Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Taurus/Sable MPG-Real World Numbers
59 messages, Last post on Mar 09, 2009 at 7:47 PM
You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
Any new owners there to report back on real-world mileage with the new 3.5?
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Oct 29, 2007 12:43 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bobber1 (Oct 29, 2007 6:28 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Oct 29, 2007 7:03 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: desertrat5 (Nov 03, 2007 3:16 pm) |
|
|
We have a 2008 Sable with about 600 miles on it.. So far, I have gotten 22 and 24 mpg on two tanks. This is pretty disappointing to me even though the car's not broken in yet. The sticker said 28 hwy and I have a feeling that's never going to happen. By comparison, I rented a 2008 Milan two weeks ago and drove it pretty hard for three days. The Milan only had 20 miles on it when I picked it up.. When I checked the milage on that car it beat the sticker giving me 27 mpg. On a brighter note; I love the car. I handles well, rides well and I love the "Sync." Don't count on 28 mpg hwy as it probably isn't going to happen unless you happen to like driving  45 mph.. 
|
|
|
Replying to: 777guy (Jan 14, 2008 3:50 pm) What was your mix of city & highway? Do you cruise at 80 mph on highway? Are you an aggressive drier? Are you in a state where gas has higher concentration of ethanol? Nothing like buried the car on mpg issue before 1000 miles logged onto it. 
|
|
|
Replying to: godaddy1 (Jan 15, 2008 6:28 am) 95% of this driving was done on the highway 70 mph. All of the highway driving occurred with the cruise control engaged.... No ethanol in this part of Texas. The fist tank where I got about 24 mpg occurred in the flat lands and the second tank was in the Hill country going up and down some reasonably steep hills. |
|
|
Replying to: pf_flyer (Jun 12, 2006 8:09 am) Power is quite good for a V-6, 260 HP and it shifts very smooth with the 6 speed Automatic. The oil filter is located in a pretty good spot and I use my drive up ramps using 5W-20 oil every 7500 miles. I changed at 2500 the first time to get factory grit out of the engine as I tend to keep cars quite a long time. This car starts every time and never misses no matter what temperature__4-8 degree mornings for us. The only problem, I had was an out of adjustment cruise control switch on the brake pedal that would kick out the cruise occasionally. I took it to a nearby Ford dealer for a quick fix and that was it. I did buy the extended 6 year/100K mile warranty since I still remember the $1800.00 Sun visors that went bad with Home-Link/Visor lights wiring shorts that wiped out the Digital Dash (which I miss). I had the mechanic wire around for $80 each time on each visor instead, to bypass the visors. I will know more about this car in about 100K miles. The room in this car is phenomenal, especially in the rear seats and the trunk is large, though space is awkward, but still handles large suit cases for international travel quite well. The courtesy lights on this car are great and the interior controls grow on you after awhile. The plug-ins are plentiful for our Radar Detector, phone charger Fr/Rr, ipod, etc. This is the car Ford/Mercury is pushing as they neglect the Grand Marquis design. The price was quite good with $3000 rebates and trade. We ordered and waited 2 months to get the Sage color we wanted w/ Camel interior and light plastic wood. I feel this car is the precursor for the upcoming Lincoln MKS, which has a better looking C pillar, dished out chrome wheels, and a few more gadgets. My wife did not like the front end of that car on the websites we viewed. Our car had every option except the rear DVD player and it has plenty of toys to play with. We get quite a few compliments on the color and look of the car as they tried to make it look closer to the smaller Milan (mileage is not much better on the Milan than with the larger Sable). Overall, I would recommend this car to anyone who drives a lot of miles and hauls 3-4 people often, as well as drives it to work daily. I regret buying the extended warranty, but for the overall price I feel good about the purchase as this car goes to Chicago quite often (600 mile trips) Our mileage: We normally drive on Interstates about 65-75+ MPH regularly and do some town driving. I select regular gas w/o ethanol to avoid the 2-3 mpg loss, which I have tested. The weather is now cold in Southern Illinois which also cost about 1-2 MPG. If I keep my foot out of it, mileage does go up about 1-2 MPG. We get about 23-26 MPG on trips and 18-20 MPG going to work__5 miles away. (not much better than what we got on the 2000 Grand Marquis) Good Luck to all.
|
|
|
Replying to: dmers1 (Jan 24, 2008 5:06 pm) Zero problems with my car so far. The only thing I wish it had was a telescoping steering wheel like my Honda van has. I really like Auto Climate control on these cars.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Taurus/Sable MPG-Real World Numbers
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Taurus
2009 Mercury Sable
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
