Ask the Car People.SM


Acura TSX vs. Lexus IS 250

318 messages,  Last post on Jun 14, 2007 at 3:18 PM

You are in the Lexus IS Forum.

What is this discussion about? Acura TSX, Lexus IS 250, Car Comparisons, Sedan

Messages Page 2 of 32

#8 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [joemale] by dc_dave

Dec 07, 2005 (7:40 am)

Replying to: joemale (Dec 06, 2005 10:47 pm)
Because when you have a bike that costs 6k you don't want it to be exposed
 
Actually its because I have a time trial bike (tour de france) that has a disc wheel in the back that will not work with roof mounted racks. I could go with a trunk-mounted rack but I would still like the option of fitting it inside if needed. And to answer your question, yes, a bike will fit inside no problem when the seats are folded down.
 
Dave in VA

#9 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [dc_dave] by david1973

Dec 07, 2005 (11:17 am)

Replying to: dc_dave (Dec 07, 2005 7:37 am)
VW and Audi are owned by the same companies. That doesn't necessary make them the same in terms of dealer support. I have read stories where Audi has seperated there QA from VW to improve the quality of the products. Audi has done very well on recent 90 day reports. If that translates into long term reliability is up in the air at this point. It is definitely a check mark against them compared to lexus/acura.

#10 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [david1973] by dc_dave

Dec 07, 2005 (1:33 pm)

Replying to: david1973 (Dec 07, 2005 11:17 am)
Yes, I keep telling myself the same thing, trying to justify a reason to look at the A3 3.2 S-line. I love this car and its perfect for me BUT I'm currently in a war with VW of NA and my local VW dealer. They have pissed me off so much that I just don't think I can support their operation. Trust me, I'm totally bummed. I was in Europe this summer admiring the A3's all over the place and telling my wife...there's my next car. I don't know maybe Audi service is totally separate but they share the same roof in Auburn Hills, MI so I'm going to lump them together.
 
Dave in VA
 

#11 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [david1973] by dc_dave

Dec 07, 2005 (3:04 pm)

Replying to: david1973 (Dec 05, 2005 11:42 pm)
"IS has ventilated seats and push start) and an extra couple of inches of rear seat room. It also had the "metal" trim which I prefer to the wood."
 
Which one has the metal trim, the lexus or acura? In the photos I've looked at on the web it seems like metal trim is an option on the acura but all the lexus' come with a wood center console? Is this true, I think the IS 250 would look much better with all metal trip inside. Also, looking at the specs, the acura seems to have more space in the rear seats, maybe in person its different?
 
Dave in VA
 
Dave in VA

#12 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [dc_dave] by david1973

Dec 07, 2005 (3:22 pm)

Replying to: dc_dave (Dec 07, 2005 3:04 pm)
Sorry for the confusing sentence. The tsx is normally a metal trim. I think one of the colors packages has wood but I haven't seen it. The IS250 base model has a metallic trim. As far as I know, that car doesn't exist outside of lexus's web site. On the lots Yyou have to order some package which adds wood. There is a sports package that keeps the metallic trim but I thik it might be 350 only. I would much rather have metal. The rear seats of the TSX definitely have an extra couple of inches of seat room.

#13 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [david1973] by dc_dave

Dec 07, 2005 (4:14 pm)

Replying to: david1973 (Dec 07, 2005 3:22 pm)
Yeah, I was also wondering if you can add the sports package to the IS 250. On edmunds and cars.com's configulator you can add it to the IS250 but on the lexus website you cannot? If I were to get the IS 250, all I want is the sports package; I think this brings the MSRP up to 35K, not bad.
 
Dave in VA

#14 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [dc_dave] by fedlawman

Dec 07, 2005 (7:35 pm)

Replying to: dc_dave (Dec 07, 2005 4:14 pm)
The toyota and lexus websites are notorious for pre-selecting option packages for you without the abilty to remove them. I think it's based on your zip code.
 
Anyways, I'm sure you can factory order/dealer trade for the exact car and features you want.

#15 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [fedlawman] by david1973

Dec 08, 2005 (12:44 am)

Replying to: fedlawman (Dec 07, 2005 7:35 pm)
The dealer I talked to said that the sports package was only available on the 350. Dealers have been wrong before though.

#16 of 318 Re: TSX vs. IS250 [david1973] by hokipoki

Dec 08, 2005 (11:16 am)

Replying to: david1973 (Dec 08, 2005 12:44 am)
Sports package is available on the RWD Lexus IS cars (IS250MT, IS250Auto, IS350Auto). It looks like it might not be available on IS250 AWD. They are not making many with sports package so these might have to be special ordered which takes about 3 months.

#17 of 318 2006 TSX vs. 2006 IS 250 by toyotaf1fan

Dec 09, 2005 (2:10 am)

Replying to: hokipoki (Dec 08, 2005 11:16 am)
Have taken both cars for a test drive now...here are my thoughts.
 
Styling
 
  The Lexus is a wonderful looking car. Everything about it screams goegeous. There isn't a bad angle looking at it. The interior is well designed too. You can feel the quality in each of the controls, and the sterling colour options looks amazing.
  The TSX is more conservative. It is still a good looking car, but just doesn't grab my attention the same way. The interior feels more sporty than the lexus. (which is the way a sports sedan should be) But like its exterior, the interior just doesn't grab my attention the same way.
  Winner: Lexus
  
Driving
  The lexus is a smooth customer. Its ride is all about pampering the driver. Thus, you don't feel too many connections with the car. The Steering was a little light, and the engine was underpowered but smooth. While driving this car you can really feel its weight. But, the biggest disapointment came with its manual tranny. The lexus had a sloppy tranny with the worst hydrolic clutch I've ever tried. I could not feel when it was engaging or releasing the drive shaft. For a "sport" sedan this was a major letdown. Considering the IS 300 had one the best manual transmissions, this was a huge dissapointment. A descent tranny could have let me forget all the other shortcomings.
  The TSX has a sporty ride to it but contains the road imperfections well. The car connects with its driver, and begs to be pushed. The steering which is a little too heavy at parking lot speeds comes in handy when pushing the car to its limits. The engine wanted to be pushed and could do so with ease. Those extra horses in this years model are helpful. The car felt very responsive and agile. The manual tranny continues to be one of the best on the market. Its clutch is perfect and the tranny does wonders with its short throws. This car is a drivers car.
 
Winner: TSX
 
Value
 
In Canada the IS 250 doesn't have much value to it at all. A IS with the same options as the TSX is worth more than 42,600. Thats 7 thousand more than a TSX. Although its key-less entry and air conditioned seats are cool, there is no need for a 204 horsepower car to cost this much. The car does have alot of style to it, but considering the back seats are useless (I'm 6.2 and my 5.7 115 pound wife can't sit behind me) the lack of trunk space, horrible manual tranny and price, this car just doesn't make sense. After expecting soo much this car falls way too short.
 
Considering the TSX is more than 7 thousand dollars cheaper and the only option you can get is NAV, it seems well priced. The car is fun to drive. The engine, transmission, livable rear seats, trunk, stereo and all kinds of storage space get you by the cars placid looks. A car that wants to be driven is the car I want to drive.
 
Winner: TSX

Messages Page 2 of 32

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement