You are here: Forums Wagons Volvo V70 Volvo V70 MPG-Real World Numbers

Volvo V70 MPG-Real World Numbers

40 messages,  Last post on Jun 25, 2009 at 1:17 PM

You are in the Volvo V70 Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Volvo V70, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Wagon

Messages Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#35 of 40 Highway mileage 2004 V70 base non-turbo, 5-spd auto by jim314 Feb 19, 2008 (7:57 pm)
Round trip Dallas TX to San Francisco CA to drop off a relative. Outbound was with two people and luggage. Inbound me only and less than half of luggage. This base model has no trip computer so these mpg's are hand calculated from fuel pump fillup volumes and trip odometer readings. Highway speed of travel were in the range of slightly below posted to 5 mph over posted, so often 80 mph in AZ and NM. No significant drafting on trucks. Tires 195/65-15 Michelin MXV4+ Energy (51 psi max infl press) inflated to 41 psi before trip and not checked during trip.   Overall 3984 mi on 128.3 gal of mostly Shell 90 or 91 octane AKI "V-Power" => 31.0 mpg. Twelve fillups. If the two legs with significant lower mpg (* and **) are excluded as outliers, then 3258 mi on 101.0 gal => 32.2 mpg.   1. Dallas to Amarillo TX: 384.2 mi on 15.236 gal => 25.2 mpg* (incl. urban Dallas) 2. to Albuquerque NM: 291.4 mi on 9.472 gal => 30.8 mpg 3. to Flagstaff AZ: 330.7 mi on 10.333 gal => 32.0 mpg 4. to Ludlow CA: 306.3 mi on 9.802 gal => 31.2 mpg 5. to Delano CA 216.4 mi on 6.805 gal => 31.8 mpg 6. to Moss Beach CA 378.2 mi on 11.828 gal => 32.7 mpg (incl some urban SF) 7. to Wasco CA: 342.2 mi on 12.043 gal => 28.4 mpg** 8. to Needles CA: 303.9 mi on 9.035 gal => 33.6 mpg 9. to Williams AZ: 347.7 mi on 11.519 gal =>30.2 mpg (incl. Grand Canyon NP) 10. to Moriarty NM: 401.8 mi on 11.774 gal => 34.1 mpg 11. to Amarillo TX: 300.5 mi on 8.806 gal => 34.1 mpg 12. to Dallas TX: 380.7 mi on 11.664 gal => 32.6 mpg (incl side trips to Palo Duro Canyon SP and Copper Breaks SP at Quanah TX and re-entry into Dallas through thick urban traffic for 40 miles)   NB 1. The last urban tank before the trip yielded 20.1 mpg. 2. The V70 allowed me to sleep in the back of the vehicle with rear seat folded flat (return trip) in Grand Canyon NP and in Palo Duro Canyon State Park TX. Replies to this message: jim314 (Feb 20, 2008 6:59 pm)
#36 of 40 Re: Highway mileage 2004 V70 base non-turbo, 5-spd auto [jim314] by jim314 Feb 20, 2008 (6:59 pm)
Replying to: jim314 (Feb 19, 2008 7:57 pm) Engine oil in the 04 V70 was Mobile1 10W-30 Extended Performance (guaranteed for 15,000 mi or 1 year) which has been in for almost a year and maybe 12,000 miles. I'll change it soon with 6 qt of the same oil. I have not had to add any oil since the last change a year ago. After the trip the odometer read about 34,000 mi, so the engine is in its prime.
#37 of 40 mileage by orangelebaron Feb 23, 2008 (10:58 am)
My 2000 V70 non-turbo averages around 21-22 mostly suburban. My 2005 Subaru Outback 2.5 non turbo is getting only 18 mpg with a 4 cyl with the same driving. Replies to this message: jim314 (Feb 23, 2008 11:24 am) orangelebaron (Mar 01, 2008 11:46 pm)
#38 of 40 Re: mileage [orangelebaron] by jim314 Feb 23, 2008 (11:24 am)
Replying to: orangelebaron (Feb 23, 2008 10:58 am) AWD and higher ground clearance of the Outback come at a cost in fuel efficiency. The Volvo inline 5-cyl may be inherently lower in internal losses than the Subaru flat-4, and maybe the Volvo I-5 has engine controls more optimized for fuel efficiency. How do the ride and handling of these two vehicles compare? Replies to this message: orangelebaron (Mar 01, 2008 11:46 pm)
#39 of 40 Re: mileage [jim314] by orangelebaron Mar 01, 2008 (11:46 pm)
Replying to: jim314 (Feb 23, 2008 11:24 am) While the Subaru is more fun to drive and can handle potholes better without a banging noise, I believe the Volvo rides better. The Subaru, because it is higher and narrower, bobs and heaves on uneven roads. You know those toys with the heads on springs? That's what my neck feels like sometimes in the Subaru. It will also toss everything in the cargo up in the air if you go over a crest quickly. They both handle well.... but there is a certain point in the Subaru where if you are going around a curve on the highway a little too fast, the back of the vehicle will suddenly lift up and over a little bit... happened a couple of times...didn't like it.The Volvo may actually hold the road a little better. The transmission in the Volvo doesn't inspire much confidence as it sometimes feels like it will break again (like it did at 60K... very expensive), but at least it doesn't sometimes refuse to shift as does the Subaru.   All in all, the Volvo is a much more comfortable car and although the Outback appears to be larger when parked tandem, the V70 is a tiny bit wider and much more roomy and thought out inside. That extra interior width makes it easier to place my mountain bike in the back.   If Volvo made their cars more reliable and a little less costly to own and maintain, I would see no reason to look at Subaru.
#40 of 40 05 V70 2.5T Mileage by gregd396 Jun 25, 2009 (1:17 pm)
I just picked up a used 2005 V70 2.5T (LP Turbo, 5speed geartronic, FWD) and was somewhat let down by the mpg, but I can't complain too much for a car with such good performance. My numbers are with tires at 39 psi, castrol syntec 10w30, new air filter.   On a flat highway, cruise set at 55 mph, A/C off, I averaged 31.5 mpg Increase to 65 mph and it drops to 28.5 mpg And so on... 75 mph gets you about 26 mpg City driving has gotten me 18-19 mpg so far   So my experience matches the "new" EPA estimate of 18/27. If you have an extremely light foot you should be able to get the old window sticker rating of 21/30, but what fun is that?

Messages Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Wagons Volvo V70 Volvo V70 MPG-Real World Numbers