You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Honda Fit
Honda Fit vs Honda Civic

237 messages, Last post on Oct 29, 2008 at 2:15 PM
You are in the Honda Fit Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: mikecapone (May 02, 2006 6:15 pm) I'm tired of seeing all gains in efficiency going to more horsepower instead of fuel efficiency. We don't need more horsepower.." Sorry, I'll take an increase in horsepower any day over an extra couple of miles. 109 HP is marginal as it is, so any increase would be welcome. I'm not so poor I can't afford the $4-5 dollars I might save per tank, and I'd rather enjoy driving then waste time trying to be some miser milking every last mile out of a couple bucks worth of gas.
|
|
|
Replying to: mikecapone (May 02, 2006 6:15 pm) Basically, they have 1,2 and 1,3 available in European Market. Those would certainly satisfy some US customers. For my part, I would like a turbocharged 1.5 because I hunger for torque, but everyone should have the model that fit his/her needs and priorities. Knowing the 1.3 IDSI is sold in China as well, the factory consumption figures only change by 0,1L/100 compared to the 1,5 , which means basically nearly nothing. Should you really want a mpg increase, the Fit should be in diesel, with maybe 10 mpg more. So more powertrain choices, more options, will certainly make a broader audience happy. the limited offer for the Fit means Honda do not consider the N/A seriously as they did for China. If they combined the existing options /powertrains existing in other countries, they could do easily. |
|
|
Replying to: mikecapone (May 02, 2006 6:15 pm) It's been OK in the city and I've gone on 4-5 hour highway runs and there hasn't been a problem. (I haven’t had to wear ear muffs, either.) I've notice a lack of power on accelerating hard, or when the car is full of passengers, but nothing dangerous. So, my question is - What is the minimum acceptable horsepower in an alternate engine and what sort of gas saving (and, more importantly to me, emissions saving!) can be expected?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: manko (May 02, 2006 9:56 pm) For a car the size and weight of the Fit, 109 is not marginal. Most people don't even know how much of their engine's power they actually use in normal driving. |
|
|
Replying to: mwqa (May 03, 2006 4:47 am) |
|
|
Replying to: shneor (May 03, 2006 6:37 am) Do you consider the Fit to be underpowered?
|
|
|
Replying to: mwqa (May 03, 2006 7:06 am) Do you consider the Fit to be underpowered? Just going by the numbers (109hp/105torque), it looks like the Fit is a slow car. My old 2002 Hyundai Accent is rated with almost the same horsepower and it did 0-60 in about 11 sec. However from Car and Driver's last issue, you will see the Fit does 0-60 in 8.7 sec, the best one in the quarter mile, as well as passing lane handling (They said it even bested the Corvette Z06). I've driven 4 adults in my Fit Sport 5spd and I don't feel it being underpowered at all. It really sprints and is very comparable to the Mini rather than an entry level car. Maybe to really maximize the fuel economy, Honda can offer the smaller engine as long as they can keep the 0-60 to between 10-11 sec to match the Hyundai Accent but you get way way much better gas mileage than the already great gas mileage of 37 mpg real world usage. For me, it satisfies me with what I want in terms of power and fuel economy. Instead of "I drive a fast car but I spend a lot for gas" or "I get great mileage but its a slow car", you get "I drive a fast car and I get great gas mileage!". |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mwqa (May 03, 2006 7:06 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: chrisducati (May 03, 2006 7:38 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: manko (May 02, 2006 9:56 pm) The weight of the Fit is 2432 lbs with 109 hp, qhich equals out to 22.3 lbs per hp. This may seem like a big difference, but if you take into account the weight of 2 passengers in my Accord, the power to weight ratio is similar to that of a Fit with one driver. I think I could handle that small difference. Any car that can accelerate to 60 miles per hour (not in a hard start with wheelspin, but a street start at 5-60MPH) in less than 10 seconds should be perfectly adequate if not more-so on today's roadways. Shoot, 10 years ago, my 1996 Accord was brand new with only 130 hp through a 4-speed auto. It's a little poky in comparison to today's cars, but interstate speeds havent changed much since then, cars have just gotten more advanced in acceleration. I could keep that car's power and take the increase in mileage anyday.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Honda Fit
Honda Fit vs Honda Civic
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Fit
2011 Honda Civic



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats