You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Cadillac DTS
Cadillac DTS/STS vs. Chrysler 300/300C

75 messages, Last post on Mar 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM
You are in the Cadillac DTS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Oct 06, 2006 6:20 am) |
|
|
Replying to: bremertong (Oct 06, 2006 7:32 pm) I do understand that you have an interest in the 300C, but my point here is that the 300C's interior is not really in the luxury car class. The Cadillac's interior is much nicer I think, if short of true luxury. I think that this forum has run its course, with only a few Chrysler owners responding. I do think that the 300 is a much better car than the RWD Ford/Lincoln/Mercury cars, mainly because of the 300's suspension design. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Oct 07, 2006 12:40 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Oct 07, 2006 12:40 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: bremertong (Oct 08, 2006 8:16 pm) Handling has to do with how the car responds to turns in the road and bumps. Mountain highways are a good test of how a car will respond. The Town Car or DeVille is not going to respond like a sports car. As far interior noise goes, tire designs make a big difference in sound. However, the Town Car may have more or better sound insulation than Cadillac. I would guess that the Chrysler 300 will have less sound insulation. |
|
|
Just for a change.... This forum is interesting though I do find the comparison to be, well, strange. The two cars have really different personalities. I own a 300C. The exterior, to me, has a much more cohesive look than the DTS, and it's at least as luxurious looking as a DTS, though it does have a more aggressive design. The 300C dash is sweet, and the seats are comfortable and good looking. I don't miss the absence of wood. The console and door panels, however, don't match the lux look of the dash and it's there where it pales compared to the DTS. But the real difference is in the ride. The 300C borders on harsh (and the crummy Conti tires don't help). Anyone use to a Caddy ride won't like the Chrysler. Having said that, I don't think I'd want a softly sprung vehicle with the brute force of the Hemi. But Chrysler could have compromised a bit here. The electronic stability control is intrusive enough that a bit more "soft" could have been safely added. And as long as we're talking about tweaking the suspension, Chrysler could also stand to do something with the sensitivity of the front end: Very road-crown sensitive; very reactive to road imperfections--leading to steering overcorrection. Doesn't take much to end up fighting the car. After 2 years of driving, I still think I made the right choice for me. The design has not grown old in my eyes, nor have I tired of the power. Overall gas mileage has been 20 mpg, with a recent 750 mile trip, which included 100 miles of local driving, giving me 25 mpg. It's stayed rattle free and generally trouble free...so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: vic10 (Oct 09, 2006 12:55 pm) |
|
|
|
|
|
| I decided to buy a Lincoln Town Car a an equal second car to my Cadillac DTS. Am pleased with both cars, DTS a bit more power, more advanced hi tech, higher quality exterior paint. Town Car more quiet on the road, interior more to my liking, rear wheel drive which I find desirable. I wondered if there are any folks that post here that own both a DTS and 300C and how you would describe your experiences with the DTS compared with the 300C? | |
|
Replying to: sls002 (Oct 07, 2006 12:40 pm) The performance Cadillac should be compared to the 300C SRT, not the 300C. I bought my C for $35,000 well equipped (everything except navigation). I am well pleased after 2 years of ownership.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Cadillac DTS
Cadillac DTS/STS vs. Chrysler 300/300C
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac DTS
2011 Chrysler 300
2010 Cadillac STS



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats