Sign In Join 



Toyota Camry Hybrid MPG-Real World Numbers

855 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 8:34 AM

You are in the Toyota Camry Hybrid Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry Hybrid, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 86 of 87
1
...
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#844 of 855
Re: orly1 [larsb] by wvgasguy
Feb 13, 2009 (8:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Feb 05, 2009 11:37 am)

I sent you a contact who might be able to help you.
 
I have been watching this with interest. Hope to see the results soon.
 
I can't imagine not being able to match the new EPA levels. When I traded at 67,000 miles my lifetime FE was over 37 and that is in the hills of WV. I wish I was closer to Cleveland as I would love to drive a car someone says has something wrong.
#845 of 855
Re: orly1 [wvgasguy] by orly1
Feb 14, 2009 (10:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wvgasguy (Feb 13, 2009 8:45 am)

hi wvgasguy,
 
there is more than one person on this forum that has posted very disappointing FE and got the "run around from toyota" - they just seem to give up.
 
thanks to larsb pep talk, i hope i will have the energy to pursue this further. the contact has emailed me and has offered to meet and drive the car with a "scanguage".
 
that is very nice since i have no other way at present to tell whether it is the car or the driver.
 
what car did you trade at 37? mine is 09 TCH.
#846 of 855
Re: Poor mileage in winter [sgoodman] by orly1
Feb 14, 2009 (11:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sgoodman (Feb 12, 2009 10:02 am)

hello macolyte,
 
is that "mac lover" - because i am also mac user. i have seen some of your earlier posts, when you first got the car and were stuggling to get EPA.
 
as per request, my length of trips ARE short, during the winter. and cdn_tch did explain the concept to me that even though the dial "looks as if" the car is warmed up it must still cycle in and out of ICE (post #823)
 
he also accepts 10 MPG less during winter.
 
consistently gotten roughly 24-25 MPG in winter (20º s to 40º s) sounds like me, only i've gotten these numbers regardless of temps.
 
your car sounds like mine, however i would not have purchased based on these numbers. in earlier posts, i have stated that from time to time the MFD will read between 35 - 40, usually right after fill up on a 30 minute plus drive.
 
then back to city and mileage creeps back down to below 30 tank average.
 
i've been ill this past week so i have not contacted GM at purchase location as suggested. will keep posting.
 
frankly all these posts that claim they are getting above EPA "without even trying" are beginning to depress me. (jealousy)
 
thanks for your interest. at least they posted my review on edmund's
 
i just heard a line in a t.v. show making fun of people who believe in the EPA estimates, saying that "EPA is just a number to get you in the car and take a test drive" so that you will then base you purchase on more/other factors - MY BIGGEST deciding factor was a belief in EPA estimates and blogs, media and other "PRO FE" propaganda.
 
good night macolyte
#847 of 855
Re: Poor mileage in winter [orly1] by wvgasguy
Feb 20, 2009 (5:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: orly1 (Feb 14, 2009 11:01 pm)

I am sure there are indeed circumstances where one has driving conditions that just won't allow them to utilize the TCH to meet EPA results.
 
In all fairness to Toyota, a handfull of people that don't get EPA results are not something that giant corporations would address. I realize there are a few people with your results but Toyota has sold thousands x thousands of hybrids. I'm sure for every legitimate complaint like yours that is still probably an environmental issue rather than a flaw that they have 100 people complain that simply do not know how to drive the TCH.
 
I believe the new EPA numbers really reflect the results of a drive run where the averages is of someone who does not maximize the advantages of the hybrid system.
 
Like all things it may not be a fit for all circumstances and your may be one.
 
I don't remember seeing it posted but what did you drive in the past in similar situations and waht milage did you achieve as compared to the EPA?
 
Cold, short trips would have easily dropped your results on your previous vehicle too.
 
My son got 32 mpg one time with a load of kids, my wife would get 35. I always would get 38+. Those differences though only amount to 10% differences
 
i just heard a line in a t.v. show making fun of people who believe in the EPA estimates, saying that "EPA is just a number to get you in the car and take a test drive" so that you will then base you purchase on more/other factors - MY BIGGEST deciding factor was a belief in EPA estimates and blogs, media and other "PRO FE" propaganda.
 
The EPA is only a "relative" number I ever used. I typically would average about 10% above the city number. The ad's today of 17 to 25 mpg are interesting but my experinece was that I would get about 19 on average with an EPA like that. The tests are accurate for the most part. They try to require a consistant test so that people can compare. However many people never get EPA on any of their cars and some average near the top consistantly.
 
I know I had an Infiniti FX45 and averaged 16 mpg and NEVER got over 17. Then as part of a maintenance service they picked up my car (nice service since I lived 100 miles away) I decided to check my car. I figured some kid would pick it up and hot rod it so I reset everything. To my surprise a nice older gentleman picked it up and when he got back I saw that he averaged 18.5 for the trip. I would have swore it was impossible to get that type of milage.
#848 of 855
FYI on EPA by acdii
Feb 22, 2009 (7:44 am)
Reply
I have always wondered why 3/4 ton and up trucks didn't get EPA numbers, and I think it is so they don't embarrass the 1/2 ton trucks. I had an F150, it got 13 MPG, no matter how I drove it. I now have an F350 Dually Crew Cab diesel, it gets 14 on a bad day and 22 on the highway. It weighs twice as much as the F150, it twice the size, and gets much better MPG. Makes one wonder eh? I have an 08 Veracruz, it gets better than EPA rated Highway, but just below EPA city, at least in winter. The Camry averages 44 MPG Summer, but 32 winter, the Prius 51 summer 42 winter. It is all in how you drive it, where you live, and the weather conditions. The EPA is only so you will have an idea of what you may get when driving.
#849 of 855
TCH MPG by checkamte
Feb 25, 2009 (8:41 pm)
Reply
I see many in here are having varying results with the MPG on their TCH's. I have had mine (2009 model) for about a year now; I find that the average tank I'm able to obtain is anywhere from 32-35. I think you really have to be cognitive about the way your driving these to get the MPG that's advertised. If I'm driving mine with the purpose to try and obtain the highest MPG I can probably get 35 for the tank and if I just drive it with out regard for anything I end up with 31-32. In my case I notice better MPG on HWY driving vs city; Most of my driving is around the city relatively flat and as previously mentioned get 32-34 MPG. I have taken it on a few HWY trip and received almost 40 MPG! Either way it's not bad, but I'm not sure how much better it is than the gas powered 4 cyI.
 
I'm not complaining a bit about the car as it's probably one of the best cars I have ever owned; smooth, quiet, comfortable, nice sound system, reliable etc... I don't see how you can obtain the advertised MPG numbers unless you are driving under ideal conditions with the purpose for trying to obtain the maximum MPG though. The car will always use the gas motor to accelerate so driving around a city with a lot of stop and go is not going to result in very good numbers in my opinion.
#850 of 855
Re: TCH MPG [checkamte] by acdii
Feb 26, 2009 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: checkamte (Feb 25, 2009 8:41 pm)

My winter numbers have dropped, different gas formula and the engine needs to run longer to keep the EGT's up. My summer driving I am seeing the EPA number though, and that is without gluing an eye on the MPG gauge. In City driving though, there are too many lights, and unless you can get in a groove where you hit every light just right, you are very hard pressed to get it into EV mode. I also tend to inflate my tires a bit higher than what the book says so there is less rolling resistance.
#851 of 855
Feathering seems like a no brainer to me by housestuff
Mar 04, 2009 (9:49 am)
Reply
I got my TCH and fit right into it getting 38 on my first tank with combined driving. This was a calculated real mileage and not the one posted on the dash (I don't believe in those dash calcs.). I find it really simple to just accelerate just past the desired speed then back off the gas completely to get the electric to kick in, then just lightly touch pedal to maintain speed. Works like a champ every time. If you have your foot at all on the gas you will never get the electric to take over.
 
I considered a VW Jetta TDI diesel before buying this because I own a 125000 mile 98 Beetle TDI that I have never gotten less than 48mpg on no matter how hard I drive it. I enjoy this car but if I had it to do over I would have bought the TDI. Just too much playing around to get the good mileage with this one (my wife will never do it, lead foot you know). I now have both worlds though and can play the gas vs diesel price war games with the oil companies.
 
For all those out there that just don't have the feel for the TCH I highly recommend you condider the VW diesel, all the perks of mileage with none of the messing around. Don't worry about the engine it's clean, quiet, lasts forever, has a 10k mile maintenance interval, cheaper, tax credit, 3 years totally free maintenance.
#852 of 855
Re: Feathering seems like a no brainer to me [housestuff] by acdii
Mar 05, 2009 (6:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: housestuff (Mar 04, 2009 9:49 am)

Hope you have done the 90K recommended timing belt change, if not, be prepared for a world of hurt when it lets go. That was one of the deciding factors against my getting a 2006 TDI when I had a chance, didn't like that written in stone change the belt along with a few other components, and have seen and heard the horror stories about cost when it does let go. The other reason I didn't get one was the financing was way too high, and the dealer wasn't willing to go down on the price, he was pretty much hung on MSRP. I wound up with a Prius instead, with 2.9% financing, and 53 MPG. BUT when I feel the need for that soothing clack clack of a diesel, I hop in my F350 and give it a go.
#853 of 855
Re: Poor mileage in winter [orly1] by cdn_tch
Apr 29, 2009 (7:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: orly1 (Feb 14, 2009 11:01 pm)

Orly1, what happened with the hypermiler who test drove your car?
 
Did you just need to learn so techniques or wa sthere a problem with the car?
 
Please let us know so we can all learn from your experience.
 
Thanks.

Messages Page 86 of 87
1
...
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement