Dodge Charger 2006+

1087 messages,  Last post on Sep 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM

You are in the Dodge Charger Forum.

What is this discussion about? Dodge Charger, Dodge Charger SRT-8, Sedan

#592 of 1087 Re: Mustang vs. Charger [batista] by frnkrzzo

Aug 08, 2005 (11:38 am)

Replying to: batista (Aug 07, 2005 10:11 am)
i did a little more research to dispute your rediculous argument. last months car and driver results....
 
350 hp charger (dont know where youre getting the 400 from unless your talking about the upcomming srt)
 
35500 price as tested.
 
14.2 sec 1/4 mile. thats a full 1/2 second slower than the most conservative results on the mustang.
 
5.6 second 0-60. .2 slower than a mustang
 
car and driver also did indeed confirm that this dodge is ugly.
 
i know you're about to write something stoopid like "ya, but the srt 8 will be faster than a mustang gt. of course, i hope it would be being at least 15000 more expensive. then again, theres always the matter of the shelby mustang. in any case, make sure you pay for yours in cash so when we race for pink slips a la the dukes of hazzard, i wont end up oweing chrysler financial money on one of their rediculous finance schemes.
 
the new 2006 dodge charger.....theres no cure for ugly.

#593 of 1087 Re: Mustang vs. Charger [frnkrzzo] by qbrozen

Aug 08, 2005 (12:48 pm)

Replying to: frnkrzzo (Aug 08, 2005 11:38 am)
car and driver also did indeed confirm that this dodge is ugly.
 
Do you really need someone else to tell you what looks good?

#594 of 1087 Re: Mustang vs. Charger [qbrozen] by shipo

Aug 08, 2005 (12:53 pm)

Replying to: qbrozen (Aug 08, 2005 12:48 pm)
I'm thinking that we should stop feeding the troll.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo

#595 of 1087 Re: Mustang vs. Charger [qbrozen] by frnkrzzo

Aug 08, 2005 (12:56 pm)

Replying to: qbrozen (Aug 08, 2005 12:48 pm)
hey man, i had to quote car and driver to dispell the idea that the charger was as fast as the mustang because you wouldnt take my word for it. i figured id quote them on the ugly thing too in case you didnt believe me. any more counterpoints or are you guys just going to kneel in respect of a true american performance car legend?

#596 of 1087 Re: Mustang vs. Charger [frnkrzzo] by qbrozen

Aug 08, 2005 (12:58 pm)

Replying to: frnkrzzo (Aug 08, 2005 12:56 pm)
i said nothing about the Charger, so don't go spouting at me.
 
personally, I feel having to resort to calling another car ugly is a sad way to present an argument. The Mustang's performance can stand on its own ... 'nuff said.

#597 of 1087 Re: Mustang vs. Charger [shipo] by frnkrzzo

Aug 08, 2005 (12:59 pm)

Replying to: shipo (Aug 08, 2005 12:53 pm)
finally. a submission post. now i'll leave the dodge guys to discuss their new hemis vs. the trusty 318 equipped 5th avenue or some damn thing. happy motoring.

#599 of 1087 Shipo has the best idea by pat

Aug 09, 2005 (12:43 pm)

Folks, chill out please, and get back to the Charger. The personal comments need to stop.

#600 of 1087 Re: Shipo has the best idea [pat] by knightmare65

Aug 09, 2005 (2:07 pm)

Replying to: pat (Aug 09, 2005 12:43 pm)
OK, I think that the 2006 Charger is the sharpest looking car out there, especially the Magnesium Pearlcoat color. I've had mine since late May and it still looks very intimidating.

#601 of 1087 Mustang vs Charger by hayneldan

Aug 09, 2005 (8:14 pm)

Comparing the Mustang GT V8 to the Charger R/T V8.The only places the Mustang scores better is 0-60. 5.2 vs 5.6 and fuel economy 17-18 mpg vs 17mpg.
Interior volume Charger, 105 cu ft, Mustang, 83 cu ft. luggage space, Charger 16 cu ft. Mustang, 13 cu ft. Oh by the way owners rated the Charger 9.5 out of 10, where Mustang OWNERS rated the Mustang 5.9 out of 10. Out of 10 categories Charger did better in all 10 vs the Mustang. Restating this was the OWNERS doing the rating. caranddriver.com is the source.
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement