Sign In Join 



Subaru Forester MPG-Real World Numbers

174 messages,  Last post on May 13, 2009 at 4:45 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Wagon


Messages Page 16 of 18
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#151 of 174
09 Forester XT MPG by jrock56
Mar 19, 2009 (10:31 am)
Reply
I am considering purchasing an XT over the nonturbo, but am a little concerned about MPG.
 
I do think it could be coaxed a bit for higher mpgs. I used to have a Mini Cooper S, which was supercharged, EPA was 28hwy, and i consistently got 32 mpg AVERAGE with a 6 speed.
 
What are you guys seeing?
#152 of 174
Re: 09 Forester XT MPG [jrock56] by tinycadon
Mar 19, 2009 (11:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: jrock56 (Mar 19, 2009 10:31 am)

Best I got on 400mi hwy trip was 26mpg (hand calculated at fill up) doing 65-70; 24mpg doing 70-75; mixed-city biased driving has been in the 16-18mpg range.
#153 of 174
Re: 09 Forester XT MPG [tinycadon] by jrock56
Mar 20, 2009 (6:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: tinycadon (Mar 19, 2009 11:07 am)

Do you fill it up with premium?
 
I got great gas mileage on regular before with the MiniS.
 
I guess its just a personal preference.
#154 of 174
Re: 09 Forester XT MPG [jrock56] by tinycadon
Mar 20, 2009 (6:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: jrock56 (Mar 20, 2009 6:04 am)

yes, I use 93 octane, and I keep the tires at 35psi.
#155 of 174
Re: 09 Forester XT MPG [jrock56] by ateixeira
Mar 20, 2009 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: jrock56 (Mar 20, 2009 6:04 am)

You won't do as well but keep in mind the interior is about 5 times as big.
#156 of 174
Re: 09 Forester XT MPG [ateixeira] by jrock56
Mar 20, 2009 (12:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 20, 2009 11:57 am)

True true, the mini is long gone, after 6k in repairs, i had enough.
 
I drove the nonTurbo, just waiting on a turbo to come in to test drive.
#157 of 174
Re: 09 Forester XT MPG [jrock56] by jrock56
Mar 22, 2009 (1:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jrock56 (Mar 20, 2009 12:35 pm)

bit the bullet and LOVIN IT!!!!
 
Got an 09 XT, i wanted the turbo for the extra power, i scored a deal on a demo, so I am happy with it, plus i felt that the nonturbo was just too sluggish when passing.
 
Averaging 21mpg with mainly city driving at this point.
#158 of 174
Re: New vehicle!! [occking] by occking
Mar 24, 2009 (5:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: occking (Mar 13, 2009 9:43 am)

Been two weeks now, have approx 1800 miles. Mostly highway driving, but a fair amount of "rural" 50 mph stuff with few stops. Based on actual consumption, averaging 23.3, trip computer one of which I have not reset for same perior indicates 24.3, I believe. I am a little disappointed that I am not getting any better, although I realize vehicle not broken in yet. Heck, on my 06 Tribeca that I put on 65k, miles, I was averaging approx 20.5 for same type of driving. Sure hope this improves.
 
Was hoping to run into snow, I really wanted to try this out. Have been all around upstate NY last few days, Plattsburg over to Massena, now back down in Lake Placid tonight. Saw a few patches of snow on the sides of the road, but not enough to driver over.
 
Oh well, may have to wait until next year.
#159 of 174
Three week update! by occking
Mar 31, 2009 (3:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: occking (Mar 24, 2009 5:49 pm)

For those out there interested in "real world mileage" I have read so many posts on this an other boards claiming unrealisticall high mpg on this vehicle (like over 30) as well as some extremely low. I will be a frequent poster on this board (maybe I like reading my own posts) but all of you can be assured when I give mpg figures they are not pullled out of a hat, or based on what the trip computer says over a stretch going 50 mph on a rural road (which will be quite inflated.
 
For the first three weeks, mileage per trip computer 24.6. Actual mileage based on actual gas usage was 24.1. It was actually 23.9 but I know when I got the vehicle from the dealer although "filled" it was not "to the brim" and probably was at least a gallon short of being full.
 
That being said, pretty close, only .5 miles difference. On my trip today, Providence RI out near Brattleboro, VT and return mpg per trip computer was 26.4, and actual was 26. Did much better on second half coming home as I was mostly on turnpike going out, but more "rural roads" coming home.
 
Kind of hoping as this vehicle gets broken in rthe mpg will improve. Also, warmer weather will help a bit as well. I would have loved to have the "turbo" but I know the mpg would suffer, probably average low twenties, plus premium fuel. I am surprised how few turbos dealers even have in stock. Over 30 Foresters at the dealer I bought from but just one Turbo (that seems to be sitting with no takers)
 
Will keep the board posted as I increase mileage. I think another 500+ mile trip coming up on Thursday.
#160 of 174
Re: Three week update! [occking] by tinycadon
Mar 31, 2009 (4:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: occking (Mar 31, 2009 3:45 pm)

occking, I own a 2009 Forester XT and I was able to get 26mpg on a trip from Baltimore to Providence, cruise control for as much of the trip as possible (very tough to do on 95 through the Northeast) and doing 65-70mph. This was not a computer display number, this was my actual calculation from fill up to fill up + trip mileage. If I can do 26mpgs in a turbo then I completely believe that people who have posted 30mpg in their NA Forester are telling the truth and were able to get that result.

Messages Page 16 of 18
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement