Sign In Join 



Dodge Dakota Performance and Towing Mods

46 messages,  Last post on Jul 03, 2009 at 9:36 AM

You are in the Dodge Dakota Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Dodge Dakota, Truck


Messages Page 4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#30 of 46
Re: Apples to Apples [steak2k1] by dustyk
May 07, 2007 (5:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steak2k1 (May 07, 2007 6:08 am)

Do you know what axle ratio your Dak had?
 
Dusty
#31 of 46
Re: Apples to Apples [bpeebles] by dustyk
May 07, 2007 (6:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bpeebles (May 07, 2007 4:51 pm)

Yeah, I'm with Bruce on this. Despite the often repeated myth that the 4.7 is "terrible" on gas, I've gotten:
 
*over 17 MPG on 133 tanks of gas out of 293
 
*over 18 MPG on 78 tanks out of 293.
 
*over 19 MPG on 17 tanks out of 293
 
*over 20 MPG on 7 tanks out of 293
 
*over 21 MPG on 4 tanks out of 293
 
*over 22 MPG on 1 tank out of 293
 
*over 23 MPG on 1 tank out of 293
 
*over 24 MPG on 1 tank out of 293
 
There is (was) thought of a Dakota diesel for the 2008, and the 4.7 gets full hemispherical heads and a sixty HP increase next year.
 
Regards,
Dusty
#32 of 46
Re: Apples to Apples [dustyk] by sunburn
May 08, 2007 (4:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dustyk (May 07, 2007 6:13 pm)

Dusty,
 
That's an interesting distribution on your gas mileage. Very one sided. Come to think about it, mine's probably similar, just about 4-5 MPG less. But, my QC is a 4x4 with 3.92 gears.
 
The one thing I've noticed with the newer Dakotas is the mileage ratings are much higher than mine. My 02, 4.7, auto, 4x4 was rated at 13/18. An 07, 4.7, auto, 4x4 I recently saw was rated at 15/20. I know the newer Daks have a 5 sp automatic, versus my 4 sp. But when that was introduced, the highway mileage only went up by 1 MPG. I wonder what else they changed to get the better mileage?
#33 of 46
Re: Apples to Apples [steak2k1] by sunburn
May 08, 2007 (4:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steak2k1 (May 07, 2007 6:08 am)

I recently read where the SAE is coming up with a set of standardized test to determine tow ratings. This will hopefully level the "tow ratings" playing field.
#34 of 46
Torque converter lockup, towing, etc. by bowdin
May 17, 2007 (6:29 am)
Reply
Most people here seem to agree with DC: tow with overdrive off in hilly conditions. Some people have warned about overheating the torque converter if you tow in overdrive.
 
But what about the lockup system? If I run at ~70mph, I'm spinning about 2500rpm (2002 Quad Cab, 4.7L, 3.92 rear end). Give it a little gas, it spins up to about 3100rpm, I assume this is the torque converter unlocking?? Give it more gas, it shifts into 3rd (3500rpm to maintain about 70mph).
 
So is the danger of towing in overdrive that it unlocks and locks too much? If it stays locked is it bad to tow in overdrive? Thanks for any input.
 
-Eric
#35 of 46
Re: Torque converter lockup, towing, etc. [bowdin] by sunburn
May 17, 2007 (5:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bowdin (May 17, 2007 6:29 am)

Yes, the locking and unlocking of the torque converter is one cause of transmission overheating. But, you have to be careful when towing in OD. I used to do it when towing a 2500 lb pop-up camper. I did have any problems, except when my speed dropped under 50 MPH.
 
Now that I've moved up to a 4500 lb travel trailer, towing in OD is out of the question. The reason is the load is great enough, the transmission won't shift into OD, except when going down hill. When the OD is on, the torque converter will not lock up in 3rd gear, hence a lot of heat is generated due to the torque converter slippage. When the OD is off, the torque converter will lock up in both 2nd and 3rd gears.
 
It just depends on how much you are towing.
#36 of 46
Re: Torque converter lockup, towing, etc. [sunburn] by bowdin
May 18, 2007 (3:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: sunburn (May 17, 2007 5:08 pm)

Thanks for the reply. I'm towing 4200lbs. Overall the 4.7L, 3.92 rear does fine, and in overdrive it will shift into 4th and even drop down to 2500 rpm at 70mph in many situations (even a slight upward grade). Is this hard on the torque converter or tranny? Obviously I'm not totally versed on torque converter lockup and what the issues are.
 
The manual says "overdrive off in hilly conditions." But the definition of hilly depends on whether you live in Kansas or Colorado. So (in marginal situations) is there a transmission behavior to look for to indicate when to turn overdrive off?
-Eric
#37 of 46
Re: Torque converter lockup, towing, etc. [bowdin] by sunburn
May 18, 2007 (3:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bowdin (May 18, 2007 3:35 am)

Considering that the later model 545RFE transmissions (the 5 speed version of the 4-speed 45RFE. The two transmissions are mechanically identical) just have a "tow/haul" mode, you can't lock out the OD, so it would seem to be okay to tow in OD as long the transmission isn't shifting excessively or the torque converter is unlocking and locking excessively. Manufacturers tend to be either vague or very restrictive (i.e. "don't") when it comes to towing in OD.
#38 of 46
Re: Torque converter lockup, towing, etc. [sunburn] by bpeebles
May 18, 2007 (5:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sunburn (May 18, 2007 3:14 pm)

When I purchased my Dak, I orderd the manual xmission from the factory. I never have any issues with the torque converter - LOL
 
Besides, ordering direct from the factory is CHEAPER than purchasing off the dealers lot and I got the options I wanted. This is because the dealer has a GUARANTEED sell when you order from the factory. The dealer's purchaser purposefully orders cars for the lot which have options with the highest markup. This be because they still have to SELL the vehicle. (And brush the snow off of it all winter!)
#39 of 46
Re: Apples to Apples [sunburn] by dustyk
Jul 07, 2007 (1:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sunburn (May 08, 2007 4:36 pm)

Sunburn,
 
The first one or two years of the 4.7 in a Dakota they used a 47 or 48mm throttlebody. In 2002 or 2003 that was increased to a 50mm.
 
The camshafts are different for each year up to 2003. The 2003/2004 camshaft duration was changed to 243.5 degrees intake, 253.7 exhaust. I think that fuel delivery and timing algorithm changes permitted a decrease to valve overlap (17 degrees) for an increase in low end torque and improved idle. Likewise since '04 they've changed camshaft profile and fuel delivery some more.
 
The mere fact that the 545RFE transmission has five normal forward gear ratios and considerably less parasitic losses than the previous "RE" series transmissions could explain part of that 1 MPG difference. Top gear ratio for the 46RE is .69, and .67 for the 545RFE. Pretty close but a slight advantage for Dodge's newer automatic. The intermediate second gear on the 545RFE might actually contribute more to better gas mileage.
 
Starting in 2007, Chrysler is phasing in Variable Line Pressure (VLP) to its automatic transmissions. This will significantly reduce parasitic losses. In think the RFE will get VLP in 2008.
 
On my son's last leave I rented him an '05 Dakota Quad Cab, 4x4. It had the same axle ratio as yours. He was able to average 16.6 for the two weeks he had it in very mixed driving.
 
Best regards,
Dusty

Messages Page 4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement