in Washington?
#488 of 921
Re: Rethinking things? [jkinzel] by gagrice
May 08, 2008 (7:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: jkinzel (May 08, 2008 7:05 am)

Grassley is protecting his interest. Shows that this kind of pork is on both sides of the aisle. I would kick out the whole Congress and call for special elections in all 50 states.
#489 of 921
Re: Rethinking things? [bpizzuti] by jkinzel
May 08, 2008 (8:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: bpizzuti (May 08, 2008 7:11 am)

Wouldn't that leave us with a grand total of about 3 people in Washington?
 
I didn't think of that, but now that you have mentioned it, you might be a bit optimistic at 3.
 
And Gary, I agree, boot them all and start over.
 
I’m detecting a pattern here.
#490 of 921
Here we go again.... by fezo
May 10, 2008 (11:53 am)
Reply
Gas prices keep rising. So why are ethanol producers hurting?
 
Let's see.... government mandates the stuff, gives subsides to growers, puts tariffs on the imported stuff and subsidizes the end users and these people are losing money. Swell. I'd say pass the tequila but it's getting subsidized out of the market....
#491 of 921
How do you spell boondoggle again? by pf_flyer HOST
May 10, 2008 (3:21 pm)
Reply
Ask Dub Schwartz!
#492 of 921
Re: How do you spell boondoggle again? [pf_flyer] by gagrice
May 10, 2008 (5:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pf_flyer (May 10, 2008 3:21 pm)

Dub hit the old nail on the head. Now if Congress gets their head out of the ADM trough and cuts the subsidy to the producers and removes the tariff from Brazil we may get a legitimate ethanol supply that can live on its own. Also remove the mandate to ethanol laced gas that only cuts mileage and DOES NOTHING for the environment. For those in the Midwest that want to use E85 I say go for it.
#493 of 921
Re: Ethanol [tpe] by sirlena
May 11, 2008 (5:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: tpe (Apr 30, 2008 4:29 pm)

Yes, some vehicles can run on 100% ethanol. Yes, there is a need for modification, but for fuel delivery only. Kits like the one I got from Flex Fuel My Ride apply the additional amount of fuel to burn ethanol. The ECM can add only so much to the fuel trim, and after about 50% ethanol, you get lean codes. And as far as compatibility, this video showed what happened to a Tahoe that ran E85 for over 100,000 miles. They tore apart the engine and fuel system to inspect it. Tahoe Video Engine and fuel system clean. The comparable gas Tahoe needed a fuel pump, before 100,000 miles.
 
Yes, I think this is awesome, making fuel in your back-yard through a non-combustible process. Many of the articles fail to mention that the sugar source is from Mexico and non-edible. It's extremely cheap and that company is looking to provide a distribution network for the sugar. Also, there is a Discarded Alcohol Recovery mode, that reduces the price to 10 cents a gallon. EFuel100
 
Oh, and someone keeps mentioning the subsidies. That 51 cents/gallon credit goes mostly to OIL companies, because they didn't want to stop adding MTBE (cancer causing and ground water polluting) to the fuel as a oxygenate. The credit was to help build the infrastructure for the blending. We get some of that money back thru taxing non-US ethanol.
#494 of 921
Re: Ethanol [sirlena] by gagrice
May 11, 2008 (5:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: sirlena (May 11, 2008 5:27 am)

Oh, and someone keeps mentioning the subsidies. That 51 cents/gallon credit goes mostly to OIL companies, because they didn't want to stop adding MTBE (cancer causing and ground water polluting) to the fuel as a oxygenate. The credit was to help build the infrastructure for the blending. We get some of that money back thru taxing non-US ethanol
 
Yes the refinery gets the 51 cents per gallon subsidy for adding ethanol. Not to eliminate the MTBE. MTBE was also a government mandate that IS totally unnecessary. Even the EPA website has a good article on the fact that oxygenated fuel is no longer needed. So the fact that ethanol is an oxygenate in small percentages is a waste. The Mandate to lace our unleaded gas with ethanol is corporate welfare to companies like Exxon, ADM and VERASUN. It saves America NOTHING. My mileage drops more than 10% with whatever ethanol they add to our gas in CA. So absolutely no help on cutting imported oil.
 
You may be convinced that corn ethanol is a good alternative fuel. I don't think you have swayed many others in that direction. Now that several ethanol stills are going broke due to high corn prices what say ye? That is exactly what happened to the Brazilian ethanol industry in the 1980s. Sugar was more valuable as food.
 
No one gets that 53 cent tariff on Brazilian ethanol. It is just added to the price of our ethanol laced gas. Even with the 53 cent tariff Brazil can produce ethanol cheaper than our farmers can with highly subsidized corn. That to me shows the folly in calling it an alternative. It is merely a scam perpetrated on the American public.
 
By the logic exhibited with corn ethanol legislation we should be adding a 25% tariff on cars coming from Japan, Korea and Germany, while giving a 25% subsidy to the Big 3 manufacturers in the USA.

Messages Page 50 of 93
1
...
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
...
93
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement