Sign In Join 



Dodge Caliber MPG-Real World Numbers

221 messages,  Last post on Jun 09, 2009 at 5:10 PM

You are in the Dodge Caliber Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Dodge Caliber, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Wagon


Messages Page 19 of 22
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#181 of 221
Re: My MPG [habalanche] by farout
Jun 25, 2007 (3:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habalanche (Jun 25, 2007 9:45 am)

habalanche: The RT AWD fas a 2.4 engine as well, plus it's weight is about 3,350 lbs. The old 1996 Neon we have is less than 2,600 lbs but gets 28mpg with a 194,000 miles. Our 2007 Jeep Compass gets 23 to 25mpg depending on a lot of things, like temp., wind direction, if the gas is 10% eth. and so forth. Considering this Caliver, and the Compass have side air curtians, ESP, and anti lock brakes and a better saftey rating 26 mpg is ok. Consider the Chevy Aveo, it gets 25 mpg tops!
   My only issue is the 2.4 just lacks quick get up and go. At passing speeds it moves very well, but not from a dead start. These 2.4 world engines need some refinement on a quicker start. Other than that we find it has lots of room and is pretty smooth.
 
farout
#182 of 221
Re: My MPG [farout] by habalanche
Jun 26, 2007 (12:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: farout (Jun 25, 2007 3:46 pm)

Hey Farout.I agree with everything you said I like the Caliber,and as for getting 26mpg Hwy I was pleasantly surprised.Like you said good on the HWY but 0-20 does suck.
#183 of 221
Re: My MPG [habalanche] by bigtsr
Jun 26, 2007 (4:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habalanche (Jun 26, 2007 12:35 pm)

Have you bothered to have the latest TSB#18-031-07
done on your Calibers yet?
It applies to any Caliber with a build date before
April 28,2007 and it resolves your complaint regarding
acceleration plus quiets engine with improved mpg.
#184 of 221
Re: My MPG [bigtsr] by habalanche
Jun 26, 2007 (6:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigtsr (Jun 26, 2007 4:21 pm)

I had mine in two weeks ago for the lack of pwr at 0-20 and they did reflash the computer but I'm not sure of the #.All I know is that it running alot better since then.And I no longer want to get rid of a car that I really like except,for it's poor mileage and lack of pwr.If the mpg stays above 20 I'll be happy.I cannot live without AWD and I'll gladly trade mpg for driveability in snow.
#185 of 221
Re: My MPG [bigtsr] by daveydodge
Jun 27, 2007 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: bigtsr (Jun 26, 2007 4:21 pm)

So, if I am getting 27 mpg on my 2.0L CVT Caliber SXT that I ordered from the factory and received last August of 2006, I should still get my computer reflashed even if things are running fine?? Just asking...I now have 17,800 miles and have had no problems running on Mobile 1 Synthetic and would buy another one at this point and recommend them to friends and family. Dollar for dollar...I find it unrealistic to bash the Caliber and be disappointed in it's looks, drive and performance!!
#186 of 221
Re: My MPG [daveydodge] by bigtsr
Jun 28, 2007 (4:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: daveydodge (Jun 27, 2007 5:52 am)

The latest flash is to resolve sluggish acceleration
0-30 mph and resolve the sometime noisey diesel like
sound emanating from the engine at idle or low rpm
acceleration.
A byproduct of the flash is increased mpg as has
been posted on several forums by those having had it
done to their Calibers,my mpg increased by 4mpg
in city driving and 1-2 on hiway and 0-30
acceleration is totally different.
So if you have these traits or concerns it's
up to you to decide how to proceed.
By the way my Caliber SXT 2.0L/CVT was a June 06 build.
#187 of 221
41 tanks, average 30.8 MPG by litesong1
Jul 04, 2007 (3:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bigtsr (Jun 28, 2007 4:12 am)

Haven't posted since 5-4-07. With the continueing warmer weather, summer mix gas, & longer trips, my MPG continues to rise. Also I found that my odometer was incorrect, -2%, so all my previous MPG reports were 2% too low.
 
With my SE Caliber 2 liter w/CVT, my highway high is 35.6MPG, trips over 4000 foot mountain passes from sea level average 32.8MPG, & my overall average including a miserable winter w/41 tanks of gas is 30.8 MPG. The overall average will continue to rise to 31+ MPG till my first year of ownership, & then colder weather & winter mix gas will lower MPG again like last year. The CVT responds well on steep mountain grades as long as you don't rush thru them. Work to maintain speed thru corners & not have to accelerate hard up slope. Drop your speed. Enjoy the mountains. You will also enjoy your mountain MPG.
#188 of 221
New EPA milage formula website by bigtsr
Jul 11, 2007 (9:56 am)
Reply
Here is the link to EPA website
using the new mpg formulas.
I think some Caliber owners will be suprised!!!!
 
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/sbs.htm
#189 of 221
Re: Numbers to consider for MPG... [aaron_t] by airnos
Jul 22, 2007 (8:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: aaron_t (Apr 26, 2006 4:43 am)

I'm not sure why you keep throwing the Corolla into the mix. Yes, it is a compact, but does not have the utility of a hatchback/5-dr nor the look/image. People are not cross shopping the appliance Corolla with hatchbacks.
 
Agreed. I just traded a Corolla in good condition and making good mileage, for a Caliber. My express reason was the cargo capacity. The SE w/options that I got was STILL cheaper than a local Matrix, and I was thrilled to only have to give up a few mpg in order to get the cargo capacity I wanted.
 
I'm only half done with the first tank of gas and in mixed driving in Atlanta am already getting 22.22 mpg. Could be better, but I'm assuming the dealer put gas in right before I bought the car (he knew I was coming, but that's still an assumption) and I don't expect the best mileage until about the third tank. Plus, Atlanta requires A/C use and a certain amount of stop-and-go.
 
Best mileage ever on my Corolla (which I bought used) was 41 mpg on a highway trip in the winter. But in practical application, lately I'd been getting 28-30. So if I can beat 25 in the Caliber, I'll be satisfied. Because I'm still coming out ahead with respect to cargo capacity and safety features.
 
I once bought straight on mileage and chose a 1996 Nissan 200SX w/AT (bad back -- I can operate a stick but not if I want to drive more than an hour or so at a time). Using octane booster, at 10K on the Nissan I got 52 mpg on a highway trip. That car was great, but it also had low power and lousy cargo capacity. Times and needs change...
#190 of 221
Real world MPG..getting better by gman55
Jul 29, 2007 (7:52 am)
Reply
I never had a CVT or AWD before. Bought mine in Feb 07. Started out with 25.6 mpg ( 90% of my drive is hwy). During the spring I got used to the CVT and started paying attention to the mpg's. As of today I'm getting 28.9 mpgs. Seems that the longer I drive it the better the mpgs become.
 
BTW I bought my RT/AWD with 2400K on it...it was a buy-back from Dodge (lemon-law). The disclosure indicated that the "check engine" light came on 3 times and couldn't be fixed...After the buy-back Dodge techs found that the "codes" were wrong and corrected that problem...haven't had a problem since I bought it...13.5K on it now.
 
How would I know if the latest TSB#18-031-07 was applied? Would I have to take it in to dealer for that or is there another way to find out?

Messages Page 19 of 22
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement