Sign In Join 



2008 Land Rover LR2

1122 messages,  Last post on Oct 19, 2009 at 7:14 AM

You are in the Land Rover Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Land Rover LR2, Future Vehicle, SUV


Messages Page 98 of 113
1
...
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
...
113
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#964 of 1122
22 inches of water by kurtamaxxxguy
Feb 12, 2008 (8:42 am)
Reply
I read that the LR2 can apparently handle up to 22 inches of water before its engine floods out.
that certainly sounds unique compared to most other vehicles!
 
However..
Will Land Rover __warranty cover__ an LR2 that drives through 22 inches of water and then develops problems later on? Or will that dunk and drive be considered abusing the vehicle?
#965 of 1122
Re: MPG [kurtamaxxxguy] by british_rover
Feb 12, 2008 (10:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Feb 11, 2008 9:10 pm)

You do realize that the Q7 is a much larger vehicle then the LR2 don't you? The Q7 out weighs the LR2 by about 800 lbs.
 
link title
 
The LR2 scored five stars and the Q7 scored four stars. They both scored the exact same 16 points on side impact tests but the Q7 scored badly on the frontal impact.
 
Front impact
Poor welding resulted in rupture of the footwell area. There was separation of the seam connecting the firewall to the footwell and failure of spot-welds in the footwell and its connection to the A-pillar. Audi have informed us that they have now improved control over this part of production but the car lost points for its performance in this area. Structures in the dashboard presented a potential risk to the knees and femurs of the driver.

 
That is right from the NCAP testing page.
 
I guess I just don't understand what you are trying to argue. Of course the LR2 had more interior deflection then the Q7 because the Q7 is heavier and wider then the LR2 but the test data shows that in the end that didn't matter. The LR2 and Q7 both scored maximum points for the pole test and the LR2 lost a fraction of a point in the regular side impact.
 
In regards to the LR3 performing poorly on the test vs other cars that doesn't make any sense. In frontal impact tests the vehicle is supposed to be crashing into another vehicle of similar size so a LR3 has to hit another 5,800 lbs vehicle. Guess what there aren't many 5,800 lbs vehicles out there for a LR3 to hit.
 
Front impact
Structures in the dashboard presented a potential risk to the knees of both driver and passenger.

 
That is from the LR3 crash test page and it is obvious the LR3 needs knee airbags which it will get during the upcoming interior refresh. The Range Rover picked up knee airbags in the 2007 Range Rover refresh and the LR2 has always had knee airbags.
 
Just look down the Large Off-roader list and you can see that the LR3 is about the same as the other big SUVs. It scored four stars while only three SUVs scored five stars and the X5 got a retest to pick up that fifth star after there was a a problem with the original test vehicle.
#966 of 1122
Re: MPG [british_rover] by kurtamaxxxguy
Feb 12, 2008 (7:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Feb 12, 2008 10:02 am)

I was mainly studying side impacts, and watching the deformations. The fact that the Q7, in side impact, bent less than the LR2 despite weighing 800 pounds more, proved interesting.
 
A lot of vehicles there got similar side impact ratings. Interesting, as some of the driver dummies were being thrown around a lot more in some vehicles than others.
 
But.... good points wrt the frontal impacts.
 
Hopefully IIHS will someday test an LR2.
#967 of 1122
...as for the deep water... by kurtamaxxxguy
Mar 03, 2008 (8:51 am)
Reply
would it be likely that Land Rover would void the warranty of any customer actually trying the 22" deep water drive?
 
Some other "outbacking" manufacturers I queried on this said that once the water goes above the vehicle floorboards, the warranty's toast.
#968 of 1122
Got Sunroof Panel Recall Notice today by u2fan1967
Mar 03, 2008 (3:55 pm)
Reply
Hey all,
Just thought I'd share that today I got the official safety recall notice from Land Rover North America for my LR2 in the mail. The recall was for the sunroof panel failures. The recall is for a failure on the sunroof guide which could "cause the sunroof to become detached from its operating mechanism" !! Yikes!
 
I remember reading about folks to which this happened. It must have been scary.
 
I personally haven't had any problems with my sunroof, I love mine, but will still get it replaced.
 
If you own an LR2 and didn't get this notice it says to contact
Land Rover Customer Relationship Center at
 
Land Rover North America
ATTN: Customer Relationship Center
555 MacArthur Boulevard
Mahwah, NJ 07430-2327
1-800-637-6837 Option 9.
 
Happy motoring.
#969 of 1122
LR2 and iPhone by 3dg
Mar 03, 2008 (7:07 pm)
Reply
Just got my LR2 today. The iPhone saw it right away, but the LR2 couldn't see the phone. The car is supposed to generate a pair code, and it doesn't.
But, try it again, and when the iPhone shows Land Rover, click it, and enter 2121 as the pair code. In a moment, the name of your iPhone will appear on the dash. It reads missed / recent calls, and even pulls in your address book. You can cycle through recent calls from the steering wheel.
#970 of 1122
Wiper problems by newowner8
Mar 14, 2008 (6:12 pm)
Reply
Hi. I generally like my LR2 but we really dislike the lack of an intermittent wiper setting. There is an automatic setting that goes too fast and then too slow and is constantly changing (distracting). I hear others have complained about this function. Dealer says maybe Land Rover will issue a "fix" but I have my doubts. Also, be careful automatic setting is off going through carwash as I lost a wiper and almost a windshield when they went off during carwash! I would love a plain old fashioned intermittent setting, myself.
#971 of 1122
Re: Wiper problems [newowner8] by andybl29
Mar 14, 2008 (6:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: newowner8 (Mar 14, 2008 6:12 pm)

Had a lot of rain here in FL today. I had the same thought as my wipers were driving me insane! The setting should definitely be different--the switch in speeds in extremely distracting.
#972 of 1122
Wipers by ohwell159
Mar 15, 2008 (5:38 am)
Reply
I totally agree regarding the wipers. I originally posted about the wipers shortly after getting my LR2 in October 07. I would love intermittent wiper on the front but what really bothers me is the lack of choice on the rear wiper. It is either on or off and the delay is 6 seconds. I complained to LR directly because to me that is a safety issue and I was told that there is no defective and that is they way they are designed so that is it. It seems like it is the smallest things that drive us the most crazy. I do think that a vehicle that is made for off roading should have more advanced front/rear wipers. On a positive note I am going on 6 months with my fully loaded LR2 and I love the car and have only very minor issues that were fixed immediately. The customer service at my dealership is excellent and I love having my car come back clean and shiny.
#973 of 1122
Re: Wipers [ohwell159] by kyfdx HOST
Mar 15, 2008 (7:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ohwell159 (Mar 15, 2008 5:38 am)

I checked the rear wiper interval time on my Honda CR-V.. also.. six seconds..
 
Might be a universal standard? I can't remember having a rear-wiper on any vehicle that you could have on all the time..

Messages Page 98 of 113
1
...
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
...
113
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement