Entry-Level Luxury Performance Sedans

16087 messages,  Last post on May 09, 2013 at 9:32 AM

You are in the Cadillac CTS/CTS-V Forum.

What is this discussion about? BMW 3 Series, Infiniti G37, Acura TL, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes-Benz C-Class, Cadillac CTS, Volvo S60, Audi A4, Acura TSX, Car Comparisons, Sedan

#15329 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [flightnurse] by habitat1

Dec 06, 2012 (2:14 pm)

Replying to: flightnurse (Dec 06, 2012 1:43 pm)
Probably right. Better to leave well enough alone, and simply reminisce about what a mere $32k bought me in 2001

#15330 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [flightnurse] by sweendogy

Dec 06, 2012 (2:51 pm)

Replying to: flightnurse (Dec 06, 2012 1:43 pm)
What if they put that 6 in the trunk- ?

#15331 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [sweendogy] by habitat1

Dec 06, 2012 (3:01 pm)

Replying to: sweendogy (Dec 06, 2012 2:51 pm)
....and called it a Boxster??

#15332 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [habitat1] by sweendogy

Dec 06, 2012 (6:40 pm)

Replying to: habitat1 (Dec 06, 2012 3:01 pm)
Only if they marked it up 15k, because they are the most profitable company in the world.

#15333 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [habitat1] by ivan_99

Dec 06, 2012 (11:49 pm)

Replying to: habitat1 (Dec 06, 2012 2:14 pm)
what a mere $32k bought me in 2001
 
what would be 41.8K in today's dollars (ouch)...or 10K less than a BASE Cayman.

#15334 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [ivan_99] by plekto

Dec 07, 2012 (1:44 am)

Replying to: ivan_99 (Dec 06, 2012 11:49 pm)
It's good to hear that they finally fixed the issue to a certain extent, but the issue was only finally fixed in 2009. All Porsche designs that use the intermediate shaft design are going to fail. Not if, but when. Sure, they did other tricks to keep the things lasting a bit longer, but the overall design itself was rubbish.
 
Just something to keep in mind when you think about buying a "2 to 3 year old Cayman". Be *sure* it's a 2009 or newer model, since the engines are horrendously expensive to fix.

#15335 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [plekto] by habitat1

Dec 07, 2012 (7:19 am)

Replying to: plekto (Dec 07, 2012 1:44 am)
Not sure where you got your Porsche expertise, but you aren't related to my brother in law, are you? As a union electrical contractor, he is essentially forced to buy GM or Ford or suffer career consequences. So he comes up with comments like "I'd be holding my breath" on expensive repairs, mechanical failures, etc. when I bought a 911S back in 2005. As it turned out, he went through two Cadillac Escalades in the 5 1/2 years I had the 911, took massive depreciation hits on both, had POS quality issues with each, and had to actually sue his GM dealer over warrant repairs that were faulty. I had 3-4 oil changes and 1-2 minor warranty repairs that were all handled professionally. Yes, Porsche hourly service rates are definitely higher than Joe Goodwrench. But fortunately, I didn't need to use them, other than for a few oil changes. And my experience, as well as that of my colleagues, has been consistent with the fact that Porsche and Lexus have been interchanging top spots for quality and reliability the past several years.
 
If you have had first hand Porsche experience to the contrary, sorry to hear that. Porsche is good, but by no means perfect, and the pre-2005 996 RMS issues were not handled as well as they should have been. But, if you are related to my brother in law and perhaps have an axe to grind against someone who prefers Porsche to Scion, that's not my issue to address.

#15336 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [ivan_99] by habitat1

Dec 07, 2012 (7:40 am)

Replying to: ivan_99 (Dec 06, 2012 11:49 pm)
what would be 41.8K in today's dollars (ouch)...or 10K less than a BASE Cayman.
 
I seem to recall a new Honda S2000 was still under $36,000 when they ended production for 2010. In November 2001 (2002 MY), the S2000 was at least $15-25k+ less than all of its competition of the day - SLK, Boxster S (base Boxster was only 201hp), Z3 3.0i.
 
In addition, the S2000 had an options list that had exactly 1 item on it: pick your color. Everything else was standard - leather interior, power roof, etc.. It was a pretty spartan car compared to a Lexus, but it delivered on true sports car performance and engineering that only the Boxster S could match at a price of $55k, reasonably equipped. Which has now grown close to $75k, similarly equipped in 2013. Even the Base Boxster today - albeit a enormously improved car compared to the 2002 base Boxster - is $60k+ with "normal" options. A base Cayman for $52k?? Are you sure you don't want a steering wheel with that, sir?
 
P.S. Edmund's Host, if you are watching: I recall that when I bought my 2002 S2000 in November 2001, the MSRP was $32,880 and Edmunds TMV for the DC region was $36,000, $3,200 OVER MSRP. In California, it was higher still. Perhpas you can check Edmunds archives to verify? This was 2 full years after the car was first introduced. The high demand, limited supply was still resulting in dealer premiums. I only got a discount because of an early snowfall, 10 weeks after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. By the following spring, I had offers to sell the car for more than I paid for it - back to the dealer.

#15337 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [habitat1] by kyfdx HOST

Dec 08, 2012 (6:48 am)

Replying to: habitat1 (Dec 07, 2012 7:40 am)
Here you go
 
Research to your heart's content...

#15338 of 16087 Re: Preferences vs. "Better" [kyfdx] by habitat1

Dec 08, 2012 (7:07 am)

Replying to: kyfdx (Dec 08, 2012 6:48 am)
Thanks, although that doesn't show what Edmunds TMV was back in 2001. Which...is just fine. I need to reprioritize my time and focus on the future if I'm going to be able to write the check for a Cayman S come April.
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement