You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles
Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid ![]()

163 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2008 at 4:53 AM
You are in the Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Hybrids Host for directions! discussion.
|
A hybrid car that only gets 32 mpg (max) is completely pointless - like so much else that comes from Detroit these days. We are probably going to be paying $5.00/gal within 2 years. Why would I buy Malibu when a Prius will best its mileage by 50% to 75% (if you are a typical urban freeway crawler). Pointless. I wouldn't even take a first look at a Malibu. |
|
|
Replying to: kingacres (Jan 12, 2008 1:44 am) I agree that 32MPG Hwy is nothing special...but I wonder how is the real world city mileage is...
|
|
|
Replying to: mickeyrom (Jan 12, 2008 7:51 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: scortch (Jan 12, 2008 10:23 am) |
|
|
Scortch, the market, the hundreds of millions of people in the world who might buy a new car of the 2008 model year, is fickle. The people who want to spend too much to get a full hybrid that delivers 50 mpg bought the Prius and never got their 50 mpg in regular use. They were consistently chagrined that the Corolla, not even pretending to be a hybrid, gets 40 mpg and establishes a darned solid baseline of comparison. Since the 2008 Malibu hybrid is a hybrid assist, doesn't do much, but does do something measurable, it needs to be a cheap option. It is . Back when the Prius was a new choice, I calculated that the payoff time for me was 10 years if the Prius delivered 50 mpg. At 45 or thereabouts mpg, the Prius battery pack can't last long enough for the Prius to ever break even in the Corolla comparison. The Malibu might not impress the eco-purists with it's technological whiz-banginess, but for the green eye shades crowd its a more realistic choice than a Prius. The Malibu hybrid assist actually can deliver tangible $ benefits if you keep it for a realistic number of years of $3 and $4 gasoline. As the market has developed, it's become obvious that other than a small part of the population which wants to pay too much for too little economic benefit, the market really wants cars that look good and go fast. The market is telling the manufacturers that some people will buy a hybrid if it looks better and goes faster than a Prius. For people who want a car that gets good gas mileage in 2008, there is the 40 mpg cheap Corolla or the even better choice of a 38 mpg cheaper Aveo. I have and remain convinced that GM, putting 2-stage hybrids in pickups and SUV's will sell better at 20 mpg than Toyota or Honda can at 45 mpg. The 20 mpg pickup is a 25% or 30% improvement. The 45 mpg subcompact is only an 12% improvement. |
|
|
It's still a huge waste of R&D, time and our money. It doesn't produce enough measurable results to be worth everything that went into making it and buying it. GM probably got some huge credit for doing it and that's the only reason. It's a worthless piece of junk that's trying to capitalize on people that see hybrid and don't know that GM is ripping them off with something that isn't worth a crap. You can get more measurable results by just driving a little differently or buying better fuel. GM is just trying to play people for fools and some will play along with them and buy into it. It's a scam, just like E85 is.
|
|
|
Replying to: scortch (Jan 13, 2008 7:36 pm) You can probably get more fuel savings just by walking to the store to get your groceries instead of driving. In addition you will get the health benefit. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: scortch (Jan 12, 2008 10:23 am) I went to the car show here in San Jose. Chevy probably spends more money promoting how "green" they are than they actually do on the technology. It's like Exon talking about how they "care" about alternative forms of energy. Mitt Romney says he's going to save Michigan? LOL
|
|
|
Replying to: aspesisteve (Jan 14, 2008 11:25 am) Btw, check the EPA ratings on the GM Tahoe/Yukon/Suburbans and then check the EPA rating on Toyota's new Sequoia and Land Cruiser. You might be surprised about which ones are more efficient. |
|
|
Replying to: nedzel (Jan 18, 2008 10:53 am) GM's E85 doesn't count as being green. In fact, it's not green at all when you look at the whole picture of corn based ethanol. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hybrid Vehicles
Hybrid Vehicles - Archived Discussions
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid ![]()
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats