Sign In Join 



Dodge Caliber MPG-Real World Numbers

221 messages,  Last post on Jun 09, 2009 at 5:10 PM

You are in the Dodge Caliber Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Dodge Caliber, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Wagon


Messages Page 21 of 23
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#193 of 221
Re: Real world MPG..getting better [habalanche] by jaxs1
Jul 30, 2007 (5:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habalanche (Jul 30, 2007 4:52 pm)

It probably will get good mileage on a 1500 highway trip, as will many cars --even some larger cars with bigger engines.
 
However, what really matters is what mileage it will get on your typical day to day driving.
#194 of 221
more numbers by airnos
Aug 03, 2007 (5:22 pm)
Reply
I'm back...
 
Took my new Caliber on a road trip last week and had 28, 30, 31, 25 for the mileage. The last tank was mixed and also involved me hauling some things around for a friend.
 
Typical driving for me is about 60/40 highway vs. town. Latest number was 26.16. For mixed driving as applied to Atlanta (i.e., it's rarely possible to drive for the mpg) I think that's pretty decent.
#195 of 221
Re: more numbers [airnos] by airnos
Oct 01, 2007 (8:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: airnos (Aug 03, 2007 5:22 pm)

Back again. I'm now just under 5000 miles and I'm solidly averaging 27 in Atlanta traffic, about 60/40 highway/street since I live in midtown. I'm a bit of a featherfoot and love coasted stops, but there is a limit to how much of that can be done in Atlanta.
 
On road trips I routinely run 30-31. Again, I'm a bit of a featherfoot but only a bit -- yes, I do run 70-75 mph on the Interstate.
 
These numbers have been remarkably consistent since 1700 miles or so.
#196 of 221
Why such low mileage for a small car? by gordonwd
Oct 03, 2007 (10:09 am)
Reply
We're getting interested in the Caliber as a car for my wife. Mileage is not a huge issue with us, but I was sort of wondering why this car doesn't do a whole lot better. My BMW 325i gets 24 around town and 30 on the highway. In fact, the big Olds Intrigue that we will be getting rid of doesn't do much less that what is being reported here for the Caliber! On the other hand, the Caliber seems quite heavy for its physical size, so that might be a big reason.
#197 of 221
Re: Why such low mileage for a small car? [gordonwd] by jmech
Oct 03, 2007 (10:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: gordonwd (Oct 03, 2007 10:09 am)

Weight(3000 lbs) is one reason. The car is stronger for safety and gets great front and side impact ratings as a result. The other is increased EPA standards required for 2007.
You are correct about the MPG. I get up to 24 city and up to 34 highway. I average about 25 mpg for mixed driving.
Many of my previous cars used to get better mpg, but then the EPA was not as strict as it is now.
You should see good traction in snow as I have. The extra ground clearance helps too.
You will like the Caliber as I have. Its been reliable so far(19,000 miles)with no issues.
#198 of 221
Re: Why such low mileage for a small car? [gordonwd] by jim314
Oct 03, 2007 (12:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gordonwd (Oct 03, 2007 10:09 am)

The BMW is an expensively engineered vehicle optimized for a combination of performance and economy on smooth pavement which the European market demands. It costs over twice as much as a Caliber, and every repair will be at least twice as much.
 
BMW achieves good fuel economy by optimizing aerodynamics in part by having minimal ground clearance, and the engine requiring premium unleaded, the sign of a higher compression engine. It probably has very expensive engine controls.
 
I don't mind the fact that my 2.4L 168 hp NA I-5 Volvo V70 (which I got as a hand-me-down) requires premium 91 AKI to achieve EPA 30 mpg highway (I get up to 35 mpg driven carefully on IHs). The compression ratio is over 10:1. But a lot of people in the US begrudge every penny that fuel costs so a requirement for premium fuel in a moderate priced car would be fatal.
#200 of 221
Re: more numbers [airnos] by pmkon7
Nov 16, 2007 (11:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: airnos (Oct 01, 2007 8:33 pm)

I am interested in ordering a caliber
What model, engine, and transmission combination do you have?
#201 of 221
Re: more numbers [pmkon7] by pmkon7
Nov 20, 2007 (5:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmkon7 (Nov 16, 2007 11:54 am)

Me again. I am debating 1.8/manual vs. 2.0/CVT on a new 2008 model.
 
I am a conservative driver and the vast majority of my miles are highway.
 
airnos, gordonwd - I am happy to here you both are getting good MPG, just curious about your model /engine/transmission combinations.
 
Anybody else can jump in too.
#202 of 221
Re: more numbers [pmkon7] by lexan1965
Nov 20, 2007 (8:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmkon7 (Nov 20, 2007 5:24 pm)

I'd pay the extra 1000k for the CVT if I were you. It's amazing to drive, very smooth.
I've had my SXT for 1.5 yrs now, have 54K miles on it and just replaced my 17" tires which make the car ride much nicer than 15" tires on other Calibers. I'm consistantly getting 30 mpg on my car with no issues at all. This the best compact car I have ever owned.

Messages Page 21 of 23
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement