You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Dodge Charger
Dodge Charger 2006+

1087 messages, Last post on Sep 28, 2008 at 10:38 PM
You are in the Dodge Charger Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Dodge Charger SRT-8 TV commercial that touted the 425HP HEMI engine but then popped the hood to show a "cross", East-to-West, mounted V8 engine. To me East-to-West meant FWD and I could not reconcile 425HP at the front wheels. Research indicated the Charger SRT-8 engine is actually North-to-South and RWD just as it should be. So, did I really see what I remember seeing? Somebody screwed up?
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (May 14, 2007 9:05 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: xtec (May 14, 2007 3:07 pm) I did not say, conclude, that North-South would ALWAYS mean RWD, only that East-West always meant FWD...
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (May 14, 2007 3:56 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: xtec (May 14, 2007 8:56 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: wwest (May 14, 2007 9:05 am) "Research indicated the charger SRT-8 engine is actually North-to-South and RWD just as it should be." It was to my intent to indicate that North/South engine mounting meant RWD "just as it should be". I was trying to say that with 425HP it was RWD just as it should be. Also, I take the position that FWD or front biased AWD can be so hazardous in wintertime conditions that they should be outlawed.
|
|
|
Replying to: wwest (May 15, 2007 7:38 am) |
|
|
that may seem stupid, so please bear with the ignorant... Is the Charger basically a Chrysler 300 but not as fancy, or are they really different underneath???...i.e.chassis, etc. Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
Marsha, the 300 (at least 2006 and beyond) and Charger ARE built on the same Chassis (which is a Mercedes chassis) and also have same engine options... I think the Charger looks more "Sporty", while the 300 looks more "Classy"... |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Dodge Charger
Dodge Charger 2006+
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Dodge Charger



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats