Sign In Join 



Subaru Forester MPG-Real World Numbers

174 messages,  Last post on May 13, 2009 at 4:45 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Wagon


Messages Page 10 of 18
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#85 of 174
Mileage by dcwestby
Dec 04, 2007 (1:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pbai (Sep 08, 2007 12:29 am)

Generally I fill up around either 3/4s full or half tank... I generally drive about 25 miles each way to work and back, takes me about a 30 minute drive, 5-10 minuts getting to freeway then 15-20 min on freeway. So generally I'm filling up every 2-3 days.
 
I fill up at my place of work, where gas is about 3.11/gal [cheapest in the area as far as washington state people see it] I'm very sure its about 2 gallons a day I use.. Old car I'd use over 2 gallons a day..
 
I'd say about 25-30mpg avg
#86 of 174
2008 Forester X Prem by johnv STAFF
Feb 20, 2008 (3:05 pm)
Reply
First measured tank.
Odometer just rolled over 700. 5spd MT.
328 miles into the CA foothills: 0 -> 2000ft -> 1500ft -> 2000ft -> 0 twice + lots of 80mph freeway, some with sunroof open.
26.1 mpg
#87 of 174
Re: 2008 Forester X Prem [johnv] by ateixeira
Feb 22, 2008 (5:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: johnv (Feb 20, 2008 3:05 pm)

Sounds great - and it should get better because the engine is still very green.
#88 of 174
MPG on Recent Trip by leo2633
Jul 03, 2008 (4:10 am)
Reply
My wife and I just returned home to New Jersey from a 1300 mile round trip to North Carolina. We took my 5 speed 2001 Forester, which now has 176K miles. On the trip down, I got 30.6 MPG, which was great, considering all the stop and go traffic we encountered along I-95. Coming home, when traffic was much lighter, I got 34.5 MPG and 450 miles (exactly) on one tank, which took me from Belmont, NC to Annapolis, MD. That was the highest MPG and longest distance per tank I've ever gotten, and I've tracked MPG for every tankful since purchasing the car new 7 years ago. Upon refueling, I still had 2-point-something gallons left, which gave me a (theoretical) cruising range of over 500 miles. Not that I would ever take it that low, but it was interesting to see that.
 
Speeds were kept at 60-65 MPH for most of the trip, cruise control was used whenever possible and the A/C was on the entire time. Not too shabby for a car that was rated about 28 MPG on the highway when new.
 
Len
#89 of 174
Re: MPG on Recent Trip [leo2633] by ateixeira
Jul 03, 2008 (10:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: leo2633 (Jul 03, 2008 4:10 am)

176k miles and it's still able to get 30.6mpg? Wow!
#90 of 174
Re: First tank 21 MPG [pbai] by peteshaw
Jul 21, 2008 (6:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pbai (Jun 10, 2007 1:19 pm)

Our 2006 Subaru Forester with AT and no Turbo, gets exactly what the sticker said it would 23 town, 28 hwy. That is driving right on the speed limits, and driving sensibly. -- PeteShaw
#91 of 174
Low and High by ateixeira
Jul 30, 2008 (11:18 am)
Reply
21mpg low, 34 mpg high, so far.
 
Average is usually 22-26 or so, though the wife drives mostly around town and in traffic.
 
We use our minivan for long trips and highway miles.
#92 of 174
Re: First tank 21 MPG [peteshaw] by aatherton
Aug 01, 2008 (3:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: peteshaw (Jul 21, 2008 6:00 pm)

"Our 2006 Subaru Forester with AT and no Turbo, gets exactly what the sticker said it would 23 town, 28 hwy. That is driving right on the speed limits, and driving sensibly."
 
I think our cars are physically identical, yet the sticker on my 2008 Subaru Forester with AT and no Turbo says 20 town, 26 hwy.
 
Driving at the limits and using gentle accelerations, I am getting 26 around town (mixed suburb and city) and 28 on highway.
#93 of 174
Re: First tank 21 MPG [aatherton] by jim314
Aug 01, 2008 (5:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: aatherton (Aug 01, 2008 3:53 am)

The EPA did revise the formulas it uses to calculate the estimated mpg's from the dynamometer tests (which I think were not changed). I think 2008 was the first year of the new calculation procedure.
 
There could be a difference in the transmission between '06 and '08 (maybe just the software settings for control), or the engine con trol software.
 
Are the tires the same on the '06 and '08?
 
Then there is the possibility of variation in performance of identical cars.

Messages Page 10 of 18
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement