Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Land Rover 2008 Land Rover LR2
1122 messages, Last post on Oct 19, 2009 at 7:14 AM
You are in the Land Rover Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Mar 15, 2008 7:22 pm) Some of the 'little' things LR (Ford) left off the LR2 are aggravating - like intermittent rear wiper and homelink for starters. Cant have everything I guess. |
|
|
|
|
Consumers Union has a generally favorable short take on the LR2 this month. Other than interior quirks and fuel economy (18 mph is all they are getting in mixed mode driving) they seem to find ithe LR2 drives well (provided you are not in hurry) and its AWD works seamlessly. Their Full info appears online sometime in April. |
|
|
Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Mar 17, 2008 5:50 pm) |
|
|
http://www.autoincar.com/tata-assures-jaguar-rover-workers-of-retaining-brands-t- ouch/ http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/218916/land_rover.html
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: manup (Mar 19, 2008 7:29 am) |
|
| Has anyone and/or LRGuy44, British Rover, etc., heard or seen anything pertaining to changes or improvements large or small to the 2009 model year ? | |
|
Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Mar 17, 2008 5:50 pm) They did add that they experienced similar behaviour in 2003 with the BMW X5 3.0i and that a software change fixed the beemer's problem. Perhaps if LR jumps on this issue they could have it fixed in time for the Sept issue? As of now though it seems RSC doesn't help at least in this test. Sorry folks, just the facts cause I'm considering this vehicle and I watch closely for any info. I expect to hear that Land Rover has fixed this issue and will issue a TSB or a recall or something. Course, gota explain it to the folks at TATA first. Oh, they also said they're getting a disappointing 18 mpg overall. Ugh. If that's the case, I'll stick with my Navigator.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jeyhoe (Apr 05, 2008 8:00 am) I am trying to find a video of the moose test they do in Europe as I am sure it is a better conducted test then anything CR does. The roll stability control is a more advanced Volvo unit so I just don't see this happening unless there was a malfunction or unless CR deliberately tried to get the car to flip like they did with the Samurai. http://video.aol.com/video-detail/volvo-xc90-suv-moose/3034785664 Closest thing I have found so far. The problem is the defender failed the moose test, not surprising considering how old the defender is, and so every link is to videos on the defender test.
|
|
|
Replying to: british_rover (Apr 05, 2008 8:34 am) CR aint perfect, but they test EVERY car the same way. If the LR2's wheels came off the ground, and no other CUV/SUV did, THAT's a scary thing. Probably most people would've flipped. You can put blinders on if u want. BMW apparently responded correctly. If LR doesn't address this, they are OFF my short list. Oh, and you're wrong about the outcome of the Suzuki lawsuit: "In 1996 Consumer Reports was the subject of a lawsuit by Suzuki Motors regarding a road test of the Suzuki Samurai that the magazine had published in 1988. Suzuki alleged that the magazine's test of the company's popular off-roader had been skewed so as to show that the vehicle was prone to tipping over during an avoidance test (an equivalent of other magazines' "elk test"). The lawsuit was dismissed by mutual consent in 2004." -source suv_rollovers.com |
|
|
Replying to: jeyhoe (Apr 05, 2008 8:00 am) Regards, Tom
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Land Rover 2008 Land Rover LR2
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Land Rover LR2
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
