Sign In Join 



Saturn gets Opel Astra

154 messages,  Last post on Feb 21, 2008 at 2:23 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Saturn Astra, Hatchback


Messages Page 12 of 16
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#107 of 154
Re: well [danzigdan] by harrychezt
Jun 14, 2007 (9:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: danzigdan (Jun 14, 2007 11:15 am)

The SX4 was VERY impressive at the auto show---I really like the way it is put together.
 
Yes, it looked good from the photos, and sounds good, too.
The In-Laws CUV SX4 is solid as a rock, and not a bad interior, either.
Handling is sharp, ride is decent, and 0-60 feels faster than the 10 seconds it takes to get there(or so, with automatic) .
MPG is 27-28(I dunno if he still leadfoots, or not).
The car/sedan SX4 should get 30-31MPG, at least?
It is supposed to be lighter, due to FWD set up only.
It will be on the list of "test drives" for the Fall.
#108 of 154
0-60 time is a totally bogus stat by helmutvonkopf
Sep 12, 2007 (6:45 am)
Reply
When was the last time anybody over the age of 19 floored their accelerator from a standstill to reach 60mph in the least amount of time?
 
It amazes me how Americans consider this and BHP as important stats. Torque, specifically the torque band, and mid-range acceleration figures are the real world figures that count, because they dictate your ability to accelerate under real world conditions.
 
You avoid being run over by an SUV by being a good driver, not sitting in a hot rod. I drove a Saturn SL2 for years which was a total dog with no mid range pickup whatsoever and I just learned to not put myself in situations where I needed to accelerate hard.
 
Some facts from the Vauxhall ( UK Opel ) site in Europe.
The 1.8 VVT engine variant there develops 140BHP and 175 ft/lbs of torque at 3800 rpm. It looks like the US version has lost 45 ft/lbs of the torque and so it will possibly not perform that well. Begs the question as to why they would detune the engine in this way? I suspect so that they can con the Americans into paying another $3k for a 6 cylinder variant they don't really need that gets crap mpg.
 
It is hard to relate fuel economy figures but the mixed cycle UK figure is 36.2mpg which translates to 30mpg using US gallons. Highway consumption in US gallons is 37.8mpg which seems to be pretty good. Overall it looks as economical as one would expect.
 
It's a pity for me that they are not out yet. I just bought a Golf ( i.e. Rabbit ) and I was not chuffed at having only a 2.5 liter engine option. I for one don't need to be catapulted to 60mph in under 10 seconds.
#109 of 154
Re: 0-60 time is a totally bogus stat [helmutvonkopf] by bumpy
Sep 12, 2007 (7:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: helmutvonkopf (Sep 12, 2007 6:45 am)

The torque listed is newton-meters, which works out to about 130 ft-lbs (multiply by 0.742).
#110 of 154
Re: 0-60 time is a totally bogus stat [helmutvonkopf] by andys120
Sep 12, 2007 (8:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: helmutvonkopf (Sep 12, 2007 6:45 am)

When was the last time anybody over the age of 19 floored their accelerator from a standstill to reach 60mph in the least amount of time?
 
It happens every morning on the Saw Mill and Hutchinson River Parkways in the New York area.
#111 of 154
- by dudleyr
Sep 14, 2007 (12:10 pm)
Reply
It happens every morning on the Saw Mill and Hutchinson River Parkways in the New York area.
 
Sounds like they need to relax a little out there. No wonder so many people complain about poor gas mileage.
#112 of 154
dudleyr by michaell
Sep 14, 2007 (1:07 pm)
Reply
It happens every morning on the Saw Mill and Hutchinson River Parkways in the New York area.
 
Even though I don't live in NY, I have visited there a number of times and the issue is that those roads were built in the 30's and 40's and the on ramps are devilishly short -- maybe 100' long, in some cases.
 
You have to floor it to get up to a speed where you can safely merge into traffic.
 
Here's hoping for an Astra Red Line - 260HP turbo from the Sky RL -- woo hoo!
#113 of 154
Re: dudleyr [michaell] by fezo
Sep 14, 2007 (6:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: michaell (Sep 14, 2007 1:07 pm)

Yeah and Andy's two examples definitely fall into that category.
 
It's been a long time for me but the Merritt Parkway in CT is the same way.
#114 of 154
Re: dudleyr [fezo] by andys120
Sep 16, 2007 (5:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Sep 14, 2007 6:18 pm)

The fact is that most of the parkways and expressways in the New York metro area feature short on-ramps that require full acceleration to merge properly.
 
Unfortunately most drivers have never visited the last two thirds of their accelerator pedal so they dribble onto the parkways at 35 or 40 endangering themselves and oncoming traffic.
 
True Confession: Perhaps it's because I come from the NY area but I still floor it when merging onto any limited access highway (assuming the ramp is straight enough to see
if the entry's clear) and it's been quite a few years since I've seen nineteen.
#115 of 154
- by dudleyr
Sep 16, 2007 (8:41 pm)
Reply
Sounds like the speed limits are too high to support the on ramps. You guys should holler at your local reps to lower the speed limits.
 
Like that will happen.
#116 of 154
Re: dudleyr [andys120] by fezo
Sep 17, 2007 (4:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Sep 16, 2007 5:34 am)

Oh, sure. You should see some of the creative on and off ramps the Garden State Parkway has come up with.
 
The original design of the Parkway was fine, but it was built for a state with the half the population of today's New Jersey.

Messages Page 12 of 16
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement