Sign In Join 



Hyundai Azera Real World MPG

282 messages,  Last post on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:27 AM

You are in the Hyundai Azera Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Azera, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan


Messages Page 26 of 29
1
...
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#243 of 282
Slower Speed, Use of Cruise Control and Acceleration Technique are Key by garym1j
Jun 21, 2008 (1:27 pm)
Reply
I can nurse my 07 Limited Azera to 30 MPG highway if I use the good driver techniques. I have actually noticed 30.3 between 60-70 MPH on flat terrain after driving several hours. I like to think that there is an egg under the pedal when accelerating from stops and other times. I can maintain not less than 27 around town if I accelerate slowly and smoothly at stoplights. I am very happy with Azera mileage. (Will check car computer using gallons used with mileage attained and report back if a significant difference is noted)
#244 of 282
Re: Slower Speed, Use of Cruise Control and Acceleration Technique are Key [garym1j] by blisowski
Jul 01, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: garym1j (Jun 21, 2008 1:27 pm)

Yeah you are correct--i got 32-33 mpg on a trip to florida and 29-30 on the way back to pittsburgh. I checked computer it sometimes lies aout a mile or two but it check out math wise so the 3.8 does deliver around 21 areound town and 30 on the highway. But really hyundai could improve and what about a fuel cell car?
#245 of 282
Re: Slower Speed, Use of Cruise Control and Acceleration Technique are Key by joezera
Jul 08, 2008 (4:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: garym1j (Jun 21, 2008 1:27 pm)

I agree. We are getting 27.4 mpg. average and our Azera only has about 6K miles on it now. On a trip a while back we got 29.3 mpg. average after resetting the mpg. function. I visited one of the Hypermiling websites and found that in areas with gentle hills I actually got better fuel economy if I allowed the car to speed up going down hills and gradually slow down going up hill. That is one situation where using the cruise control actually hurts fuel economy. On level ground the cruise control wins hands down.
 
If you have a Discover card you can get a Wal-Mart shopping card and put money on it and then use it to get the 3 cent per gallon discount at the Murphy stations associated with Wal-Mart. The discover card will give you one penny back for each dollar spent. Together you save about 7 cents per gallon. In a year's time I figured it would save us about 1.2 to 2/3 of a month's expense for gasoline.
#246 of 282
Re: Slower Speed, Use of Cruise Control and Acceleration Technique are Key [joezera] by hjc1
Jul 08, 2008 (7:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: joezera (Jul 08, 2008 4:31 am)

Check the Discover card web sight. They have several plans. I use one card for only gas purchases only because I can get 5% off up to a certain amount ($4.07 per gal less 5% nets at $3.87 per gal.). I use the other card for regular purchases 1% discount. Great way to know have much gas you buy in 1 year
P.S. I have a 07 Azera with 22,000 miles and averaged 27.6 mpg since new.
Not bad for large car
#247 of 282
MPG comparison - 3.3L and 3.8 L engine by budh
Aug 26, 2008 (10:38 am)
Reply
Being very interested in purchasing a 2009 Azera later this year or early next year, I just wish the gas mileage was a little bit better than it is. If this car rated at 30 mpg on the highway, it would be awesome!
 
Does the larger 3.8L engine really get almost exactly the same mileage as the 3.3L engine? Is there a major reason to have one over the other?
 
And why does the 3.3L engine get a full three highway MPGs less than the Sonata with the same engine? I know the Azera is a little heavier, and I'd expect perhaps a 1 MPG difference, but the drag coefficient is very good in the Azera and once you get the car up to speed, it's only air resistance you are overcoming.
 
2009 Azera Limited V6 3.8L engine, 17/26 mpg, 3629 lbs, 0.29 drag coefficient
2009 Azera GLS V6 3.3L engine, 18/26 mpg, 3629 lbs, 0.29 drag coefficient
2009 Sonata V6 3.3L engine, 19/29 mpg, 3494 lbs, 0.32 drag coefficient
 
(I figured out that for my annual driving, a 3 mpg difference is about $400 a year, which isn't that much, but I still was looking for closer to 30 mpg. But the Azera is looking so much better than an Accord!)
 
Bud H
#248 of 282
Re: MPG comparison - 3.3L and 3.8 L engine [budh] by allmet33
Aug 26, 2008 (10:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: budh (Aug 26, 2008 10:38 am)

If this car rated at 30 mpg on the highway, it would be awesome!
 
Are there ANY large sedans with a FE rating of 30 mpg or better??? Come on, be realistic in your expectations.
 
And why does the 3.3L engine get a full three highway MPGs less than the Sonata with the same engine?
 
Because it's hauling around more car in the Azera.
 
But the Azera is looking so much better than an Accord!
 
It depends on how much car you're looking for, the Accord is classified as a mid-sized sedan and has less space than the Azera. Which, that being the case...if the Accord is on your scope...I would think you would be comparing the Sonata with it. As far as FE with the Azera, there are folks that have claimed 28,29 & 30 mpg highway with the Azera. Personally, I've seen 28 mpg on a trip to FL using cruise control. That with a trunk full of luggage, A/C, along with 3 adults and 2 kids. In the city...FE falls off a great deal, yet...some claim city FE numbers of 17, 18 & 19 mpg. Personally, I see 15-16 mpg city driving.
 
Honestly if FE is that big a deal, then maybe the Sonata would be more your liking.
#249 of 282
Re: MPG comparison - 3.3L and 3.8 L engine [allmet33] by budh
Aug 26, 2008 (11:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: allmet33 (Aug 26, 2008 10:52 am)

For my financial situation, the $400 annual extra fuel cost between an Azera or V6 Sonata (or $800 fuel difference between an Azera and I4 Sonata) isn't that big a deal. And most of my driving in the northern Indiana/southwest Michigan area is highway miles, as I have a 60 mile round trip commute to/from work on highway roads.
 
I was just curious how a much larger 3.8L engine could get the same mileage as the smaller 3.3L engine. Is it that the 3.8L engine is just that good?
 
Bud H
#250 of 282
Re: MPG comparison - 3.3L and 3.8 L engine [budh] by allmet33
Aug 26, 2008 (11:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: budh (Aug 26, 2008 11:01 am)

It is possible that there could have been some minor changes in the newer 3.8 in the '09 Azera as opposed to the original 3.8 in the '06-08 models. Don't really know to be honest. It could boil down to gearing or a few other things. To be honest, you can't go wrong with either car...the Azera is a true pleasure to drive on the highway.
 
Good luck!
#251 of 282
Re: MPG comparison - 3.3L and 3.8 L engine [budh] by cobrazera
Aug 27, 2008 (3:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: budh (Aug 26, 2008 10:38 am)

The Azera may not be rated at 30MPG highway, but it will hit that number in the real world -if you keep below 70MPH on a level road using cruise. My '06 Azera has done it, and so have numerous posters on this thread. Total mileage goes downhill with stop and go stuff, though. If you're planning on lots of highway miles, the Azera does just fine - and on regular gas.
#252 of 282
Re: MPG comparison - 3.3L and 3.8 L engine [budh] by 101649
Aug 27, 2008 (4:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: budh (Aug 26, 2008 10:38 am)

Accord acheives the higher MPG with cylinder deactivation, otherwise it would be worse....

Messages Page 26 of 29
1
...
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement