Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid - READ ONLY

163 messages,  Last post on Dec 04, 2008 at 4:53 AM

You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid, Hybrid Cars, Sedan


Messages Page 9 of 17
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
17
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#75 of 163
Re: What is the point? [aspesisteve] by nosirrahg
Jan 20, 2008 (8:39 pm)

Replying to: aspesisteve (Jan 20, 2008 4:25 pm)

I tend to agree with you, but I think the Volt could be a game changer (assuming it arrives on time, and delivers on GMs promises).
 
I wonder if due to the new CAFE standards if GM is trying to put a little hybrid into everything they do? Even if each only increases mileage marginally, a small gain across the board is probably more beneficial to their bottom-line than having a bunch of gas guzzlers and one knock-out hybrid.
#76 of 163
Re: What is the point? [nosirrahg] by scortch
Jan 21, 2008 (10:15 am)

Replying to: nosirrahg (Jan 20, 2008 8:39 pm)

The Volt will more than likely be out of reach of most people, if it ever arrives. It'll be another 5-10 years at this rate.
 
Thing is, if GM is going to spend all that R&D money on bringing a hybrid into existence for GM vehicles, why not do it right instead of the crap they came up with? If they really wanted to be green, it would be a lot better than the junk they have.
 
It would be MUCH more beneficial to their bottom line if they did it right to begin with.
 
The government should require hybrids to get xx more mileage than the equivalent gas only version of a vehicle, before they give any kind of credits or be recognized at all. Maybe we need a new category other than hybrid, since GM has proven that just because it is a hybrid, doesn't mean it's green or better.
 
The Malibu hybrid should be getting 34 or so city mileage at least. Even the Prius is finding it hard to justify the cost of ownership in some cases. The Malibu hybrid would no near be able to justify it's cost of ownership. It puts more of a burden on the consumer instead of helping them.
 
It's just like E85, just because it uses a different fuel, doesn't make it better. E85 as it is currently isn't that green at all once you look at the big picture of corn based ethanol.
 
Trying to pull one over on the public and saying you are green doesn't make you green.
#77 of 163
Beyond expectations (Toyota Hybrids) by mickeyrom
Jan 21, 2008 (11:02 am)
What amazes me is how dependable and trouble free the Toyota Hybrid system has been when you consider it's complexity. We have some friends with an older Prius with over 100 K miles and they havent had a single problem. CR predicts reliability above average...excellent. This applies to the Japanese made cars as well as the Ford Escape which uses the same system.
 
Why cant GM come up with a similar system? The 2MPG increase is a joke.
#78 of 163
Re: Beyond expectations (Toyota Hybrids) [mickeyrom] by scortch
Jan 21, 2008 (12:04 pm)

Replying to: mickeyrom (Jan 21, 2008 11:02 am)

That is if it really does get 2MPG more.
#79 of 163
TOYOTA HYBRIDS by golfnut5
Jan 22, 2008 (5:36 pm)
Toyota has set the benchmark for hybrids, let the battle begin. GM's attempt at hybrids is laughable, at this pace they will never catch Toyota. Ford's hybrid is actually Toyota's first generation hybrid system. Ford wanted to get in the game quickly and purchased their hybrid from Toyota and paid big $$.
#80 of 163
gm does not have a capable hybrid? by fshi
Jan 23, 2008 (8:14 am)
gm tahoe's two mode hybrid is more advanced than prius'. tahoe 21/22 rating is day and night better than sequoia's 14/19 rating. think it is low? it is the same as camry 4cylinder city. it can haul 8 people, 6000lbs, 6.0ltr v8. it is very EFFICIENT.
 
toyota make great small cars. look at prius and assume it is gas-only you would expect it get 30 city, (for its size, functionality, fit, versa all similar), with hybrid it has about 50% boost of fuel economy. Tahoe is the same if not more.
 
Tahoe's saving of fuel is much more than prius. It has bigger environmental impact than the tiny prius.
#81 of 163
Re: gm does not have a capable hybrid? [fshi] by mickeyrom
Jan 23, 2008 (9:16 am)

Replying to: fshi (Jan 23, 2008 8:14 am)

 The only three hybrids made by Toyota are the Highlander ,Prius and Camry. If I'm wrong,it must have just come out...like today.I do know that the Highlander Hybrid gets about 30MPG.,the Prius can pretty much guarantee 44MPG all around. The Ford Escape ,using Toyota's technology gets over 30 MPG,so the 22 that Tahoe gets is a joke.Still if it actually gets 21 MPG in the city,I would be very impressed.(and surprised)
PS if the GM system is really all that great...why is it that the AURA and the Chevy hybrids are rated no better than my conventional KIA Optima?
#82 of 163
Re: gm does not have a capable hybrid? [fshi] by aspesisteve
Jan 23, 2008 (9:24 am)

Replying to: fshi (Jan 23, 2008 8:14 am)

"Tahoe's saving of fuel is much more than prius. It has bigger environmental impact than the tiny prius".
 
now that's spin
 
Maybe they should allow the Tahoe to drive in the commuter lane?
LOL
#83 of 163
Re: gm does not have a capable hybrid? [fshi] by scortch
Jan 23, 2008 (11:03 am)

Replying to: fshi (Jan 23, 2008 8:14 am)

LOL, trying ot make GM look good by comparing the Tahoe and Sequoia. Classic
 
Prius, no GM equivalent
Camry hybrid, no GM equivalent (gas mileage wise)
Highlander hybrid, no GM equivalent
 
and you want to point out Tahoe? LOL
 
I like GM overall, my last 5 out of 7, including my current vehicle has been GM but, we must face reality here. They are trying to pull a fast one on people big time.
#84 of 163
Re: gm does not have a capable hybrid? [scortch] by fshi
Jan 24, 2008 (6:44 am)

Replying to: scortch (Jan 23, 2008 11:03 am)

in the full size suv/truck market, toyota does not have any hybrid offerings, when people brag about prius's milage, you have to consider that is a less capable vehicle than the full size suv. there are lot of customers in the full size vecicle segment, gm leads in that segment. period. toyota leads in the smaller vehicle segment. you do not drive larger vehicle does not mean it is nonexsist.

Messages Page 9 of 17
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
17
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement